Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Agriculture in China

ISSN 1673-7334

ISSN 1673-744X(Online)

CN 11-5729/S

Front Agric Chin    2011, Vol. 5 Issue (2) : 141-145    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11703-011-1071-9
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Comparative studies on some yield contributing traits of wheat sown in binary mixtures
Sabina ASGHAR1, Muhammad KASHIF2(), Abdus Salam KHAN2, Ihsan KHALIQ2, Jehanzeb FAROOQ1
1. Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad, Pakistan; 2. Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan
 Download: PDF(95 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Cultivar mixtures have been suggested as ways to increase crop productivity. This field study was conducted to investigate the competition among five cultivated varieties of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) for the traits like plant height, flag leaf area, fertile tillers per plant, spike length, spikelets per spike, spike density, grain weight per spike, and seed index in relation to competition with yield per plant. It was observed that cultivar mixtures ought to be more productive than corresponding pure stands. Four binary combinations of Seher2006-Kohistan97, Farid2006-SH2002, SH2002-Shahkar95, and SH2002-Kohistan97 were superior in performance, showing land equivalent ratio (LER) values greater than one for plant height, fertile tillers per plant, spike density, grain weight per spike, and grain yield per plant. It was observed that the performance of binary mixtures was mainly due to the increased average performance in spike density, grain weight per spike, and grain yield per plant. The competitive ability of wheat varieties in mixtures was independent of each other for the respective traits, which lead to cumulative effects for the increased performance within the associates in mixtures.

Keywords wheat      binary mixtures      land equivalent ratio (LER)      grain yield     
Corresponding Author(s): KASHIF Muhammad,Email:mkashifpbg@yahoo.com, jehanzeb1763@hotmail.com   
Issue Date: 05 June 2011
 Cite this article:   
Sabina ASGHAR,Muhammad KASHIF,Abdus Salam KHAN, et al. Comparative studies on some yield contributing traits of wheat sown in binary mixtures[J]. Front Agric Chin, 2011, 5(2): 141-145.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fag/EN/10.1007/s11703-011-1071-9
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fag/EN/Y2011/V5/I2/141
Source of variationDFPlant height (cm)Flag leaf area (cm2)Tillers per plantSpike length (cm)Spikelets per spikeSpike densityGrain weight per spike (g)Seed index (g)Grain yield per plant
Replications221.1*26.93*0.0030.073.16*0.03*0.12*0.08*1.8
Varieties/biblends2454.1*16.57*2.11*0.82*2.53*0.04*0.26*0.59*54.8*
Error4813.16.731.330.622.020.010.030.032.5
Tab.1  Analysis of variance for some important yield contributing traits of wheat
Genotype combinationsPlant height (cm)Flag leaf area (cm2)Tillers per plantSpike length (cm)Spikelets per spikeSpike densityGrain weight per spike (g)Seed index (g)Grain yield per plant (g)
Seher2006-Farid20064.02-5.29-1.40-3.66-0.863.641.20-9.731.43
(1.04)(0.95)(0.99)(0.96)(0.99)(1.04)(1.03)(0.89)(1.03)
Seher2006-SH2002-4.18-19.031.48-4.55-5.260.645.18-5.450.62
(0.96)(0.81)(1.01)(0.95)(0.95)(1.01)(1.06)(0.94)(1.01)
Seher2006-Kohistan971.463.085.53-0.550.491.26-2.11-8.221.91
(1.01)(1.03)(1.05)(0.99)(1.01)(1.01)(0.98)(0.92)(1.02)
Seher2006-Shahkar95-0.66-9.43-0.890.28-3.45-3.66-1.420.544.47
(0.99)(0.91)(1.01)(1.00)(0.97)(0.97)(0.99)(0.99)(1.05)
Farid2006-SH 20020.79-7.351.43-5.70-4.841.261.581.236.25
(1.01)(0.93)(1.02)(0.94)(0.95)(1.01)(1.02)(1.02)(1.06)
Farid2006-Kohistan97-0.33-5.397.77-4.53-2.621.85-2.92-2.304.56
(0.99)(0.95)(1.08)(0.95)(0.97)(1.02)(0.96)(0.98)(1.05)
Farid2006-Shahkar952.911.53-6.42-3.01-3.95-0.602.94-1.621.33
(1.03)(1.02)(0.94)(0.97)(0.96)(0.99)(1.03)(0.99)(1.01)
SH 2002-Kohistan970.78-4.5612.641.64-0.99-2.592.48-5.561.52
(1.01)(0.96)(1.13)(1.02)(0.99)(0.98)(1.03)(0.95)(1.01)
SH2002-Shahkar95-0.44-7.290.000.712.493.790.25-1.647.59
(0.99)(0.94)(1.01)(1.01)(1.02)(1.03)(1.01)(0.98)(1.09)
Kohistan97-Shahkar951.29-2.12-4.29-1.81-1.960.001.10-4.35-0.60
(1.01)(0.98)(0.96)(0.98)(0.98)(1.00)(1.01)(0.96)(0.99)
Tab.2  Percent (%) increase or decrease of genotypes over the midparents and LER values (Parenthesis) of different binary mixtures of wheat
Varieties/ combinationsPlant height (cm)Flag leaf area (cm2)Tillers per plantSpike length (cm)Spikelets per spikeSpike densityGrain weight per spike (g)Seed index (g)Grain yield per plant (g)
Seher200695.21 ghi30.64f6.56abc12.47bcde20.20abcd1.62cdef2.43ef3.90m41.74efgh
Farid200682.36ab24.49abcd7.70efg12.93bcde21.60de1.66def1.60ab2.67bc38.69cdef
SH200288.93cdef29.70ef6.96bcd13.03bcde19.70abcd1.51bcd2.20cdef3.80kkm40.67defgh
Kohistan9789.83def25.16abcd7.36cd13.11cde20.40bcd1.55bcde1.83abcd3.40efghi32.54abc
Shahkar9586.94abcde23.82abc8.03def12.29bcd20.40bcd1.66def1.80abc3.50fghij31.39ab
Seher2006-Farid200696.35 ghi28.12def6.60abc12.35bcd20.03abcd1.62cdef2.29cdef363ijkl43.11hi
Seher2006-SH200289.83def24.15abc6.36a11.21a18.77ab1.68ef2.20cdef3.87lm42.53 ghi
Seher2006-Kohistan9796.97hi30.95f6.53ab12.49bcde20.30abcd1.62cdef2.37def3.37efgh41.43efgh
Seher2006-Shahkar9596.66hi26.78cde7.93cdef12.46bcde19.90abcd1.59bcde2.40def4.20n43.00hi
Farid2006-Seher200687.33bcdef24.10abc7.46cde12.12abc21.40cde1.78fg1.79abc2.30a38.47bcde
Farid2006-SH200283.18ab24.47abc7.31cd12.01abc20.20abcd1.68def1.73abc2.83c40.15defg
Farid2006-Kohistan9782.13a21.73a8.10efg12.37bcd20.37abcd1.64def1.40a2.57b39.87cdef
Farid2006-Shahkar9576.01abcd22.59ab7.36cd12.14abc20.30abcd1.67def1.69ab2.77bc39.17cdef
SH2002-Seher200686.60abcde24.71abcd7.36cd13.13cde19.10abc1.46ab2.67f3.40efghi40.39defg
SH2002-Farid200689.46def25.73bcd7.56cde12.47bcde19.13abc1.53bcde2.13cde3.73jklm44.17i
SH2002-Kohistan9789.01cdef26.08bcd8.10efg13.31de19.53abc1.46abc2.14cde3.33efg41.77fghi
SH2002-Shahkar9588.96cdef25.32abcd8.13fg13.52e18.37a1.35a2.11cde3.57 ghijk40.53defg
Kohistan97-Seher 200691.39efg26.57cde8.16 g12.95bcde20.53bcd1.58bcde1.80abc3.33efg34.27bcd
Kohistan97-Farid200689.49def25.26abcd8.13fg12.49bcde20.66bcd1.65def1.93bcd3.37efgh34.61bcd
Kohistan97-SH200292.14fgh26.28cde8.03def13.26de20.23abcd1.52bcde1.99bcd3.47efghi32.55abc
Kohistan97-Shahkar9592.32fgh23.65abc8.20 g12.90bcde20.10abcd1.56bcde1.97bcd3.53 ghij31.51ab
Shahkar95-Seher200684.28abc22.54ab6.53ab12.37bc19.33abc1.57bcde1.77abc3.23de33.40abc
Shahkar95-Farid200688.21cdef26.46cde7.36cd12.32bcd20.03abcd1.62cdef1.81abcd3.30ef30.74a
Shahkar95-SH200286.12abcd24.29abc6.86bcd11.98ab22.87e1.90 g1.90bcd3.60hijk35.83bcde
Shahkar95-Kohistan9786.73abcde24.28abc6.53ab12.04abc19.90abcd1.65def1.70abc3.07d30.95a
Tab.3  Statistical significance of some important yield contributing traits in pure and mixture stands of wheat
1 Alexander H M, Roelfs A P, Cobbs G (1986). Effects of disease and plant competition on yield in monocultures and mixtures of two wheat cultivars. Plant Pathol , 35(4): 457-465
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.1986.tb02043.x
2 Bowden R, Shoyer J, Roozeboom K, Claasen M, Evans P, Gordon B, Heer B, Janssen K, Schlegel J, Sears R, Witt M (2001). Performance of wheat variety blends in Kansas. Kansas Station Extension Bulletin : 128
