Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Agriculture in China

ISSN 1673-7334

ISSN 1673-744X(Online)

CN 11-5729/S

Front Agric Chin    2009, Vol. 3 Issue (3) : 253-258    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11703-009-0058-2
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Studies on induction of chlorophyll mutations in soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merrill
Mudasir Hafiz KHAN(), Sunil Dutt TYAGI
Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Kisan (P. G.), College, Simbhaoli, Ghaziabad, affiliated to CCS University, Meerut (U. P) 190009, India
 Download: PDF(194 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The phenotypic response of two soybean cultivars to a chemical mutagen (ethyl methane sulphonate, EMS), physical mutagen (gamma rays) and their combinations were studied in M1 and M2 generations and the frequency and spectrum of chlorophyll mutations were worked out. Combined treatment was found to be more effective in inducing chlorophyll mutations compared to individual treatments of gamma rays and EMS in both the cultivars. As far as the spectrum of chlorophyll mutations is concerned, a wider spectrum in both the cultivars was observed in 45 kR + 0.2% EMS combined treatment.

Keywords chlorophyll mutations      gamma rays      ethyl methane sulphonate      soybean     
Corresponding Author(s): KHAN Mudasir Hafiz,Email:kmudasirhafiz@yahoo.com   
Issue Date: 05 September 2009
 Cite this article:   
Mudasir Hafiz KHAN,Sunil Dutt TYAGI. Studies on induction of chlorophyll mutations in soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merrill[J]. Front Agric Chin, 2009, 3(3): 253-258.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fag/EN/10.1007/s11703-009-0058-2
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fag/EN/Y2009/V3/I3/253
1 Bhatia C, Swaminathan M S (1963). Frequency and spectrum of mutations induced by radiations in some varieties of bread wheat. Euphytica , 12: 97-112
2 Blixt S (1968). Studies on induced mutations in peas XXIV genetically conditioned differences in radiation sensitivity 2. Hereditas , 59: 303-328
3 Das P K, Kundagrami S (2000). Frequency and spectra of chlorophyll mutations in grasspea induced by gamma rays. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding , 60(2): 239-241
4 Gaul H (1964). Mutations in plant breeding. Rad Bot , 13: 330-336
5 Geetha K, Vaidyanathan P (2000). Studies on induction of chlorophyll mutation in soybean through physical and chemical mutagens. Agricultural Science Digest , 20(1): 33-35
6 Goud J V (1967). Induced polygenic mutations in hexaploid wheat. Radiation Biology , 7: 321-331
doi: 10.1016/0033-7560(67)90021-X
7 Gregory W C (1965). Mutation frequency, magnitude of changes and the probability of improvement in adaptation: In the use of induced mutation in plant breeding. Rep FAO/I A E A, Tech Meet Rome , 429-441
8 Gustafsson A (1940). The mutation system of chlorophyll apparatus. Lund Univ Arsskr N E Avd , 2(36): 1-40
9 Harb R K H (1990). Frequency, spectrum, anatomical and chemical studies on soybean chlorophyll mutations. Bulletin Faculty Agric Univ Cario , 41(3): 595-608
10 Paul A, Singh D P (2002). Induced chlorophyll mutations in lentil (Lens culnaris Medik). Indian Journal Genet , 63(3): 263-264
11 Prasad A B, Das A K (1980). Studies in induced chlorophyll mutations in Lathyrus sativus L. Cytologia , 45: 335-341
12 Rajput M A, Sarwar G (1996). Radiation induced chlorophyll mutations in lentil. Lens-Newsletter , 23(1/2): 3-4
13 Solanki I S, Phogat D S (2005). Chlorophyll mutation induction and mutagenic effectiveness and efficiency in macrosperma lentil (Lens culnaris Medik.). National Journal of Plant Improvement , 7(2): 81-85
14 Zareen F, Devi P (1995). Mutagenic effectiveness and efficiency of certain mutagens in Brassica compestris. Journal of Cytology and Genetics , 30(1): 7-12
[1] Mohd Rafiq WANI, Samiullah KHAN, Mohammad Imran KOZGAR. Induced chlorophyll mutations. I. Mutagenic effectiveness and efficiency of EMS, HZ and SA in mungbean[J]. Front Agric Chin, 2011, 5(4): 514-518.
[2] Dongjin XIONG, Tuanjie ZHAO, Junyi GAI. Genetic bases of improved soybean cultivars released from 1923 to 2005 in China—A historical review[J]. Front Agric Chin, 2010, 4(4): 383-393.
[3] Paul C. KORIR, Jinshe WANG, Tuanjie ZHAO, Junyi GAI, . Genetic analysis of tolerance to aluminum toxin at seedling stage in soybean based on major gene plus polygene mixed inheritance model[J]. Front. Agric. China, 2010, 4(3): 265-271.
[4] Paul C. KORIR, Tuanjie ZHAO, Junyi GAI, . A study on indicators and evaluation stages of aluminum tolerance in soybean[J]. Front. Agric. China, 2010, 4(3): 280-286.
[5] Xihuan LI, Wensuo CHANG, Caiying ZHANG, Junyi GAI, . Identification of phosphorus starvation tolerant soybean ( Glycine max ) germplasms[J]. Front. Agric. China, 2010, 4(3): 272-279.
[6] Mudasir Hafiz KHAN, Sunil Dutt TYAGI, . Induced morphological mutants in soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merrill][J]. Front. Agric. China, 2010, 4(2): 175-180.
[7] GUO Li, WANG Jiaojiao, XIAO Kai. Isolation and characterization of a novel phytase gene () from soybean ( (L.) Merr.)[J]. Front. Agric. China, 2008, 2(1): 30-36.
[8] DENG Junming, MAI Kangsen, AI Qinghui, ZHANG Wenbing. Effects of soybean oligosaccharides on lipid metabolism of Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus Temminck et Schlegel) fed animal or plant protein source-based diets[J]. Front. Agric. China, 2007, 1(3): 315-323.
[9] NING Hailong, LI Wenxia, LI Wenbin. Analysis of embryo, cytoplasm and maternal effects on fatty acid components in soybean (Glycine max Merill.)[J]. Front. Agric. China, 2007, 1(3): 276-280.
[10] Junyi GAI,Yongjun WANG,Xiaolei WU,Shouyi CHEN. A comparative study on segregation analysis and QTL mapping of quantitative traits in plants—with a case in soybean[J]. Front. Agric. China, 2007, 1(1): 1-7.
[11] Qinggele CAIYIN,Mingchun LI,Dongsheng WEI,Yi CAI,Laijun XING. Isolation and sequencing analysis on the seed-specific promoter from soybean[J]. Front. Agric. China, 2007, 1(1): 17-23.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed