|
|
|
A modified rectangular hyperbola to describe
the light-response curve of photosynthesis of Bidens pilosa L. grown under low and high light conditions |
| Zipiao YE1,Zehai ZHAO2, |
| 1.Research Center for
Jinggangshan Eco-Environmental Sciences, Jinggangshan University;
College of Sciences, Jinggangshan University, Ji’an 343009,
China; 2.College of Life Sciences,
Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing 526061, China; |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The light-response curve of leaf net photosynthesis is an important tool for understanding the photochemical efficiency of the photosynthetic process. We measured the light-response of the photosynthetic rate of Bidens pilosa L., when grown under high light of 100% full sunlight (HL) and low light of 50% full sunlight (LL) using a gas analyzer Li-6400. The measured data were simulated by a modified rectangular hyperbola. The fitted results showed that the modified rectangular hyperbola described the part of the curve up to the light saturation and the range of levels above the saturation light intensity in Bidens pilosa L. well. It was used to directly calculate the main photosynthetic parameters, including the light-saturated net photosynthetic rate (Pmax), saturation light intensity (Im), light compensation point (Ic), dark respiration rate, and the initial slope of curve without any additional hypotheses. Good agreement was obtained between the modified rectangular hyperbola estimates and observations of Pmax and Im of B. pilosa under LH and LL conditions. Furthermore, the modified rectangular hyperbola provided a very easy and simple method for simultaneously simulating the data on the light-response curve of photosynthesis at low irradiances, saturating irradiances, photoacclimation and photoinhibition.
|
| Keywords
apparent quantum yield
initial slope
light-saturated net photosynthetic rate
saturation light intensity
|
|
Issue Date: 05 March 2010
|
|
|
Amiard V, Mueh K E, Demmig-Adams B, Ebbert V, Turgeon R, Adams W W(2005). Anatomical and photosynthetic acclimationto the light environment in species with differing mechanisms of phloemloading. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 102: 12968–12973
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503784102
|
|
Baly E C(1935). The kinetics of photosynthesis. Proc Roy Soc, B117: 218–239
doi: 10.1098/rspb.1935.0026
|
|
Bassman J, Zwier J C(1991). Gas exchangecharacteristics of Populus trichocarpa, Populusdeltroids and Populus trichocarpa×P.deltroids clone. Tree Physiol, 8: 145–149
|
|
Boonman A, Prinsen E, Gilmer F, Schurr U, Petters A J M, Voesenek L, Pons T L(2007). Cytokinin import rate as a signal for photosynthetic acclimationto canopy light gradients. Plant Physiol, 143: 1841–1852
doi: 10.1104/pp.106.094631
|
|
Evans J G, Jakonbsen I, Ögren E(1993). Photosynthetic light-response curves.2: Gradients of light absorption and photosynthetic capacity. Planta, 189: 191–200
|
|
Evans J R, Poorter H(2001). Photosyntheticacclimation of plants to growth irradiance: the relative importanceof specific leaf area and nitrogen partitioning in maximizing carbongain. Plant, Cell Environ, 24: 755–767
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00724.x
|
|
Farquhar G D, Caemmerer S, Berry J A(1980). A biochemical model of photosyntheticCO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta, 149: 78–90
doi: 10.1007/BF00386231
|
|
Kyei-Boahen S, Lada R, Astatkie T, Gordon R, Caldwell C(2003). Photosyntheticresponse of carrots to varying irradiances. Photosynthetica, 41: 1–5
doi: 10.1023/B:PHOT.0000011967.74465.cc
|
|
Lambers H, Chapin F S, Pons T L(1998). Plant Physiological Ecology. New York: Springer
|
|
Leakey A D B, Uribelarrea M, Ainsworth E A, Naidu S L, Pogers A, Ort D R, Long S P(2006). Photosynthesis,productivity, and yield of maize are not affected by Open-Air elevationof CO2 concentration in the absence of drought. Plant Physiol, 140: 779–790
doi: 10.1104/pp.105.073957
|
|
Long S P, Humpheris S, Falkowski P G(1994). Photoinhibition of photosynthesisin nature. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 45: 633–662
doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.45.060194.003221
|
|
Marshall H L, Geider R J, Flynn K J(2000). A mechanistic model of photoinhibition. New Phytol, 145: 347–359
doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00575.x
|
|
Murchie E H, Hubbert S, Chen Y Z, Peng S B, Horton P(2002). Acclimation of ricephotosynthesis to irradiance under field conditions. Plant Physiol, 130: 1999–2010
doi: 10.1104/pp.011098
|
|
Ögren E, Evans J R(1993). Photosyntheticlight-response curves I. the influenceof CO2 partial pressure and leaf inversion.Planta, 189: 182–190
|
|
Olsson T, Leverenz J W(1994). Non-uniformstomata closure and the apparent convexity of the photosynthetic photonflux density response curve. Plant, CellEnviron, 17: 701–710
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1994.tb00162.x
|
|
Richardson A, Berlyn G(2002). Changesin foliar spectral reflectance and chlorophyll fluorescence of fourtemperate species following branch cutting. Tree Physiol, 22: 499–506
|
|
Robert E S, Mark A, John S B(1984). Kok effect and the quantum yieldof photosynthesis. Plant Physiol, 75: 95–101
doi: 10.1104/pp.75.1.95
|
|
Thornley J H M(1976). Mathematical Models in Plant Physiology. London: Academic Press
|
|
Walker D A(1989). Automated measurement of leaf photosynthetic O2 evolution as a function of photon flux density. Philos T R Soc, B323: 313–326
doi: 10.1098/rstb.1989.0013
|
|
Walters R G, Shephard F, Rogers J J M, Rolfe S A, Horton P(2003). Identification ofmutants of Arabidopsis defectivein acclimation of photosynthesis to the light environment. Plant Physiol, 131: 472–481
doi: 10.1104/pp.015479
|
|
Ye Z P(2007). A new model for relationship between light intensityand the rate of photosynthesis in Oryza sativa. Photosynthetica, 45: 637–640
doi: 10.1007/s11099-007-0110-5
|
|
Yu Q, Zhang Y Q, Liu Y F, Shi P L(2004). Simulation of the stomatal conductance of winter wheat in responseto light, temperature and CO2 changes. Ann Bot, 93: 435–441
doi: 10.1093/aob/mch023
|
|
Zhou Y H, Lan H M, Zhang J H(2007). Inhibition of photosynthesis andenergy dissipation induced by water and high light stresses in rice. J Exp Bot, 58: 1207–1217
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erl291
|
|
Zonneveld C(1998). Photoinhibition as affected by photoacclimation in phytoplankton:a model approach. J Theor Biol, 193: 115–123
doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1998.0688
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
