Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-7505

ISSN 2095-977X(Online)

CN 10-1204/S

Postal Subscription Code 80-906

Front. Agr. Sci. Eng.    2019, Vol. 6 Issue (4) : 313-320    https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2019282
REVIEW
Adaptation of Chinese and German maize-based food-feed-energy systems to limited phosphate resources—a new Sino-German international research training group
Torsten MÜLLER1(), Fusuo ZHANG2
1. Fertilization and Soil Matter Dynamics, Institute of Crop Science (340i), University of Hohenheim, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany
2. College of Resources and Environmental Science, Department of Plant Nutrition, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
 Download: PDF(640 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Phosphate is supplied to agriculture by mining and fertilizer production, followed by different steps of phosphate utilization, including primary production, feed and food consumption, and conversion of biomass, with accumulation in soils, but little recycling and severe environmental losses. Phosphate is a limited essential nutrient, however, with very uneven distribution worldwide. Closing the cycle and reducing primary phosphate consumption are fundamental future challenges. Maize has a relatively high phosphate requirement. China and Germany together cover the whole range of maize production systems. The new Sino-German international research training group “Adaptation of Chinese and German maize-based food-feed-energy systems to limited phosphate resources” (AMAIZE-P) was initiated in 2018 as a joint venture of the China Agricultural University (Beijing, China) and the University of Hohenheim (Stuttgart, Germany). The interdisciplinary and complementary research is driven by the hypothesis that under phosphate limited conditions, high productivity and high phosphate use efficiency can be achieved simultaneously by adapting phosphate cycling and availability (sources) to the multipurpose phosphate demands (sinks) in maize-based food-feed-energy systems. The educational program for doctoral researchers in China and Germany includes joint block seminars, thematic field trips, case studies, methodological courses, doctoral researchers’ conferences, intercultural training sessions and personal training.

Keywords international research training group      limited resources      maize      phosphate     
Corresponding Author(s): Torsten MÜLLER   
Just Accepted Date: 04 September 2019   Online First Date: 18 October 2019    Issue Date: 29 November 2019
 Cite this article:   
Torsten MÜLLER,Fusuo ZHANG. Adaptation of Chinese and German maize-based food-feed-energy systems to limited phosphate resources—a new Sino-German international research training group[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2019, 6(4): 313-320.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/EN/10.15302/J-FASE-2019282
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/EN/Y2019/V6/I4/313
Fig.1  The phosphate cycle today and in a future scenario with maximized phosphate use efficiency and minimized losses. Numbers in the future scenario refer to the research subjects described in Table 1. (a) Today; (b) future.
Fig.2  Maize-based agricultural food-feed-energy systems in China and Germany together represent all aspects of maize production in contrasting and complementing situations.
Subject area Research subject
1 Genetic potential 1.1 Genetic variation, genetic architecture and genomic prediction of phosphate-use-efficiency traits in European and Chinese maize
1.2 Importance of root architecture and rhizosphere-related processes for improving phosphate use efficiency
1.3 Regulatory modules of carbon resource allocation under different phosphate availabilities
2 Management at field and farm level 2.1 Genotype to phenotype modelling of phosphate acquisition and related yield and quality traits of maize
2.2 Increasing soil phosphate availability and phosphate fertilizer efficiency
2.3 Detecting phosphate status in soil and in maize canopies by non-invasive methods
2.4 Heavy metals from phosphate fertilizers in maize based food-feed-energy systems
3 Nutrition and recovery 3.1 The impact of reduced phosphate-availability on essential micronutrients in maize for human consumption
3.2 Inositol phosphates in the digestive tract and phosphate utilisation of farm animals fed maize
3.3 Deployment of phosphate resources for nutrient recycling via anaerobic digestion systems