3 Cousens R D, Weaver S E, Martin T D, Blair A M, Wilson J (1991). Dynamics of competition between wild oats (Avena fatua L.) and winter cereals. Weed Res , 31(4): 203-210
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1991.tb01759.x
4 Cowger C, Weisz R (2008). Winter wheat blend (mixtures) produce a yield advantage in North Carolina. J Agron , 100(1): 169-177
doi: 10.2134/agrojnl2007.0128
5 DeWit C T, Den Bergh J P V (1965). Competition between herbage plants. Neth J Agric Sci , 13: 212-221
6 Economic Survey of Pakistan (2009). Government of Pakistan, Ministry of Food Agriculture and Livestock, Federal Bureau of Statistics, Economic Advisor Wing, Islamabad, Pakistan
7 Finckh M R, Gacek E S, Goyeau H, Lannou C, Merz U, Mundt C C, Munk L, Nadziak J, Newton A C, de Vallavieille-Pope C, Wolfe M S (2000). Cereal variety and species mixtures in practice, with emphasis on disease resistance. Agronomie , 20(7): 813-837
doi: 10.1051/agro:2000177
8 Gallandt E R, Dofing S M, Reisenauer P E, Donaldson E (2001). Diallel analysis of cultivar mixtures in winter wheat. Crop Sci , 41(3): 792-796
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2001.413792x
9 Lee K M, Shroyer J P, Hermann T J, Lingenfelser J (2006). Blending hard white wheat to improve grain yield and end-use performances. Crop Sci , 46(3): 1124-1129
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2005.07-0184
10 Mundt C C (2002). Use of multiline cultivars and cultivar mixtures for disease management. Annual Rev Phytopathol , 40(1): 381-410
doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.40.011402.113723 pmid:12147765
11 Newton A C, Christine A H, Swanston J S (2008). Analysing the contribution of component cultivars and cultivar combinations to malting quality, yield and disease in complex mixtures. J Science Food Agriculture , 88(12): 2142-2152
doi: 10.1002/jsfa.3326
12 Newton A C, Swanston J S, Guy D C, Ellis R P (1998). Cereal variety mixtures reduce inputs and improve yield and quality - why isn’t everybody growing them? J Inst Brew , 104: 41-45
13 Sobkowicz P, Tendziagolska E (2005). Competition and productivity in mixture of oats and wheat. J Agron Crop Sci , 191(5): 377-385
doi: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2005.00169.x
14 Steel R G D, Torrie J H, Dickey D A (1997). Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A Biochemical Approach . New York: McGraw Hill Book International Co
15 Swanston J S, Newton A C, Brosnan J M, Fotheringham A, Glasgow E (2005). Determining the spirit yield of wheat varieties and variety mixtures. J Cereal Sci , 42(1): 127-134
doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2005.02.001
16 Tratwal A, Law J, Philpott H, Horwell A, Garner J (2007). The possibilities of reduction of winter barley chemical protection by growing variety mixtures. Part II. Effect on yield. Journal of Plant Protection Research , 47(1): 87-99
17 Treder K, Wanic M, Nowicki J (2008a). Competition between spring wheat and spring barley under conditions of diversified fertilization part I. Influence on selected morphological characteristics of plants. Acta Agrophysica , 11(3): 767-780
18 Treder K, Wanic M, Nowicki J (2008b). Competition between spring wheat and spring barley under conditions of diversified fertilization part II. Influence on biomass of plants and rate of its accumulation. Acta Agrophysica , 11(3): 781-797
[1] Lifeng ZHANG, Aihua YAN, Dong TIAN, Shengfang HAN, Dongmei WANG. Cloning and prokaryotic expression of translationally controlled tumor protein (TaTCTP) gene from wheat and preparation of antiserum[J]. Front Agric Chin, 2011, 5(4): 473-478.
[2] Lihua LV, Huijun WANG, Xiuling JIA, Zhimin WANG. Analysis on water requirement and water-saving amount of wheat and corn in typical regions of the North China Plain[J]. Front Agric Chin, 2011, 5(4): 556-562.
[3] Lifeng ZHANG, Hui ZHOU, Fengju WEI, Ziyi CHENG, Aihua YAN, Dongmei WANG. Construction of yeast two-hybrid cDNA libraries for wheat near-isogenic line TcLr19 under the stress of Puccinia recondita and its preliminary appreciation[J]. Front Agric Chin, 2011, 5(4): 450-455.
[4] Shahid Iqbal AWAN, Muhammad Shahzad AHMED, Jehanzeb FAROOQ, Syed Dilnawaz AHMAD, Muhammad ILYAS, Asad Hussain SHAH, Muhammad Fareed KHAN, Sardar ALI, Lutful HASAN. Genetic model analysis on seedling and maturity traits in wheat under rainfed conditions[J]. Front Agric Chin, 2011, 5(4): 486-496.
[5] Yunwei ZHANG, Xiang GAO, Shengfang HAN, Dongmei WANG. Cloning and prokaryotic expression of TaE3 from wheat and preparation of antiserum[J]. Front Agric Chin, 2011, 5(4): 437-442.
[6] Wenjing LU, Jincai LI, Fangpeng LIU, Juntao GU, Chengjin GUO, Liu XU, Huiyan ZHANG, Kai XIAO. Expression pattern of wheat miRNAs under salinity stress and prediction of salt-inducible miRNAs targets[J]. Front Agric Chin, 2011, 5(4): 413-422.
[7] Chengjin GUO, Jincai LI, Wensuo CHANG, Lijun ZHANG, Xirong CUI, Shuwen LI, Kai XIAO. Effects of chromosome substitution on the utilization efficiency of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in wheat[J]. Front Agric Chin, 2011, 5(3): 253-261.
[8] Shan LI, Yongsheng ZHANG, Yanan WANG, Chunqi LIANG, Wenchao ZHEN. The control effect of a multifunctional bacterial agent fit for straw amendment against wheat soil-borne diseases[J]. Front Agric Chin, 2011, 5(3): 305-309.
[9] Xirong CUI, Yongsheng ZHANG, Fanghua ZHAO, Chengjin GUO, Juntao GU, Wenjing LU, Xiaojuan LI, Kai XIAO. Molecular characterization and expression analysis of phosphate transporter gene TaPT2-1 in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)[J]. Front Agric Chin, 2011, 5(3): 274-283.
[10] Muhammad Shahzad AHMED, Ihsan KHALIQ, Jehanzeb FAROOQ, Shahid Iqbal AWAN, Nisar AHMED, Faisal Saeed AWAN. Assessment of the combining ability and authentication of F1 hybrids using SSR markers in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)[J]. Front Agric Chin, 2011, 5(2): 135-140.
[11] Mueen Alam KHAN, Muhammad IQBAL. Breeding for drought tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): constraints and future prospects[J]. Front Agric Chin, 2011, 5(1): 31-34.
[12] Jinhua WU, Zhiying MA, Yingang HU, Hong ZHANG, Changyou WANG, Qiuying WANG, Wanquan JI, . Expression of special genes inhibited by powdery mildew ( Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici ) in wheat germplasm N9436[J]. Front. Agric. China, 2010, 4(1): 10-17.
[13] Na ZHANG, Wenxiang YANG, Daqun LIU, Shengliang YUAN, . Identification of Lr24 with targeted region amplified polymorphism (TRAP) analysis in wheat[J]. Front. Agric. China, 2010, 4(1): 18-23.
[14] Aihua YAN, Yunwei ZHANG, Lifeng ZHANG, Dongmei WANG, . Cloning and expression analysis of a ribosomal protein S7 in wheat under the stress of Puccinia triticina[J]. Front. Agric. China, 2009, 3(4): 413-418.
[15] Yanqin LI, Xiaoling FAN, Tonglin SHI, Quanbin ZHANG, Zongwen ZHANG, . SRAP marker reveals genetic diversity in tartary buckwheat in China[J]. Front. Agric. China, 2009, 3(4): 383-387.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed