Labor Mobility, Marketization and Urban Income Change: Potential Rural-Urban Harmonization or Not
Labor Mobility, Marketization and Urban Income Change: Potential Rural-Urban Harmonization or Not
Kunrong Shen1(), Jixiang Yu2(), Jian Li3()
1. School of Economics, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China; 2. Economy and Trade Department, Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang 233100, China; 3. School of Economics, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
Previous literature omitted marketization process, a distinct phenomenon in transitional China, when the relationship between immigrants and indigenous urban income is investigated. We find that (1) marketization is a key factor of rural-urban harmonization; (2) segmentation of labor market has no real effect on urban income change since it may be evaded partly by rural labor; (3) the key determinants of urban income change are the cross effect between marketization and mobility, openness, and government spending; and (4) the marginal effect of immigrants is positive in some regions although it is averagely negative during the sample period. Rural-urban harmonization is totally possible if marketization process continues.
. Labor Mobility, Marketization and Urban Income Change: Potential Rural-Urban Harmonization or Not[J]. Frontiers of Economics in China, 2011, 6(3): 447-463.
Kunrong Shen, Jixiang Yu, Jian Li. Labor Mobility, Marketization and Urban Income Change: Potential Rural-Urban Harmonization or Not. Front Econ Chin, 2011, 6(3): 447-463.