3.4 Hydrothermal conversion of biomass to carbon materials with phosphate recovery
4 Economic evaluation and synthesis 4.1 Economic analyses at plot, farm enterprise, regional and sectoral levels
4.2 Synthesis and field experiments
Tab.1  Project structure
1 W Steffen, K Richardson, J Rockström, S E Cornell, I Fetzer, E M Bennett, R Biggs, S R Carpenter, W de Vries, C A de Wit, C Folke, D Gerten, J Heinke, G M Mace, L M Persson, V Ramanathan, B Reyers, S Sörlin. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 2015, 347(6223): 1259855
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855 pmid: 25592418
2 F Wiesler, K Hund-Rinke, S Gäth, E George, J M Greef, L E Hölzle, F Holz, K J Hülsbergen, R Pfeil, K Severin, H G Frede, B Blum, H Schenkel, W Horst, K Dittert, T Ebertseder, B Osterburg, W Philipp, M Pietsch. Application of organic fertilizers and organic residues in agriculture. Berlin: Scientific Board for Fertilization of the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture, 2015 (in German)
3 K Fricke, W Bidlingmaier. Phosphorus potential in high value organic municipal waste and its application. In: Proceedings of the UBA & ISA Phosphorus Conference Recycling of Phosphorus from Waste Water and Waste in Agriculture, Berlin. Aachen, Germany: Society for the Promotion of the Institute for Urban Water Management, 2003, 9/1–9/15 (in German)
4 Z Bai, L Ma, W Ma, W Qin, G L Velthof, O Oenema, F Zhang. Changes in phosphorus use and losses in the food chain of China during 1950–2010 and forecasts for 2030. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2016, 104(3): 361–372
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-015-9737-y
5 D L Childers, J Corman, M Edwards, J J Elser. Sustainability challenges of phosphorus and food: solutions from closing the human phosphorus cycle. Bioscience, 2011, 61(2): 117–124
https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.2.6
6 M Gross. Fears over phosphorus supplies. Current Biology, 2010, 20(9): 386–387
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.04.031
7 T S Neset, D Cordell. Global phosphorus scarcity: identifying synergies for a sustainable future. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2012, 92(1): 2–6
https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4650 pmid: 21969145
8 K Möller, A Oberson, E K Bünemann, J Cooper, J K Friedel, N Glæsner, S Hörtenhuber, A K Løes, P Mäder, G Meyer, T Müller, S Symanczik, L Weissengruber, I Wollmann, J Magid. Improved phosphorus cycling in organic farming: navigating between constraints. Advances in Agronomy, 2018, 147: 159–237
https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2017.10.004
9 M Taylor, N Kim, G Smidt, C Busby, S McNally, B Robinson, S Kratz, E Schnug. Trace element contaminants and radioactivity from phosphate fertilisers. In: Schnug E, De Kok L J, eds. Phosphorus in agriculture: 100% zero. Dodrecht: Springer, 2016, 231–266
10 Anonymous. Mineral commodity summaries. Reston, USA: U.S. Geological Survey, 2019
11 F Killiches, H P Gebauer, G Franken, S Röhling, P Schulz, H W Müller. Phosphate. Hannover, Germany: German Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR), 2013 (in German)
12 T Brandenburg, P Buchholz, U Dorner, D Huy, M Liedtke, M Schmidt, H Sievers, D Homberg-Heumann, K Lang, A Schumacher, B Wehenpohl. DERA natural recource information. Berlin: German Resource Agency (DERA) at the German Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR), 2016 (in German)
13 D Cordell, J O Drangert, S White. The story of phosphorus: global food security and food for thought. Global Environmental Change, 2009, 19(2): 292–305
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.009
14 H Knittel, E Albert, T Ebertseder. Practical handbook fertilizers and fertilization. Bergen/Dumme: Agrimedia GmbH, 2012 (in German)
15 W Zorn, H Schröter, H Heß, S Wagner. Fertilizing energy crop rotations differently. DLG-Communication, 2011 (in German)
16 FAO. Statistical data. Available at FAO website on April 14, 2019
17 Z Yan, P Liu, Y Li, L Ma, A Alva, Z Dou, Q Chen, F Zhang. Phosphorus in China’s intensive vegetable production systems: overfertilization, soil enrichment, and environmental implications. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2013, 42(4): 982–989
https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2012.0463 pmid: 24216350
18 H Li, J Liu, G Li, J Shen, L Bergström, F Zhang. Past, present, and future use of phosphorus in Chinese agriculture and its influence on phosphorus losses. Ambio, 2015, 44(Suppl 2): 274–285
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0633-0 pmid: 25681984
19 G K MacDonald, E M Bennett, P A Potter, N Ramankutty. Agronomic phosphorus imbalances across the world’s croplands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011, 108(7): 3086–3091
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010808108 pmid: 21282605
20 C Ott, H Rechberger. The European phosphorus balance. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2012, 60: 159–172
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.12.007
21 P J A Withers, K C van Dijk, T S S Neset, T Nesme, O Oenema, G H Rubæk, O F Schoumans, B Smit, S Pellerin. Stewardship to tackle global phosphorus inefficiency: the case of Europe. Ambio, 2015, 44(Suppl 2): 193–206
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0614-8 pmid: 25681977
22 S Z Sattari, A F Bouwman, K E Giller, M K van Ittersum. Residual soil phosphorus as the missing piece in the global phosphorus crisis puzzle. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012, 109(16): 6348–6353
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1113675109 pmid: 22431593
23 J Shen, L Yuan, J Zhang, H Li, Z Bai, X Chen, W Zhang, F Zhang. Phosphorus dynamics: from soil to plant. Plant Physiology, 2011, 156(3): 997–1005
https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.175232 pmid: 21571668
24 S A Barber. Soil nutrient bioavailability. A mechanistic approach. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., 1995
25 H Lambers, P M Finnegan, E Laliberté, S J Pearse, M H Ryan, M W Shane, E J Veneklaas. Phosphorus nutrition of Proteaceae in severely ohosphorus-impoverished soils: are there lessons to be learned for future crops? Plant Physiology, 2011, 156(3): 1058–1066
https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.174318 pmid: 21498583
26 P M Nkebiwe, M Weinmann, T Müller. Improving fertilizer-depot exploitation and maize growth by inoculation with plant growth-promoting bacteria—from lab to field. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, 2016: 15
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-016-0065-5
27 P M Nkebiwe, M Weinmann, A Bar-Tal, T Muller. Fertilizer placement to improve crop nutrient acquisition and yield: a review and meta-analysis. Field Crops Research, 2016, 196: 389–401
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.07.018
28 P M Nkebiwe, M Weinmann, T Müller. Densely rooted rhizosphere hotspots induced around subsurface NH4+-fertilizer depots: a home for P-solubilizing PGPMs? Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, 2017: 29
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-017-0111-y
29 J Jing, Y Rui, F Zhang, Z Rengel, J Shen. Localized application of phosphorus and ammonium improves growth of maize seedlings by stimulating root proliferation and rhizosphere acidification. Field Crops Research, 2010, 119(2–3): 355–364
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.08.005
30 J Shen, C Li, G Mi, L Li, L Yuan, R Jiang, F Zhang. Maximizing root/rhizosphere efficiency to improve crop productivity and nutrient use efficiency in intensive agriculture of China. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2013, 64(5): 1181–1192
https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers342 pmid: 23255279
31 T J Rose, L Liu, M Wissuwa. Improving phosphorus efficiency in cereal crops: is breeding for reduced grain phosphorus concentration part of the solution? Frontiers of Plant Science, 2013, 4: 444
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00444 pmid: 24204376
32 M S Calvo, J Uribarri. Public health impact of dietary phosphorus excess on bone and cardiovascular health in the general population. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2013, 98(1): 6–15
https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.112.053934 pmid: 23719553
33 C P Vance, T J Chiou. Phosphorus focus editorial. Plant Physiology, 2011, 156(3): 987–988
https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.900415 pmid: 21724751
34 T Björkman, S Reiners. Application of bicarbonate to high-phosphorus soils to increase plant-available phosphorus. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2014, 78(1): 319–324
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2013.08.0359
35 B U Metzler, R Mosenthin, T Baumgärtel, M Rodehutscord. The effect of dietary phosphorus and calcium level, phytase supplementation, and ileal infusion of pectin on the chemical composition and carbohydrase activity of fecal bacteria and the level of microbial metabolites in the gastrointestinal tract of pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 2008, 86(7): 1544–1555
https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0267 pmid: 18344312
36 P S Pavinato, M Rodrigues, A Soltangheisi, L R Sartor, P J A Withers. Effects of cover crops and phosphorus sources on maize yield, phosphorus uptake, and phosphorus use efficiency. Agronomy Journal, 2017, 109(3): 1039–1047
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2016.06.0323
37 X F Li, C B Wang, W P Zhang, L H Wang, X L Tian, S C Yang, W L Jiang, J Van Ruijven, L Li. The role of complementarity and selection effects in P acquisition of intercropping systems. Plant and Soil, 2018, 422(1–2): 479–493
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3487-3
38 T Müller, R Doluschitz, M Roelcke. Sino-German International Research Training Group “Adaption of maize-based food-feed-energy systems to limited phosphate resources” (GPK 2366). Available at DFG website on August 21, 2019
39 F S Chapin III, E D Schulze, H A Mooney. The ecology and economics of storage in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1990, 21(1): 423–447
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.21.110190.002231
40 C Hermans, J P Hammond, P J White, N Verbruggen. How do plants respond to nutrient shortage by biomass allocation? Trends in Plant Science, 2006, 11(12): 610–617
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2006.10.007 pmid: 17092760
[1] Li XUE, Ertao WANG. Arbuscular mycorrhizal associations and the major regulators[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2020, 7(3): 296-306.
[2] Dongdong LI, Meng WANG, Xianyan KUANG, Wenxin LIU. Genetic study and molecular breeding for high phosphorus use efficiency in maize[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2019, 6(4): 366-379.
[3] Uwe LUDEWIG, Lixing YUAN, Günter NEUMANN. Improving the efficiency and effectiveness of global phosphorus use: focus on root and rhizosphere levels in the agronomic system[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2019, 6(4): 357-365.
[4] Rui WANG, Weiming SHI, Yilin LI. Phosphorus supply and management in vegetable production systems in China[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2019, 6(4): 348-356.
[5] Martin BLACKWELL, Tegan DARCH, Richard HASLAM. Phosphorus use efficiency and fertilizers: future opportunities for improvements[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2019, 6(4): 332-340.
[6] Qing XUE, Xinyue HE, Saskia D. SACHS, Gero C. BECKER, Tao ZHANG, Andrea KRUSE. The current phosphate recycling situation in China and Germany: a comparative review[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2019, 6(4): 403-418.
[7] Qiugang MA, Markus RODEHUTSCORD, Moritz NOVOTNY, Lan LI, Luqing YANG. Phytate and phosphorus utilization by broiler chickens and laying hens fed maize-based diets[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2019, 6(4): 380-387.
[8] Meng DUAN, Jin XIE, Xiaomin MAO. Modeling water and heat transfer in soil-plant-atmosphere continuum applied to maize growth under plastic film mulching[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2019, 6(2): 144-161.
[9] Quanxiao FANG, Liwang MA, Lajpat Rai AHUJA, Thomas James TROUT, Robert Wayne MALONE, Huihui ZHANG, Dongwei GUI, Qiang YU. Long-term simulation of growth stage-based irrigation scheduling in maize under various water constraints in Colorado, USA[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2017, 4(2): 172-184.
[10] Xiaoyi WEI,Weiqiang ZHANG,Qian ZHANG,Pei SUN,Zhaohu LI,Mingcai ZHANG,Jianmin LI,Liusheng DUAN. Analysis of differential expression of genes induced by ethephon in elongating internodes of maize plants[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2016, 3(3): 263-282.
[11] Xiaoxin YE,Jinnan JIA,Yongqing MA,Yu AN,Shuqi DONG. Effectiveness of ten commercial maize cultivars in inducing Egyptian broomrape germination[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2016, 3(2): 137-146.
[12] Hui RAN,Shaozhong KANG,Fusheng LI,Ling TONG,Taisheng DU. Effects of irrigation and nitrogen management on hybrid maize seed production in north-west China[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2016, 3(1): 55-64.
[13] Jingjing WANG,Feng HUANG,Baoguo LI. Quantitative analysis of yield and soil water balance for summer maize on the piedmont of the North China Plain using AquaCrop[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2015, 2(4): 295-310.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed