Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Economics in China

ISSN 1673-3444

ISSN 1673-3568(Online)

CN 11-5744/F

Postal Subscription Code 80-978

Front Econ Chin    2012, Vol. 7 Issue (4) : 560-579    https://doi.org/10.3868/s060-001-012-0026-8
research-article |
The Potential Impact of Sino-Korean Bilateral Trade on Economic Growth and the Environment: A CGE Model Analysis
Zhuoshun Xu1(), Leshun Xu2()
1. Institute of Soft Science, Jilin Provincial Academy of Social Sciences, Changchun 130033, China; Department of Economics, Korea University, Soul 136-701, Korea; 2. Department of Applied Mathematics, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
 Download: PDF(268 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

A consensus is still to be reached regarding the relationship between trade, growth, and the environment in either the existing theoretical models or previous empirical analyses. By using a Sino-Korean case study, we expect this work to contribute to the theoretical and empirical knowledge of the relationship between trade, growth and the environment. In this paper, four types of simulation are executed by applying a Sino-Korea CGE model. The results reveal that an increasing volume of bilateral trade boosts the real GDP at a decreasing rate. Different degrees in the volume of increase of bilateral trade produce welfare gains for Chinese households, i.e. more household spending. Welfare increases at a decreasing rate when the degree of bilateral trade growth increases less stringently, while in Korea there are welfare losses (less household consumption) when the bilateral trade target becomes increasingly stringent. Moreover, the investment gains in the economy tend to rise more sharply as the degree of bilateral trade growth increases less stringently in China. The investment tends to decrease at a proportional rate when the target bilateral trade volume becomes more stringent and the changes in the gross investment become more significant in Korea. In addition, the aggregate production shows a tendency to increase at a proportional rate with a more stringent target bilateral trade volume and when there are considerable changes in gross production. Furthermore, the impact of most production sectors can benefit China, but have a negative impact on Korea. Meantime, the simulations highlight that import growth increases carbon emissions at a decreasing rate, and export growth increases carbon emissions. According to our policy findings, policy makers should be advised to consider the third trade policy (Scenario c), which maintains a reasonable economic growth but at the expense of investment and welfare.

Keywords Sino-Korean trade      economic growth      environment      CGE model     
Corresponding Authors: Zhuoshun Xu,Email:xuzhuoshun@hotmail.com; Leshun Xu,Email:lsxmail@gmail.com   
Issue Date: 05 December 2012
 Cite this article:   
Zhuoshun Xu,Leshun Xu. The Potential Impact of Sino-Korean Bilateral Trade on Economic Growth and the Environment: A CGE Model Analysis[J]. Front Econ Chin, 2012, 7(4): 560-579.
 URL:  
http://academic.hep.com.cn/fec/EN/10.3868/s060-001-012-0026-8
http://academic.hep.com.cn/fec/EN/Y2012/V7/I4/560
[1] Jiwei Lou. The Possibility and Approaches to an Upper Middle Growth Rate[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2016, 11(2): 196-209.
[2] Robert Barro. China’s Growth Prospects[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2016, 11(2): 192-195.
[3] Ming Lei,Zihan Yin. An Analysis of Energy and Environment Efficiency of China’s Iron and Steel Industry[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2016, 11(1): 123-141.
[4] Qi Sun,Tiao Li,Fang Wu. Enforcement of Capacity-Differentiated Regulations in China: Evidence from Coal-Fired Power Plants[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2015, 10(4): 604-628.
[5] Pak Hung Mo. Democracy and Economic Growth: Optimal Level and Transmission Channels[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2015, 10(1): 85-112.
[6] Derong Zhang. The Mechanism of the Middle Income Trap and the Potential Factors Influencing China’s Economic Growth[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2014, 9(3): 499-528.
[7] Ding Lu. How Green is China’s Path of Catching Up? An International Comparative Evaluation[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2014, 9(3): 484-498.
[8] Yanrui Wu. Productivity, Economic Growth and the Middle Income Trap: Implications for China[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2014, 9(3): 460-483.
[9] Jingwen Yu, Chunchao Wang. What Role Does the Political Environment Play in Economic Development? —A Case Study of Fujian Province[J]. Front Econ Chin, 2012, 7(4): 544-559.
[10] Hongchun Zhao. An Accounting Method for Economic Growth[J]. Front Econ Chin, 2012, 7(1): 44-69.
[11] Ding Lu. Transition of China’s Growth Pattern[J]. Front Econ Chin, 2011, 6(4): 535-555.
[12] Wenpu Li, Min Gong. China’s Growth Model and Structural Unbalance in the Open Economy[J]. Front Econ Chin, 2011, 6(2): 327-344.
[13] Zhiqing Dong, Linhui Wang, Jia Sun. Factor Function Characteristics and Origin of Economic Growth of China[J]. Front Econ Chin, 2011, 6(2): 229-248.
[14] Shusong Ba, Shanshan Shen. Research on China’s Export Structure to the US: Analysis Based on the US Economic Growth and Exchange Rate[J]. Front Econ Chin, 2010, 5(3): 339-355.
[15] Yang Lu , . Do Environmental Regulations Influence the Competitiveness of Pollution-Intensive Products? [J]. Front. Econ. China, 2010, 5(2): 276-298.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed