Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Economics in China

ISSN 1673-3444

ISSN 1673-3568(Online)

CN 11-5744/F

Postal Subscription Code 80-978

Front Econ Chin    2011, Vol. 6 Issue (3) : 359-388    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11459-011-0138-0
research-article |
Rationalizing Multiple Consumption-Saving Puzzles in a Unified Framework
Kevin X. D. Huang1(), Frank Caliendo2
1. Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA; 2. Department of Economics, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA
 Download: PDF(739 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Empirical evidence suggests that it may cost time, effort, and resources to implement an optimal consumption-saving plan, although the cost may differ across individuals. This paper explores the implications of such friction. We begin by documenting a series of facts on consumption and savings over the life cycle, each of which goes against the prediction of the standard life-cycle model. While the existing studies demonstrate how various permutations of the benchmark model may help resolve one or another of these puzzles, it appears difficult to jointly rationalize even a small subset of these facts within the existing theories. We then incorporate a feature of costly implementation into the benchmark model and show that the addition of this one feature moves in the right direction in jointly resolving all these puzzles. This friction is the sole and common mechanism in our model for rationalizing this series of facts, as we intentionally abstract from the mechanisms explored in the existing literature that are known to help explain one or another of these facts, in order to isolate the role of costly implementation. The implementation costs in the model are small, yet our results show that the mechanism can be important in complementing the existing theories to help account for these consumption and saving facts in a unified framework.

Keywords implementation cost      heterogeneity      consumption      saving      life cycle     
Corresponding Authors: Kevin X. D. Huang,Email:kevin.huang@vanderbilt.edu   
Issue Date: 05 September 2011
 Cite this article:   
Kevin X. D. Huang,Frank Caliendo. Rationalizing Multiple Consumption-Saving Puzzles in a Unified Framework[J]. Front Econ Chin, 2011, 6(3): 359-388.
 URL:  
http://academic.hep.com.cn/fec/EN/10.1007/s11459-011-0138-0
http://academic.hep.com.cn/fec/EN/Y2011/V6/I3/359
[1] Yu Chen, Haiwen Zhou. An Overlapping-Generations Model of Firm Heterogeneity in Economic Development[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2017, 12(4): 660-676.
[2] Qin Zhou, Kisalaya Basu, Yan Yuan. Does Health Insurance Coverage Influence Household Financial Portfolios? A Case Study in Urban China[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2017, 12(1): 94-112.
[3] Shang-Jin Wei,Xiaobo Zhang. The Competitive Saving Motive: Concept, Evidence, and Implications[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2016, 11(3): 355-366.
[4] Ming-Jen Chang,Ping Wang,Danyang Xie. The Dynamic Process of Economic Takeoff and Industrial Transformation[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2016, 11(1): 60-87.
[5] Peiguan Wu,Xiaoye Li,Xue Wang. Understanding the Motivation of College Students to Volunteer: An Integrated Consumption/Investment Analysis[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2015, 10(4): 691-721.
[6] Junhui Hu,Yongchong Mao,Jinghua Zhang. The Impact of Non-Labor Income Given Job Heterogeneity on Household Time Allocation: The Evidence from China[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2015, 10(1): 113-136.
[7] Xiaoli He,Hongwu Wang,Haoran Pan. Energy Consumption, Economic Development and Temperature in China: Evidence from PSTR Model[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2014, 9(4): 695-712.
[8] Hao Chen,Jianwei Chen. The Gender-Biased Employment Effect of Exports: Evidence from China[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2014, 9(2): 261-284.
[9] Kunyuan Qiao. Consumption Inequality in China: Theory and Evidence from the China Health and Nutrition Survey[J]. Front Econ Chin, 2013, 8(1): 91-112.
[10] Darong Dai, Kunrong Shen, Ruihua Ma. A Case Against Zero Capital-Income Taxation[J]. Front Econ Chin, 2013, 8(1): 64-90.
[11] Qing Liu, Larry D. Qiu. Cross-Country Externalities of Trade and FDI Liberalization[J]. Front Econ Chin, 2013, 8(1): 19-49.
[12] Feng Lou, Xuesong Li. An Empirical Analysis of Income Disparity and Consumption in China[J]. Front Econ Chin, 2011, 6(1): 157-170.
[13] Xuanhua Xu, Bin Pan. Capital Liquidity and Residents’ Consumption Decision: An Asymmetry Analysis of Economic Prosperity[J]. Front Econ Chin, 2010, 5(4): 622-639.
[14] Yue Li. Analysis on the Disparity in Economic Growth and Consumption between Urban Sector and Rural Sector of China: 1978–2008[J]. Front Econ Chin, 2010, 5(4): 559-581.
[15] FANG Fuqian, . An inquiry into the causes of inadequate household consumption in China—An analysis based on provincial data of urban and rural China[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2009, 4(4): 526-547.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed