Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Agriculture in China

ISSN 1673-7334

ISSN 1673-744X(Online)

CN 11-5729/S

Front. Agric. China    2008, Vol. 2 Issue (3) : 331-337    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11703-008-0054-y
Effect of breed, sex and birth parity on growth, carcass and meat quality in pigs
TANG Zhonglin1, LI Kui2, PENG Zhongzhen3, LIU Bang3, FAN Bin3, ZHAO Shuhong3, LI Xiaoping3, XU Sanping4
1.Department of Gene and Cell Engineering, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University; 2.Department of Gene and Cell Engineering, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences; 3.Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University; 4.Animal Husbandry Bureau
 Download: PDF(84 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract The effects of breed, sex and birth parity on the traits of growth, carcass and meat quality were investigated in three different breeds including Swedish Landrace, British Large White and an indigenous Chinese breed – Tongcheng pigs. The results indicated that the Swedish Landrace and the British Large White had advantages over the Tongcheng pigs in growth rate, feed conversion rate (FCR) and carcass traits, but had disadvantages in meat quality. In contrast to the British Large White, the Swedish Landrace had higher average daily gain during the trial (ADG2) (877.04 gday-1 vs. 813.95 gday-1, P < 0.05), and marbling score (MS) (2.48 vs. 2.02, P < 0.01), larger eye muscle area (EMA) (41.80 cm2 vs. 35.14 cm, P < 0.01) and more efficient feed conversion rate (FCR) (3.06 vs. 3.29, P < 0.05), lower muscle shear force (MSF) (4.20 kgf (1 kgf = 9.80665 N) vs. 4.93 kgf, P < 0.05) and backfat thickness (BF) (all P < 0.01) including live backfat thickness (LBF), average backfat thickness at 3 points in the carcass (ABF), backfat thickness between 6th and 7th ribs (6–7 th BF) and backfat thickness at 10th rib (10 th BF). There was a difference (P < 0.05) only in MS between castrated females (CF) and castrated males (CM). Birth parity affected ADG2 (P < 0.05), some carcass characteristics and meat quality, including CL1 (P < 0.001), CL2 (P < 0.05), BF (ABF, 6–7th BF and 10th BF, all P < 0.001), EMD (P < 0.001), EMA (P < 0.001), percentage of leaf and caul fat (PLC) (P < 0.05), proportion of lean and bone of the ham (PLBH) (P < 0.05), muscle drip loss percentage (DL) (P < 0.05) and intramuscular fat content (IMF) (P < 0.05). The breed-sex interaction only impacted the average daily gain from birth to marketing (ADG1) and DL (both P < 0.05). However, there was no significant effect of sex-parity interaction on all the traits tested.
Issue Date: 05 September 2008
 Cite this article:   
TANG Zhonglin,LI Kui,PENG Zhongzhen, et al. Effect of breed, sex and birth parity on growth, carcass and meat quality in pigs[J]. Front. Agric. China, 2008, 2(3): 331-337.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fag/EN/10.1007/s11703-008-0054-y
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fag/EN/Y2008/V2/I3/331
1 Ball R O (2000). Differences among genotype and gender for growth, carcasscomposition and meat quality. Adv PorkProd, 11: 227–235
2 Barton-Gade P A (1987). Meat and fat quality in boars, castrates and gilts. Livest Prod Sci, 16: 187–196.
doi:10.1016/0301‐6226(87)90019‐4
3 Bradley W, Daniel H, Mike E (1999). Performance of one-quarter Chinese(Meishan) and three-breed conventional crosses for sow productivityand growth and carcass characteristics of the progeny. University of Illinois, USA
4 Chen Y S (2002a). The evaluation indices and grading standard of highquality pork. Swine Industry, 3: 1–5 (in Chinese)
5 Chen Y S (2002b). The index and measurement for fine pork. Swine Prod, 3: 1–5 (in Chinese)
6 Eggert J M, Sheiss E B, Schinckel A P, Forrest J C, Grant A L, Mills S E, Watkins B A (1996). Effects of genotype, sex, slaughter weight, and dietaryfat on pig growth, carcass composition, and pork quality. In: 1996 Purdue Swine Day Articles. West Lafayette: Purdue University
7 Fan B, Tang Z L, Xu S P, Liu B, Peng Z Z, Li K (2006). Germplasm characteristic and conservation of Tongchengpig: A case study of preservation and utilization of Chinese indigenouspig breeds. Anim Gen Res info, 39: 51–63
8 Lan Y H, Mckeith F K, Novakofski J, Carr T R (1993). Carcass and muscle characteristics of Yorkshire, Meishan, Yorkshire× Meishan, Meishan × Yorkshire, Fengjing × Yorkshireand Minzhu × Yorkshire pigs. J AnimSci, 71: 3344–3349
9 Leach L M, Ellis M, Sutton D S, Mckeith F K, Wilson E R (1996). The growthperformance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of halothanecarrier and negative pigs. J Anim Sci, 74: 934–943
10 Lee C, Kim K (2000). The effectof gender or gonadectomy on growth and plasma cholesterol levels inpigs. J Anim Sci, 78(E-Suppl): 309
11 Li C L, Pan Y C, Meng H (2006). Polymorphism of the H-FABP, MC4Rand ADD1 genes in the Meishan and four other pig populations in China. South Afica J Anim Sci, 36: 1–6
12 Peinado J, Guirao J, Nieto M, Mateos G G, Medel P (2003a). Effect of sex, castration,and slaughter weight on pork quality. JAnim Sci, 81(E-Suppl): 201
13 Peinado J, Mateos G G, Fuentetaja Snchez A J, Medel P (2003b). Influence of sex and castration of males and femaleson performance and carcass quality of pigs. J Anim Sci, 81(E-Suppl): 201
14 Peng Z Z (1994): Genetic improvement for swine. Beijing: Agriculture Press, China (in Chinese)
15 SAS Institute. . (1999). SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Publishing
16 Serrano M P, Valencia D G, Lázaro R, Fuentetaja A, Mateos G G (2005). Effectof sire line and sex on productive performance and carcass qualityof Iberian pigs. J Anim Sci, 83(E-Suppl): 156
17 Tummaruk P, Lundeheim N, Einarsson S, Dalin A M (2001). Effect of birth litter size, birth parity number, growth rate, backfatthickness and age at first mating of gilts on their reproductive performanceas sows. Anim Reprod Sci, 66: 225–237.
doi:10.1016/S0378‐4320(01)00095‐1
18 Xiong Y Z, Peng Z Z, Zhang S S, Deng C Y (1992). The breeding and crossing for commercial utilization of a new lean-typebreed-Hubei white pig. In: Proceedingsof the International Symposium on Chinese Pig Breeds. Harbin: NortheastForestry University Press, 100–107
19 Xu Z Y (1989). The Germplasm Characteristics of Indigenous Pigs inChina. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Science and Technology Press, China (in Chinese)
20 Young L D (1992). Effects of Duroc, Meishan, Fengjing, and Minzhu boarson carcass traits of first-cross barrows. J Anim Sci, 70: 2030–2037
21 Young L D (1995a). Survival, body weights, feed efficiency, and carcasstraits of 3/4 White Composite and 1/4 Duroc, 1/4 Meishan, 1/4 Fengjing,or 1/4 Minzhu pigs. J Anim Sci, 73: 3534–3542
22 Young L D (1995b). Reproduction of F1 Meishan, Fengjing,Minzhu, and Duroc gilts and sows. J AnimSci, 73: 711–721
23 Young L D (1995c). Survival, body weights, feed efficiency, and carcasstraits of 3/4 White Composite and 1/4 Duroc, 1/4 Meishan, 1/4 Fengjing,or 1/4 Minzhu pigs. J Anim Sci, 73: 3534–3542
24 Young L D (1998a). Reproduction of 3/4 White composite and 1/4 Duroc, 1/4Meishan, 1/4 Fengjing, or 1/4 Minzhu gilts and sows. J Anim Sci, 76: 1559–1567
25 Young L D (1998b). Survival, body weights, feed efficiency, and carcasstraits of 7/8 White Composition and 1/8 Duroc, 1/8 Meishan, 1/8 Fengjing,or 1/8 Minzhu. J Anim Sci, 76: 155
26 Zhang W L (2002a). The methods on measurement for muscle score and acidityin pigs. Swine Prod, 63: 33–34 (in Chinese)
27 Zhang W L (2002b). The methods on measurement for water holding capacityin pigs. Swine Prod, 64: 25–26 (in Chinese)
28 Zhang W L (2002c). The measurement for pork quality and taste. Swine Prod, 65: 33–35 (in Chinese)
29 Zhang Z K (1985). Pig Breeds in China. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Press, China (in Chinese)
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed