1. National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China 2. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China 3. Guangdong Wen’s Breeding Swine Co. Ltd., Yunfu 527400, China
Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT)-derived piglets have significantly higher stillbirth rate and postnatal mortality rate than artificial insemination (AI)-generated piglets. The question whether the low survival rate of SCNT piglets was related to birth weight, umbilical cord or placenta development was investigated. In this study, stillbirth rate, neonatal death rate, birth weight, umbilical cord status, placental parameters and placental gene expression patterns were compared between SCNT and AI piglets. Results showed that mortality rates at birth and during the neonatal stage of SCNT piglets were significantly higher than those of AI piglets. The incidence of abnormal umbilical cord in SCNT and SCNT-liveborn (SCNT-LB) piglets was significantly higher than in AI and AI-liveborn (AI-LB) piglets. Birth weight, placental weight, placental surface area and placental efficiency in SCNT and SCNT-LB piglets were significantly lower than those of AI and AI-LB piglets. Placental expression profiles of imprinting, angiopoiesis and nutrient transport-related genes were defective in SCNT-LB piglets compared with those in AI-LB piglets. Thus, the low survival rate of SCNT piglets may be associated with abnormal umbilical cord and placenta development. These characteristics may have resulted from aberrant expression of angiogenesis, nutrient transport, and imprinting-related genes in the placentas.
YKuroiwa, P Kasinathan, Y JChoi, RNaeem, KTomizuka, E JSullivan, J GKnott, ADuteau, R AGoldsby, B AOsborne, IIshida, J MRobl. Cloned transchromosomic calves producing human immunoglobulin. Nature Biotechnology, 2002, 20(9): 889–894 https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt727
pmid: 12172556
2
K HCampbell, P Fisher, W CChen, IChoi, R D Kelly, J H Lee, J Xhu. Somatic cell nuclear transfer: past, present and future perspectives. Theriogenology, 2007, 68(S1): S214–S231 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.05.059
pmid: 17610946
3
XYang, S L Smith, X C Tian, H A Lewin, J P Renard, T Wakayama. Nuclear reprogramming of cloned embryos and its implications for therapeutic cloning. Nature Genetics, 2007, 39(3): 295–302 https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1973
pmid: 17325680
4
HMatsunari, H Nagashima. Application of genetically modified and cloned pigs in translational research. Journal of Reproduction and Development, 2009, 55(3): 225–230 https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.20164
pmid: 19571468
5
I EHolm, A K O Alstrup, Y Luo. Genetically modified pig models for neurodegenerative disorders. Journal of Pathology, 2016, 238(2): 267–287 https://doi.org/10.1002/path.4654
pmid: 26446984
6
YLiu, J Li, PLøvendahl, MSchmidt, KLarsen, HCallesen. In vitro manipulation techniques of porcine embryos: a meta-analysis related to transfers, pregnancies and piglets. Reproduction, Fertility, and Development, 2015, 27(3): 429–439 https://doi.org/10.1071/RD13329
pmid: 25482653
7
RGeisert, R Schmitt. Early embryonic survival in the pig: can it be improved? Journal of Animal Science, 2002, 80(S1): E54–E65
8
TLiu, H Dou, XXiang, LLi, Y Li, LLin, XPang, Y Zhang, YChen, JLuan, Y Xu, ZYang, WYang, H Liu, FLi, HWang, H Yang, LBolund, GVajta, YDu. Factors determining the efficiency of porcine somatic cell nuclear transfer: data analysis with over 200000 reconstructed embryos. Cellular Reprogramming, 2015, 17(6): 463–471 https://doi.org/10.1089/cell.2015.0037
pmid: 26655078
9
YHuan, K Hu, BXie, YShi, F Wang, YZhou, SLiu, B Huang, JZhu, ZLiu, Y He, JLi, QKong, Z Liu. Ovulation statuses of surrogate gilts are associated with the efficiency of excellent pig cloning. PLoS One, 2015, 10(11): e0142549 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142549
pmid: 26565717
10
JEstrada, J Sommer, BCollins, BMir, A Martin, AYork, R MPetters, J APiedrahita. Swine generated by somatic cell nuclear transfer have increased incidence of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Cloning and Stem Cells, 2007, 9(2): 229–236 https://doi.org/10.1089/clo.2006.0079
pmid: 17579555
11
MKurome, L Geistlinger, BKessler, VZakhartchenko, NKlymiuk, AWuensch, ARichter, ABaehr, KKraehe, KBurkhardt, KFlisikowski, TFlisikowska, CMerkl, MLandmann, MDurkovic, ATschukes, SKraner, DSchindelhauer, TPetri, AKind, H Nagashima, ASchnieke, RZimmer, EWolf. Factors influencing the efficiency of generating genetically engineered pigs by nuclear transfer: multi-factorial analysis of a large data set. BMC Biotechnology, 2013, 13(1): 43 https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-13-43
pmid: 23688045
12
J YPark, J H Kim, Y J Choi, K C Hwang, S K Cho, H H Park, S S Paik, T Kim, CPark, H TLee, H GSeo, S BPark, SHwang, J HKim. Comparative proteomic analysis of malformed umbilical cords from somatic cell nuclear transfer-derived piglets: implications for early postnatal death. BMC Genomics, 2009, 10(1): 511 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-511
pmid: 19889237
ZAo, D Liu, CZhao, ZYue, J Shi, RZhou, GCai, E Zheng, ZLi, ZWu. Birth weight, umbilical and placental traits in relation to neonatal loss in cloned pigs. Placenta, 2017, 57: 94–101 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2017.06.010
pmid: 28864025
15
Tvan der Lende, E FKnol, J ILeenhouwers. Prenatal development as a predisposing factor for perinatal losses in pigs. Reproduction Supplement, 2001, 58: 247–261
pmid: 11980194
16
J LVallet, J R Miles, T M Brown-Brandl, J A Nienaber. Proportion of the litter farrowed, litter size, and progesterone and estradiol effects on piglet birth intervals and stillbirths. Animal Reproduction Science, 2010, 119(1–2): 68–75 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.11.004
pmid: 20031344
17
VRootwelt, O Reksen, WFarstad, TFramstad. Postpartum deaths: piglet, placental, and umbilical characteristics. Journal of Animal Science, 2013, 91(6): 2647–2656 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5531
pmid: 23482582
18
B NMilligan, D Fraser, D LKramer. Within-litter birth weight variation in the domestic pig and its relation to pre-weaning survival, weight gain, and variation in weaning weights. Livestock Production Science, 2002, 76(1–2): 181–191 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00012-X
19
B NMilligan, D Fraser, D LKramer. Birth weight variation in the domestic pig: effects on offspring survival, weight gain and suckling behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2001, 73(3): 179–191 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00136-8
pmid: 11376836
20
AAntonides, A C Schoonderwoerd, R E Nordquist, F J van der Staay. Very low birth weight piglets show improved cognitive performance in the spatial cognitive holeboard task. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 2015, 9: 43 https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00043
pmid: 25774127
21
PChavatte-Palmer, S Camous, HJammes, NLe Cleac’h, MGuillomot, R SLee. Review: placental perturbations induce the developmental abnormalities often observed in bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer. Placenta, 2012, 33(S): S99–S104 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2011.09.012
pmid: 22000472
PLoi, M Clinton, IVackova, JFulka Jr, RFeil, C Palmieri, LDella Salda, GPtak. Placental abnormalities associated with post-natal mortality in sheep somatic cell clones. Theriogenology, 2006, 65(6): 1110–1121 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.07.016
pmid: 16154189
24
BVanderWielen, C Zaleski, CCold, EMcPherson. Wisconsin stillbirth services program: a multifocal approach to stillbirth analysis. American Journal of Medical Genetics: Part A, 2011, 155A(5): 1073–1080 https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.34016
pmid: 21480484
25
M AMiglino, F T V Pereira, J A Visintin, J M Garcia, F V Meirelles, R Rumpf, C EAmbrósio, P CPapa, T CSantos, A FCarvalho, RLeiser, A MCarter. Placentation in cloned cattle: structure and microvascular architecture. Theriogenology, 2007, 68(4): 604–617 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.04.060
pmid: 17568663
26
M EWilson, N J Biensen, C R Youngs, S P Ford. Development of Meishan and Yorkshire littermate conceptuses in either a Meishan or Yorkshire uterine environment to day 90 of gestation and to term. Biology of Reproduction, 1998, 58(4): 905–910 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod58.4.905
pmid: 9546719
27
M RPark, S K Cho, S Y Lee, Y J Choi, J Y Park, D N Kwon, W J Son, S S Paik, T Kim, Y MHan, J HKim. A rare and often unrecognized cerebromeningitis and hemodynamic disorder: a major cause of sudden death in somatic cell cloned piglets. Proteomics, 2005, 5(7): 1928–1939 https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200401079
pmid: 15832370
28
MAlonso-Spilsbury, DMota-Rojas, JMartínez-Burnes, EArch, ALópez Mayagoitia, R Ramírez-Necoechea, AOlmos, M ETrujillo. Use of oxytocin in penned sows and its effect on fetal intra-partum asphyxia. Animal Reproduction Science, 2004, 84(1–2): 157–167 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2003.11.002
pmid: 15302395
29
MAlonso-Spilsbury, DMota-Rojas, DVillanueva-García, JMartínez-Burnes, HOrozco, RRamírez-Necoechea, A LMayagoitia, M ETrujillo. Perinatal asphyxia pathophysiology in pig and human: a review. Animal Reproduction Science, 2005, 90(1–2): 1–30 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.01.007
pmid: 16257594
G CSmith, J A Crossley, D A Aitken, J P Pell, A D Cameron, J M Connor, R Dobbie. First-trimester placentation and the risk of antepartum stillbirth. Journal of the American Medical Association, 2004, 292(18): 2249–2254 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.18.2249
pmid: 15536112
32
JMan, J C Hutchinson, A E Heazell, M Ashworth, IJeffrey, N JSebire. Stillbirth and intrauterine fetal death: role of routine histopathological placental findings to determine cause of death. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2016, 48(5): 579–584 https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.16019
pmid: 27781319
33
S JTunster, H D J Creeth, R M John. The imprinted Phlda2 gene modulates a major endocrine compartment of the placenta to regulate placental demands for maternal resources. Developmental Biology, 2016, 409(1): 251–260 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.10.015
pmid: 26476147
34
EAngiolini, A Fowden, PCoan, ISandovici, PSmith, WDean, G Burton, BTycko, WReik, C Sibley, MConstancia. Regulation of placental efficiency for nutrient transport by imprinted genes. Placenta, 2006, 27(SA): S98–S102
35
WReik, M Constância, AFowden, NAnderson, WDean, A Ferguson-Smith, BTycko, CSibley. Regulation of supply and demand for maternal nutrients in mammals by imprinted genes. Journal of Physiology, 2003, 547(Pt 1): 35–44 https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2002.033274
pmid: 12562908