Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Economics in China

ISSN 1673-3444

ISSN 1673-3568(Online)

CN 11-5744/F

Postal Subscription Code 80-978

Front. Econ. China    2016, Vol. 11 Issue (4) : 581-607
Orginal Article |
R&D Returns, Spillovers and Firm Incentives: Evidence from China
Chorching Goh1(),Lixin Colin Xu2(),Wei Li3()
1. World Bank, Washington DC 20433, USA
2. World Bank, Washington DC 20433, USA
3. Cheung Kong Graduate School of Business, Beijing 100738, China
 Download: PDF(317 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Using a new data set of 12,000 firms in China, this paper estimates the returns to R&D investment and its spillover effects, and investigates how the returns to R&D depend on firm incentives. For the firms in the sample, the results show that on average firm output increases around 0.4 yuan for each additional 1 yuan spent on R&D in the previous year, and there is high R&D return regardless of whether the endogeneity of R&D intensity is dealt with or not. Interestingly, the marginal return to R&D is significantly higher in firms whose CEOs were not appointed by the government, and lower when CEO pay is directly related to annual performance. The return to R&D is higher in relatively poor regions and for firms with worse access to finance. There are also non-trivial R&D spillover effects.

Keywords R&D      returns      incentives      spillover     
Issue Date: 20 January 2017
 Cite this article:   
Chorching Goh,Lixin Colin Xu,Wei Li. R&D Returns, Spillovers and Firm Incentives: Evidence from China[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2016, 11(4): 581-607.
[1] Binlei Gong. Improving the Accuracy of Estimated Returns to Education in China—Based on Employment Rate, Career Length, and Income Growth[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2017, 12(1): 113-131.
[2] Mengnan Zhu,Qian Zhao,Yuguang Wang. The Political Cause of the Movement of RMB Exchange Rate:A Research Based on the Spillover Effects of US Political Cycle[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2016, 11(4): 694-731.
[3] Haiwen Zhou,Ruhai Zhou. A Dynamic Model of the Choice of Technology in Economic Development[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2016, 11(3): 498-518.
[4] Xu Li,Xiang Shao,Zhigang Tao. Hollowing out of the Real Economy: Evidence from China’s Listed Firms[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2016, 11(3): 390-409.
[5] Ming-Jen Chang,Ping Wang,Danyang Xie. The Dynamic Process of Economic Takeoff and Industrial Transformation[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2016, 11(1): 60-87.
[6] Keqiang Hou,Luke Chan,Xin Zeng. Information Linkages between Chinese and World Copper Futures Markets[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2015, 10(2): 272-300.
[7] Haiwen Zhou. International Trade with Increasing Returns in the Transportation Sector[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2014, 9(4): 606-633.
[8] Haiwen Zhou. Intermediate Inputs and External Economies[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2014, 9(2): 216-239.
[9] Jiandong Ju,Xuebing Yang. The Cosine-Shaped Pattern of Innovations and Technological Advantages: Theory and Evidence[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2013, 8(4): 476-489.
[10] William M. Tracy. Industry Mix and Curvilinear Spillovers from FDI in China[J]. Front. Econ. China, 2013, 8(4): 535-551.
[11] Haiwen Zhou. The Choice of Technology and Rural-Urban Migration in Economic Development[J]. Front Econ Chin, 2013, 8(3): 337-361.
[12] Yingyao Hu, Arthur Lewbel. Returns to Lying? Identifying the Effects of Misreporting When the Truth Is Unobserved[J]. Front Econ Chin, 2012, 7(2): 163-192.
[13] Kunrong Shen, Jian Li. Measurement of Technology Spillovers[J]. Front Econ Chin, 2012, 7(1): 141-161.
[14] Guoqing Zhao, Zhongyuan Zhang. Does Method Selection Matter? A New Look at FDI and Human Capital in Chinese High-Tech Industries[J]. Front Econ Chin, 2011, 6(1): 36-54.
[15] Liqun Zhou, Liangke Xia. ChinHow R&D Investments Influence TFP Growth: Evidence from China’s Large and Medium- Sized Industrial Enterprises[J]. Front Econ Chin, 2010, 5(4): 537-558.
Full text