Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-0179

ISSN 2095-0187(Online)

CN 11-5981/TQ

Postal Subscription Code 80-969

2018 Impact Factor: 2.809

Front. Chem. Sci. Eng.    2017, Vol. 11 Issue (1) : 66-71    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-016-1591-1
REVIEW ARTICLE
Cofactor engineering in cyanobacteria to overcome imbalance between NADPH and NADH: A mini review
Jongmoon Park1,2,3,Yunnam Choi1()
1. Department of Chemical Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Gyeongbuk 790-784, Korea
2. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Gyeongbuk 790-784, Korea
3. Division of Advanced Nuclear Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Gyeongbuk 790-784, Korea
 Download: PDF(141 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Cyanobacteria can produce useful renewable fuels and high-value chemicals using sunlight and atmospheric carbon dioxide by photosynthesis. Genetic manipulation has increased the variety of chemicals that cyanobacteria can produce. However, their uniquely abundant NADPH-pool, in other words insufficient supply of NADH, tends to limit their production yields in case of utilizing NADH-dependent enzyme, which is quite common in heterotrophic microbes. To overcome this cofactor imbalance and enhance cyanobacterial fuel and chemical production, various approaches for cofactor engineering have been employed. In this review, we focus on three approaches: (1) utilization of NADPH-dependent enzymes, (2) increasing NADH production, and (3) changing cofactor specificity of NADH-dependent enzymes from NADH to NADPH.

