Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Economics in China

ISSN 1673-3444

ISSN 1673-3568(Online)

CN 11-5744/F

Postal Subscription Code 80-978

Front. Econ. China    2015, Vol. 10 Issue (1) : 85-112    https://doi.org/10.3868/s060-004-015-0005-9
research-article |
Democracy and Economic Growth: Optimal Level and Transmission Channels
Pak Hung Mo()
School of Business, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China
 Download: PDF(312 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

After evening out all the benefits and costs, the overall optimal level of democracy is about 3.2, on a scale of 1 to 7. On average, fully dictatorial countries have a conditioned growth rate of –1.113 percent, fully democratic countries have a conditioned growth rate of 1.146 while countries with the optimal level of democracy/autocracy have a conditioned growth rate of 2.665. In the case of a fully dictatorial country, moving one unit towards democracy can raise the GDP growth rate by about 1.725 points; while for a fully democratic country, moving towards autocracy by one unit can raise the growth rate by about 0.885 points. This study provides useful information for many developing countries which are experiencing substantial pressures to restructure their political system.

Keywords economic growth      democracy      GDP      transmission      autocracy     
Issue Date: 23 March 2015
 Cite this article:   
Pak Hung Mo. Democracy and Economic Growth: Optimal Level and Transmission Channels[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2015, 10(1): 85-112.
 URL:  
http://academic.hep.com.cn/fec/EN/10.3868/s060-004-015-0005-9
http://academic.hep.com.cn/fec/EN/Y2015/V10/I1/85
[1] Jiwei Lou. The Possibility and Approaches to an Upper Middle Growth Rate[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2016, 11(2): 196-209.
[2] Robert Barro. China’s Growth Prospects[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2016, 11(2): 192-195.
[3] Jeffrey Frankel. China Is Not yet Number One[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2015, 10(1): 1-6.
[4] Derong Zhang. The Mechanism of the Middle Income Trap and the Potential Factors Influencing China’s Economic Growth[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2014, 9(3): 499-528.
[5] Ding Lu. How Green is China’s Path of Catching Up? An International Comparative Evaluation[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2014, 9(3): 484-498.
[6] Yanrui Wu. Productivity, Economic Growth and the Middle Income Trap: Implications for China[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2014, 9(3): 460-483.
[7] Kunyuan Qiao. Consumption Inequality in China: Theory and Evidence from the China Health and Nutrition Survey[J]. Front Econ Chin, 2013, 8(1): 91-112.
[8] Zhuoshun Xu, Leshun Xu. The Potential Impact of Sino-Korean Bilateral Trade on Economic Growth and the Environment: A CGE Model Analysis[J]. Front Econ Chin, 2012, 7(4): 560-579.
[9] Hongchun Zhao. An Accounting Method for Economic Growth[J]. Front Econ Chin, 2012, 7(1): 44-69.
[10] Ding Lu. Transition of China’s Growth Pattern[J]. Front Econ Chin, 2011, 6(4): 535-555.
[11] Wenpu Li, Min Gong. China’s Growth Model and Structural Unbalance in the Open Economy[J]. Front Econ Chin, 2011, 6(2): 327-344.
[12] Zhiqing Dong, Linhui Wang, Jia Sun. Factor Function Characteristics and Origin of Economic Growth of China[J]. Front Econ Chin, 2011, 6(2): 229-248.
[13] Shusong Ba, Shanshan Shen. Research on China’s Export Structure to the US: Analysis Based on the US Economic Growth and Exchange Rate[J]. Front Econ Chin, 2010, 5(3): 339-355.
[14] Justin Yifu LIN, Xifang SUN, . Banking structure and economic growth: Evidence from China[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2009, 4(4): 479-504.
[15] YAN Chengliang, GONG Liutang, . Government expenditure, taxation and long-run growth[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2009, 4(4): 505-525.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed