Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Economics in China

ISSN 1673-3444

ISSN 1673-3568(Online)

CN 11-5744/F

Postal Subscription Code 80-978

Front. Econ. China    2009, Vol. 4 Issue (3) : 384-405
Research articles |
Financial constraints, agency cost and firm’s investment behavior: Evidence from listed companies of China
 Download: PDF(314 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract Financial constraints due to the imperfection of capital market have been emphasized as an important factors determining investment by researchers recently. Beside of which, the soft budget constraints (SBC) and agency problem caused by dual property structure of enterprise system are even more important for investment in transitional China. Combing the background of aggregate investment, this paper analyzes the investment behavior and its inner mechanism of listed company in China from different views of SBC, agency cost theory and financial constraints. Based on the empirical study of 1 373 listed company, we find there is indeed some differences for SOE and non-SOE in the aspect of financial constraints even the hypothesis on nexus of cash flow and investment fails. Evidence has been found to support that principal-agency problem in the background of SBC and financial constraints can explain the investment behavior of listed company jointly, which provides another way to interpret the investment behavior of listed company in transitional country.
Keywords investment behavior      financial constraints      heterogeneity      panel data      
Issue Date: 05 September 2009
 Cite this article:   
. Financial constraints, agency cost and firm’s investment behavior: Evidence from listed companies of China[J]. Front. Econ. China,2009, 4(3): 384-405.
[1] Yu Chen, Haiwen Zhou. An Overlapping-Generations Model of Firm Heterogeneity in Economic Development[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2017, 12(4): 660-676.
[2] Junhui Hu,Yongchong Mao,Jinghua Zhang. The Impact of Non-Labor Income Given Job Heterogeneity on Household Time Allocation: The Evidence from China[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2015, 10(1): 113-136.
[3] Hao Chen,Jianwei Chen. The Gender-Biased Employment Effect of Exports: Evidence from China[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2014, 9(2): 261-284.
[4] Kunyuan Qiao. Consumption Inequality in China: Theory and Evidence from the China Health and Nutrition Survey[J]. Front Econ Chin, 2013, 8(1): 91-112.
[5] Qing Liu, Larry D. Qiu. Cross-Country Externalities of Trade and FDI Liberalization[J]. Front Econ Chin, 2013, 8(1): 19-49.
[6] Chunrong Ai, Qiong Zhou. Estimation of Censored Regression Model: A Simulation Study[J]. Front Econ Chin, 2012, 7(4): 499-518.
[7] Kevin X. D. Huang, Frank Caliendo. Rationalizing Multiple Consumption-Saving Puzzles in a Unified Framework[J]. Front Econ Chin, 2011, 6(3): 359-388.
[8] Feng Lou, Xuesong Li. An Empirical Analysis of Income Disparity and Consumption in China[J]. Front Econ Chin, 2011, 6(1): 157-170.
[9] Huayi Yu , . China’s House Price: Affected by Economic Fundamentals or Real Estate Policy?[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2010, 5(1): 25-51.
[10] LI Pei. Metropolitan economic growth and spatial dependence: Evidence from a panel of China[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2008, 3(2): 277-295.
[11] BAO Qun, YANG Jiayu. Does fi nancial development promote international trade? —Evidence from China[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2007, 2(4): 532-557.
[12] PI Jiancai. Fairness compatibility constraints and collective actions[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2007, 2(4): 644-652.
[13] YING Weiwei. Does macro-economy have any effect on firm investment-cash flow sensitivities? —An empirical study based on panel data, 1993–2004[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2007, 2(3): 388-403.
[14] CHEN Zhao, LU Ming, YAN Ji. Reform, Interaction of Policies, and Economic Growth: Evidence from China’s Provincial Panel Data[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2006, 1(1): 48-68.
Full text