Keywords NADH-dependent enzyme      NADPH-dependent enzyme      transhydrogenase      site-directed mutagenesis      enzyme engineering     
Corresponding Author(s): Yunnam Choi   
Just Accepted Date: 19 August 2016   Online First Date: 18 September 2016    Issue Date: 17 March 2017
 Cite this article:   
Jongmoon Park,Yunnam Choi. Cofactor engineering in cyanobacteria to overcome imbalance between NADPH and NADH: A mini review[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(1): 66-71.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/10.1007/s11705-016-1591-1
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/Y2017/V11/I1/66
Co-factor engineering Used enzyme/engineering strategy Product Host strains Reference
Utilizing NADPH-dependent enzyme Yqhda) isobutanol S. elongatus 7942 [11]
Yqhda), PhaBb), Bldhc) 1-butanol S. elongatus 7942 [10]
Yqhda) 1,3-propanediol S. elongatus 7942 [25]
Yqhda) and NADPH-dependent sADHd) 1,2-propanediol S. elongatus 7942 [26]
Yqhda) and zwf overexprssion Ethanol Synechocystis sp. [7]
slr1192 Synechocystis sp. [6]
NADPH-dependent sADHd) 2,3-butanediol S. elongatus 7942 [27]
NADPH-dependent acetoin reductase Synechocystis sp. [28]
Increasing NADH production Co-expression of transhydrogenase L-lactate Synechocystis sp. [12]
D-lactate S. elongatus 7942 [29]
Synechocystis sp. [13]
2,3-butanediol Synechocystis sp. [28]
Deletion of NADH-consuming pathway Hydrogen S. elongatus 7002 [30]
Activation of NAD(P)H generating pathway S. elongatus 7002 [31]
Changing cofactor specificity of enzyme Site-directed mutagenesis L-lactate Synechocystis sp. [15]
D-lactate S. elongatus 7942 [16]
Tab.1  Co-factor engineering in cyanobacteria to increase biofuel/chemical production
Fig.1  Schematic representation of cofactor engineering in cyanobacteria
1 Parmar A, Singh N K, Pandey A, Gnansounou E, Madamwar D. Cyanobacteria and microalgae: A positive prospect for biofuels. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(22): 10163–10172
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.030
2 Machado I M, Atsumi S. Cyanobacterial biofuel production. Journal of Biotechnology, 2012, 162(1): 50–56
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.03.005
3 Nozzi N E, Oliver J W, Atsumi S. Cyanobacteria as a platform for biofuel production. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2013, 1: 1–6
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2013.00007
4 Deng M D, Coleman J R. Ethanol synthesis by genetic engineering in cyanobacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1999, 65(2): 523–528
5 Dexter J, Fu P. Metabolic engineering of cyanobacteria for ethanol production. Energy & Environmental Science, 2009, 2(8): 857–864
https://doi.org/10.1039/b811937f
6 Gao Z, Zhao H, Li Z, Tan X, Lu X. Photosynthetic production of ethanol from carbon dioxide in genetically engineered cyanobacteria. Energy & Environmental Science, 2012, 5(12): 9857–9865
https://doi.org/10.1039/C2EE22675H
7 Choi Y N, Park J M. Enhancing biomass and ethanol production by increasing NADPH production in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 213: 54–57
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.056
8 Kusakabe T, Tatsuke T, Tsuruno K, Hirokawa Y, Atsumi S, Liao J C, Hanai T. Engineering a synthetic pathway in cyanobacteria for isopropanol production directly from carbon dioxide and light. Metabolic Engineering, 2013, 20: 101–108
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2013.09.007
9 Lan E I, Liao J C. Metabolic engineering of cyanobacteria for 1-butanol production from carbon dioxide. Metabolic Engineering, 2011, 13(4): 353–363
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2011.04.004
10 Lan E I, Liao J C. ATP drives direct photosynthetic production of 1-butanol in cyanobacteria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012, 109(16): 6018–6023
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200074109
11 Atsumi S, Higashide W, Liao J C. Direct photosynthetic recycling of carbon dioxide to isobutyraldehyde. Nature Biotechnology, 2009, 27(12): 1177–1180
https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1586
12 Angermayr S A, Paszota M, Hellingwerf K J. Engineering a cyanobacterial cell factory for production of lactic acid. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2012, 78(19): 7098–7106
https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01587-12
13 Varman A M, Yu Y, You L, Tang Y J. Photoautotrophic production of D-lactic acid in an engineered cyanobacterium. Microbial Cell Factories, 2013, 12(1): 1–8
https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-12-117
14 Zhou J, Zhang H, Meng H, Zhang Y, Li Y. Production of optically pure D-lactate from CO2 by blocking the PHB and acetate pathways and expressing D-lactate dehydrogenase in cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Process Biochemistry, 2014, 49(12): 2071–2077
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2014.09.007
15 Angermayr S A, Van der Woude A D, Correddu D, Vreugdenhil A, Verrone V, Hellingwerf K J. Exploring metabolic engineering design principles for the photosynthetic production of lactic acid by Synechocystis sp. PCC6803. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2014, 7(1): 1–15
https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-7-99
16 Li C, Tao F, Ni J, Wang Y, Yao F, Xu P. Enhancing the light-driven production of D-lactate by engineering cyanobacterium using a combinational strategy. Scientific Reports, 2015, 5: 1–11
17 Miyake M, Takase K, Narato M, Khatipov E, Schnackenberg J, Shirai M, Kurane R, Asada Y. Polyhydroxybutyrate production from carbon dioxide by cyanobacteria. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2000, 84-86(1-9): 991–1002
https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:84-86:1-9:991
18 Tyo K E, Jin Y S, Espinoza F A, Stephanopoulos G. Identification of gene disruptions for increased poly-3-hydroxybutyrate accumulation in Synechocystis PCC 6803. Biotechnology Progress, 2009, 25(5): 1236–1243
https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.228
19 Zhou J, Zhu T, Cai Z, Li Y. From cyanochemicals to cyanofactories: A review and perspective. Microbial Cell Factories, 2016, 15(1): 1–9
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-015-0405-3
20 Wang Y, San K Y, Bennett G N. Cofactor engineering for advancing chemical biotechnology. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2013, 24(6): 994–999, 99
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2013.03.022
21 Akhtar M K, Jones P R. Cofactor Engineering for enhancing the flux of metabolic pathways. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2014, 2: 1–6
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2014.00030
22 Tamoi M, Miyazaki T, Fukamizo T, Shigeoka S. The calvin cycle in cyanobacteria is regulated by CP12 via the NAD(H)/NADP(H) ratio under light/dark conditions. Plant Journal, 2005, 42(4): 504–513
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02391.x
23 Cooley J W, Vermaas W F. Succinate dehydrogenase and other respiratory pathways in thylakoid membranes of Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803: Capacity comparisons and physiological function. Journal of Bacteriology, 2001, 183(14): 4251–4258
https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.183.14.4251-4258.2001
24 Dempo Y, Ohta E, Nakayama Y, Bamba T, Fukusaki E. Molar-based targeted metabolic profiling of cyanobacterial strains with potential for biological production. Metabolites, 2014, 4(2): 499–516
https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo4020499
25 Hirokawa Y, Maki Y, Tatsuke T, Hanai T. Cyanobacterial production of 1,3-propanediol directly from carbon dioxide using a synthetic metabolic pathway. Metabolic Engineering, 2016, 34: 97–103
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2015.12.008
26 Li H, Liao J C. Engineering a cyanobacterium as the catalyst for the photosynthetic conversion of CO2 to 1,2-propanediol. Microbial Cell Factories, 2013, 12(1): 1–9
https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-12-4
27 Oliver J W, Machado I M, Yoneda H, Atsumi S. Cyanobacterial conversion of carbon dioxide to 2,3-butanediol. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013, 110(4): 1249–1254
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213024110
28 Savakis P E, Angermayr S A, Hellingwerf K J. Synthesis of 2,3-butanediol by Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 via heterologous expression of a catabolic pathway from lactic acid-and enterobacteria. Metabolic Engineering, 2013, 20: 121–130
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2013.09.008
29 Niederholtmeyer H, Wolfstadter B T, Savage D F, Silver P A, Way J C. Engineering cyanobacteria to synthesize and export hydrophilic products. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2010, 76(11): 3462–3466
https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00202-10
30 McNeely K, Xu Y, Bennette N, Bryant D A, Dismukes G C. Redirecting reductant flux into hydrogen production via metabolic engineering of fermentative carbon metabolism in a cyanobacterium. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2010, 76(15): 5032–5038
https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00862-10
31 Kumaraswamy G K, Guerra T, Qian X, Zhang S, Bryant D A, Dismukes G C. Reprogramming the glycolytic pathway for increased hydrogen production in cyanobacteria: Metabolic engineering of NAD+-dependent GAPDH. Energy & Environmental Science, 2013, 6(12): 3722–3731
https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ee42206b
32 Jarboe L R, Yqh D. A broad-substrate range aldehyde reductase with various applications in production of biorenewable fuels and chemicals. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2011, 89(2): 249–257
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2912-9
33 Wee Y J, Kim J N, Ryu H W. Biotechnological production of lactic acid and its recent applications. Food Technology and Biotechnology, 2006, 44(2): 163–172
34 Joseph A, Aikawa S, Sasaki K, Tsuge Y, Matsuda F, Tanaka T, Kondo A. Utilization of lactic acid bacterial genes in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 in the production of lactic acid. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, 2013, 77(5): 966–970
https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.120921
35 Polizzi K M, Chaparro-Riggers J F, Vazquez-Figueroa E, Bommarius A S. Structure-guided consensus approach to create a more thermostable penicillin G acylase. Biotechnology Journal, 2006, 1(5): 531–536
https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.200600029
36 Terao Y, Miyamoto K, Ohta H. Introduction of single mutation changes arylmalonate decarboxylase to racemase. Chemical Communications, 2006, 34(34): 3600–3602
https://doi.org/10.1039/b607211a
37 Vázquez-Figueroa E, Chaparro-Riggers J, Bommarius A S. Development of a thermostable glucose dehydrogenase by a structure-guided consensus concept. ChemBioChem, 2007, 8(18): 2295–2301
https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.200700500
38 Jochens H, Bornscheuer U T. Natural diversity to guide focused directed evolution. ChemBioChem, 2010, 11(13): 1861–1866
https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.201000284
39 Ema T, Nakano Y, Yoshida D, Kamata S, Sakai T. Redesign of enzyme for improving catalytic activity and enantioselectivity toward poor substrates: Manipulation of the transition state. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry, 2012, 10(31): 6299–6308
https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ob25614b
40 Holmberg N, Ryde U, Bulow L. Redesign of the coenzyme specificity in L-lactate dehydrogenase from bacillus stearothermophilus using site-directed mutagenesis and media engineering. Protein Engineering, Design & Selection, 1999, 12(10): 851–856
https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/12.10.851
41 Ma C, Zhang L, Dai J, Xiu Z. Relaxing the coenzyme specificity of 1,3-propanediol oxidoreductase from Klebsiella pneumoniae by rational design. Journal of Biotechnology, 2010, 146(4): 173–178
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.02.005
42 Richter N, Zienert A, Hummel W. A single-point mutation enables lactate dehydrogenase from Bacillus subtilis to utilize NAD+ and NADP+ as cofactor. Engineering in Life Sciences, 2011, 11(1): 26–36
https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201000151
43 Meng H, Liu P, Sun H, Cai Z, Zhou J, Lin J, Li Y. Engineering a D-lactate dehydrogenase that can super-efficiently utilize NADPH and NADH as cofactors. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 1–8
44 Steiner K, Schwab H. Recent advances in rational approaches for enzyme engineering. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 2012, 2(3): 1–12
https://doi.org/10.5936/csbj.201209010
45 Li Y, Cirino P C. Recent advances in engineering proteins for biocatalysis. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2014, 111(7): 1273–1287
https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.25240
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed