|
|
Thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes with substrate layer composed of polysulfone blended with PEG or polysulfone grafted PEG methyl ether methacrylate |
Baicang Liu1,2(),Chen Chen3,Pingju Zhao1,2,Tong Li4,Caihong Liu5,Qingyuan Wang1,2,Yongsheng Chen6,John Crittenden6 |
1. College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China 2. Institute of New Energy and Low Carbon Technology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610207, China 3. Litree Purifying Technology Co., Ltd, Haikou 571126, China 4. Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China 5. State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China 6. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA |
|
|
Abstract To advance commercial application of forward osmosis (FO), we investigated the effects of two additives on the performance of polysulfone (PSf) based FO membranes: one is poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), and another is PSf grafted with PEG methyl ether methacrylate (PSf-g-PEGMA). PSf blended with PEG or PSf-g-PEGMA was used to form a substrate layer, and then polyamide was formed on a support layer by interfacial polymerization. In this study, NaCl (1 mol?L−1) and deionized water were used as the draw solution and the feed solution, respectively. With the increase of PEG content from 0 to 15 wt-%, FO water flux declined by 23.4% to 59.3% compared to a PSf TFC FO membrane. With the increase of PSf-g-PEGMA from 0 to 15 wt-%, the membrane flux showed almost no change at first and then declined by about 52.0% and 50.4%. The PSf with 5 wt-% PSf-g-PEGMA FO membrane showed a higher pure water flux of 8.74 L?m−2?h−1 than the commercial HTI membranes (6–8 L?m−2?h−1) under the FO mode. Our study suggests that hydrophobic interface is very important for the formation of polyamide, and a small amount of PSf-g-PEGMA can maintain a good condition for the formation of polyamide and reduce internal concentration polarization.
|
Keywords
thin-film composite
forward osmosis
amphiphilic copolymer
interfacial polymerization
poly(ethylene glycol)
|
Corresponding Author(s):
Baicang Liu
|
Just Accepted Date: 26 August 2016
Online First Date: 13 September 2016
Issue Date: 29 November 2016
|
|
1 |
Cath T Y, Childress A E, Elimelech M. Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 281(1-2): 70–87
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.05.048
|
2 |
Lee S, Boo C, Elimelech M, Hong S. Comparison of fouling behavior in forward osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO). Journal of Membrane Science, 2010, 365(1-2): 34–39
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.08.036
|
3 |
Mi B, Elimelech M. Organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes: Fouling reversibility and cleaning without chemical reagents. Journal of Membrane Science, 2010, 348(1-2): 337–345
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.11.021
|
4 |
Mi B, Elimelech M. Gypsum scaling and cleaning in forward osmosis: Measurements and mechanisms. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44(6): 2022–2028
https://doi.org/10.1021/es903623r
|
5 |
Mi B, Elimelech M. Silica scaling and scaling reversibility in forward osmosis. Desalination, 2013, 312: 75–81
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.08.034
|
6 |
Shaffer D L, Yip N Y, Gilron J, Elimelech M. Seawater desalination for agriculture by integrated forward and reverse osmosis: Improved product water quality for potentially less energy. Journal of Membrane Science, 2012, 415: 1–8
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.05.016
|
7 |
Su J, Chung T S, Helmer B J, de Wit J S. Enhanced double-skinned FO membranes with inner dense layer for wastewater treatment and macromolecule recycle using sucrose as draw solute. Journal of Membrane Science, 2012, 396: 92–100
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.01.001
|
8 |
Ge Q, Wang P, Wan C, Chung T S. Polyelectrolyte-promoted forward osmosis-membrane distillation (FO-MD) hybrid process for dye wastewater treatment. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(11): 6236–6243
https://doi.org/10.1021/es300784h
|
9 |
Petrotos K B, Quantick P, Petropakis H. A study of the direct osmotic concentration of tomato juice in tubular membrane-module configuration. I. The effect of certain basic process parameters on the process performance. Journal of Membrane Science, 1998, 150(1): 99–110
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(98)00216-6
|
10 |
Nayak C A, Rastogi N K. Forward osmosis for the concentration of anthocyanin from Garcinia indica Choisy. Separation and Purification Technology, 2010, 71(2): 144–151
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2009.11.013
|
11 |
She Q, Jin X, Tang C Y. Osmotic power production from salinity gradient resource by pressure retarded osmosis: Effects of operating conditions and reverse solute diffusion. Journal of Membrane Science, 2012, 401: 262–273
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.02.014
|
12 |
Chou S, Wang R, Shi L, She Q, Tang C, Fane A G. Thin-film composite hollow fiber membranes for pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) process with high power density. Journal of Membrane Science, 2012, 389: 25–33
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.10.002
|
13 |
Yip N Y, Tiraferri A, Phillip W A, Schiffrnan J D, Hoover L A, Kim Y C, Elimelech M. Thin-film composite pressure retarded osmosis membranes for sustainable power generation from salinity gradients. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(10): 4360–4369
https://doi.org/10.1021/es104325z
|
14 |
Yip N Y, Elimelech M. Performance limiting effects in power generation from salinity gradients by pressure retarded osmosis. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(23): 10273–10282
https://doi.org/10.1021/es203197e
|
15 |
Abdallah H, El-Gendi A, Khedr M, El-Zanati E. Hydrophobic polyethersulfone porous membranes for membrane distillation. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2015, 9(1): 84–93
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-015-1508-4
|
16 |
Xie M, Nghiem L D, Price W E, Elimelech M. A forward osmosis-membrane distillation hybrid process for direct sewer mining: System performance and limitations. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(23): 13486–13493
https://doi.org/10.1021/es404056e
|
17 |
Phuntsho S, Shon H K, Hong S, Lee S, Vigneswaran S. A novel low energy fertilizer driven forward osmosis desalination for direct fertigation: Evaluating the performance of fertilizer draw solutions. Journal of Membrane Science, 2011, 375(1-2): 172–181
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.03.038
|
18 |
Phuntsho S, Shon H K, Majeed T, El Saliby I, Vigneswaran S, Kandasamy J, Hong S, Lee S. Blended fertilizers as draw solutions for fertilizer-drawn forward osmosis desalination. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(8): 4567–4575
https://doi.org/10.1021/es300002w
|
19 |
Sukitpaneenit P, Chung T S. High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes with macrovoid-free and highly porous structure for sustainable water production. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(13): 7358–7365
https://doi.org/10.1021/es301559z
|
20 |
Wang R, Shi L, Tang C Y, Chou S, Qiu C, Fane A G. Characterization of novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2010, 355(1-2): 158–167
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.03.017
|
21 |
Zhao S, Zou L, Tang C Y, Mulcahy D. Recent developments in forward osmosis: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Membrane Science, 2012, 396: 1–21
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.023
|
22 |
Tiraferri A, Yip N Y, Phillip W A, Schiffman J D, Elimelech M. Relating performance of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes to support layer formation and structure. Journal of Membrane Science, 2011, 367(1-2): 340–352
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.11.014
|
23 |
McCutcheon J R, Elimelech M. Influence of membrane support layer hydrophobicity on water flux in osmotically driven membrane processes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2008, 318(1-2): 458–466
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.03.021
|
24 |
Ghosh A K, Hoek E M V. Impacts of support membrane structure and chemistry on polyamide-polysulfone interfacial composite membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2009, 336(1-2): 140–148
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.03.024
|
25 |
Widjojo N, Chung T S, Weber M, Maletzko C, Warzelhan V. The role of sulphonated polymer and macrovoid-free structure in the support layer for thin-film composite (TFC) forward osmosis (FO) membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2011, 383(1-2): 214–223
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.08.041
|
26 |
Zhong P, Fu X, Chung T S, Weber M, Maletzko C. Development of thin-film composite forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes using direct sulfonated polyphenylenesulfone (sPPSU) as membrane substrates. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(13): 7430–7436
|
27 |
Chakrabarty B, Ghoshal A K, Purkait M K. Effect of molecular weight of PEG on membrane morphology and transport properties. Journal of Membrane Science, 2008, 309(1-2): 209–221
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2007.10.027
|
28 |
Liu B, Chen C, Li T, Crittenden J, Chen Y. High performance ultrafiltration membrane composed of PVDF blended with its derivative copolymer PVDF-g-PEGMA. Journal of Membrane Science, 2013, 445: 66–75
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.05.043
|
29 |
Nhu-Ngoc B, McCutcheon J R. Hydrophilic nanofibers as new supports for thin film composite membranes for engineered osmosis. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(3): 1761–1769
|
30 |
Park J Y, Acar M H, Akthakul A, Kuhlman W, Mayes A M. Polysulfone-graft-poly(ethylene glycol) graft copolymers for surface modification of polysulfone membranes. Biomaterials, 2006, 27(6): 856–865
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.010
|
31 |
Ghosh A K, Jeong B H, Huang X, Hoek E M V. Impacts of reaction and curing conditions on polyamide composite reverse osmosis membrane properties. Journal of Membrane Science, 2008, 311(1-2): 34–45
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2007.11.038
|
32 |
Cadotte J E. Interfacially synthesized reverse osmosis membrane. US Patent, 4277344, 1981
|
33 |
Yip N Y, Tiraferri A, Phillip W A, Schiffman J D, Elimelech M. High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44(10): 3812–3818
https://doi.org/10.1021/es1002555
|
34 |
Phillip W A, Yong J S, Elimelech M. Reverse draw solute permeation in forward osmosis: Modeling and experiments. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44(13): 5170–5176
https://doi.org/10.1021/es100901n
|
35 |
Cath T Y, Elimelech M, McCutcheon J R, McGinnis R L, Achilli A, Anastasio D, Brady A R, Childress A E, Farr I V, Hancock N T, Lampi J, Nghiem L D, Xie M, Yip N Y. Standard methodology for evaluating membrane performance in osmotically driven membrane processes. Desalination, 2013, 312: 31–38
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.07.005
|
36 |
Boom R M, Wienk I M, Vandenboomgaard T, Smolders C A. Microstructures in phase inversion membranes. 2. The role of a polymeric additive. Journal of Membrane Science, 1992, 73(2-3): 277–292
https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(92)80135-7
|
37 |
Liu B, Chen C, Zhang W, Crittenden J, Chen Y. Low-cost antifouling PVC ultrafiltration membrane fabrication with Pluronic F 127: Effect of additives on properties and performance. Desalination, 2012, 307: 26–33
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.07.036
|
38 |
Wei J, Qiu C, Tang C Y, Wang R, Fane A G. Synthesis and characterization of flat-sheet thin film composite forward osmosis membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2011, 372(1-2): 292–302
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.02.013
|
39 |
Huang L, McCutcheon J R. Impact of support layer pore size on performance of thin film composite membranes for forward osmosis. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 483: 25–33
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.01.025
|
40 |
Mi Y F, Zhao Q, Ji Y L, An Q F, Gao C J. A novel route for surface zwitterionic functionalization of polyamide nanofiltration membranes with improved performance. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 490: 311–320
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.04.072
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|