Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Agriculture in China

ISSN 1673-7334

ISSN 1673-744X(Online)

CN 11-5729/S

Front. Agric. China    2008, Vol. 2 Issue (3) : 343-347    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11703-008-0055-x
Effect of cell mediated immunity regulation of duck enhanced by duck IFN-α eukaryon expression plasmid and inoculated with DPV attenuated vaccine by gene-gun
CHENG Zhiping, CHENG Anchun, WANG Mingshu, CHEN Bin, LIU Chuang, DUAN Kun, ZHOU Xue, CHEN Xiaoyue
Sichuan Agricultural University
 Download: PDF(101 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract In order to study the effect of cell mediated immunity regulation of duck IFN-? eukaryon expression plasmid (pcDNA-SDIFN-?) on duck plague virus (DPV) attenuated vaccine in ducks, pcDNA-SDIFN-? was administered to 28-day-old ducks at doses of 1, 3 and 6 ?g per duck, respectively, by gene-gun. PBS and empty vector pcDNA were used as control. Fifteen days later, all ducks were injected with DPV attenuated vaccine and blood samples were collected at 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 49, 63 and 84 days after injection. T-lymphocyte proliferation tests (MTT) were used to detect the T-lymphocyte proliferation in the peripheral blood (PBL) of ducks. Blood samples collected at 7, 14, 21, 28, 35 and 49 days after injection were detected by fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) for recording the number of CD3+ T-lymphocytes of ducks. Results were as follows: (1) Reaction of T-lymphocytes in PBL to ConA (OD value) of ducks treated with pcDNA-SDIFN-? was higher than that of PBS and pcDNA control groups in 3–84 days. There were highly significant differences between the 1 ?g per duck group and the two control groups in 3–84 days (P ≤ 0.01), between the 3 ?g per duck group and the two control groups in 3–84 days (P ≤ 0.01, P ≤ 0.05), and between the 6 ?g per duck group and the two control groups in 7–49 days (P ≤ 0.01, P ≤ 0.05). The significant difference was also present between the groups of 1, 3 and 6 ?g per duck in 3–35 days (P ≤ 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the 3 and 6 ?g per duck groups (P ≥ 0.05). The pcDNA control group was higher than PBS control group, but no difference was detected (P ≥ 0.05). (2) Change of the number of CD3+ T-lymphocytes in ducks administered with different doses of pcDNA-SDIFN-? was higher than that of PBS and pcDNA control groups in 7–49 days. The change in the 1 ?g per duck group was significantly higher than that in PBS and pcDNA control groups in 14–49 days (P ≤ 0.01). There were significant differences between the 3 ?g per duck group and the two control groups in 21–49 days (P ≤ 0.01, P ≤ 0.05) and between the 6 ?g per duck group and the two control groups in 7–49 days (P ≤ 0.01, P ≤ 0.05). However, no significant differences among the groups of 1, 3, and 6 ?g per duck groups (P ≥ 0.05) and between the two control groups (P ≥ 0.05) were found. The results indicated that pcDNA-SDIFN-? administered 15 days before injection of DPV-attenuated vaccine could significantly enhance cellular immunity induced by DPV-attenuated vaccine. pcDNA-SDIFN-? is an excellent DPV-attenuated vaccine molecular adjuvant and the best result can be obtained with the dose of 1 ?g per duck of pcDNA-SDIFN-? inoculated by gene-gun.
Issue Date: 05 September 2008
 Cite this article:   
CHENG Zhiping,CHENG Anchun,WANG Mingshu, et al. Effect of cell mediated immunity regulation of duck enhanced by duck IFN-α eukaryon expression plasmid and inoculated with DPV attenuated vaccine by gene-gun[J]. Front. Agric. China, 2008, 2(3): 343-347.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fag/EN/10.1007/s11703-008-0055-x
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fag/EN/Y2008/V2/I3/343
1 Bertram E M, Wilkinson R G, Lee B A, Jilbert A R, Kotlarski I (1996). Identificationof duck T-lymphocytes using an anti-human T cell (CD3) antiserum. Vet Immunol Immunop, 7(51): 353–363.
doi:10.1016/0165‐2427(95)05528‐2
2 Cauchy L, Malkinson M (1981). The mitogenicresponse to concanavalin A of Muscovy duck peripheral blood lymphoeytesin the early post-hatching period. AvianPathol, 10(1): 77–81.
doi:10.1080/03079458108418459
3 Chattergoon M A, Robinson T M, Boyer J D, Weiner D B (1998). Specific immune induction following DNA-based immunization through in vivo transfection and activation of macrophages/antigen-presentingcells. J Immunology, 160(12): 5707–5718
4 Chen B, Cheng A C, Wang M S, Yu Y, Tang Q, Shi Q, Zhang D, Peng J K, Chen H B (2006). Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of the type I interferonfrom Ma duck. Chin J Vet Sci, 26(4): 401–404 (in Chinese)
5 Chen S S, Tang X M (1995). MedicalCell and Molecular Biology. Shanghai: Shanghai Medical University Press, 2–4 (in Chinese)
6 Cheng A C, Wang M S, Liu F, Song Y, Yuan G P, Han X Y, Xu C, Liao Y H, Wen M, Zhou W G, Jia R Y (2005). Distribution and Excretion of Duck Plague Virus AttenuatedCha Strain in Vaccinated Ducklings. ChinJ Vet Sci, (3): 231–233, 258 (in Chinese)
7 Enrico P, Laura B, Simona P, Tiziana D P, Paola S, Enrico D V, Massimo V, Imerio C, Isabelle S, Edward D M, David T, Isabella D, Filippo B (2002). TypeI IFN as a natural adjuvant for a protective immune response: Lessonsfrom the influenza vaccine model. J Immunology, 169: 375–383
8 Fynan E F, Webster R G, Fuller D H, Haynes J R, Santoro J C, Robinson H L (1993). DNA vaccines: protective immunizations by parenteral,mucosal and gene-gun inoculations. ProcNatl Acad Sci USA, 90: 11478–11482.
doi:10.1073/pnas.90.24.11478
9 Guo H C, Liu Z X, Sun S Q, Leng Q W, Li D, Liu X T (2004). The Effect of Bovine IFN-α on the immune response in guineapigs vaccinated with DNA vaccine of Foot-and-Mouth disease virus. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica, 36(10): 701–706
10 Isaacs A, Lindanmann J (1957). Virusinterference 1: the interferon. Proc RSoc Lond Biol, 147: 258–267
11 Jin N Y, Wang H J, Wang J Q, Yi X H, Wu Y M, Yin Z (2004). Study on immune response of mice to expression productionof HIV- 1gag/IFNα- 2b. Biotechnology, 14(1): 14–16 (in Chinese)
12 Kang M J, Kim C K, Kim M Y, Hwang T S, Kang S Y, Kim W K, Ko J J, Oh Y K (2004). Skin permeation, bio-distribution,and expression of topically applied plasmid DNA. Gene Med, 6: 1238–1246.
doi:10.1002/jgm.620
13 Krieg A M, Yi A K, Sehorr J, Davis H L (1998). The role of CpG dinucleotides in DNA vaccines. Trends Microbiol, (6): 23–27.
doi:10.1016/S0966‐842X(97)01145‐1
14 Lampson G P, Tytell A A, Nemes M M, Hilleman M R (1963). Purification and characterization of chick embryo interferon. Proceedings Society Experimental Biology and Medicine, 112: 468–478
15 Luft T, Pang K C, Thomas E, Hertzog P, Hart D N, Trapani J, Cebon J (1998). Type I IFNs enhance the terminal differentiation of dendritic cells. J Immunol, 161: 1947–1953
16 Radvanyi L G, Banerjee A, Weir M, Messner H (1999). Low levels of interferon-α induce CD86 (B7.2)expression and accelerates dendritic cell maturation from human peripheralblood mononuclear cells.Scand J Immunol, 50(5): 499–509.
doi:10.1046/j.1365‐3083.1999.00625.x
17 Roitt I, Brostoff J, Male D (2001). Immunology. 6th ed.USA: Harcourt Asia Pte Ltd, 113–125
18 Santini S M, Lapenta C, Logozzi M, Parlato S, Spada M, Di Pucchio T, Belardelli F (2000). Type I interferon as a powerful adjuvant for monocyte-deriveddendritic cell development and activity invitro and in Hu-PBL-scid mice. J Exp Med, 191(10): 1777–1788.
doi:10.1084/jem.191.10.1777
19 Schuhz U, Kock J, Schlicht H J, Staeheli P (1995). Recombinant duck interferon: a new reagent for studyingthe mode of interferon action against hepatitis B virus. Virology, 212(2): 641–649.
doi:10.1006/viro.1995.1522
20 Spector D L, Goldman R D, Leinwand L A (1998). Cell: A Laboratory Manual. 3rd ed.New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 44–50
21 Tamir A, Jordan W J, Ritter M, Habib N, Lechler R I, Foster G R (2005). Interferon-alpha 2a is sufficient for promoting dendriticcell immunogenicity. Clin Exp Immunol, 142(3): 471–80
22 Tang D C, Devit M, Johnston S A (1992). Genetic immunization in a singlemethod for eliciting an immune response. Nature, 365: 152–154.
doi:10.1038/356152a0
23 Tompkins W A (1999). Immunomodulation and therapeutic effects of the oraluse of interferon-alpha: mechanism of action. Journal of Interferon & Cytokine Research, 19(8): 817–828.
doi:10.1089/107999099313325
24 Weining K C, Schuhz U, Münster U, Kaspers B, Staeheli P (1996). Biologicalproperties of recombinant chicken interferon-gamma. Eur J Immunol, 26: 2440–2447.
doi:10.1002/eji.1830261026
25 Wells D J, Goldspink G (1992). Age andsex influence expression of plasmid DNA directly injected into mouseskeletal muscle. FEBS Lett, 306(2/3): 203–205.
doi:10.1016/0014‐5793(92)81000‐C
26 Zhang H X, Zhang W, Luo Y F, Wen Y M (1990). Studies on blastogenesis of duck peripheral blood lymphocytes. Shanghai Journal of Immunology, 10(5): 262–264 (in Chinese)
27 Zhao J, Zhu F C, Shu Y L, Zhou R, Liu L Q, Zhang L L, Shi Z Y, Tang Z, Lin L Z, Yu Z A, Zhang L P, Zhang B, Hou Y D (2005). Preliminary study on nasal sprayof interferon α-2b used for prevention of rubella and measlesvirus infections. Chinese J Exp Clin Viro, 19(3): 220–222 (in Chinese)
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed