1. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China 2. China Architecture Design & Research Group, Beijing 100044, China
In this paper, a quantitative life cycle model for carbon emission accounting was developed based on the life cycle assessment (LCA) theory. A residential building in Sino-Singapore Tianjin Eco-city (Tianjin, China) was selected as a sample, which had been constructed according to the concept of green environmental protection and sustainable development. In the scenario of this research, material production, construction, use and maintenance, and demolition phases were assessed by building carbon emission models. Results show that use and maintenance phase and material production phase are the most significant contributors to the life cycle carbon emissions of a building. We also analyzed some factor influences in LCA, including the thickness of the insulating layer and the length of building service life. The analysis suggest that thicker insulating layer does not necessarily produce less carbon emissions in the light of LCA, and if service life of a building increases, its carbon emissions during the whole life cycle will rise as well but its unit carbon emission will decrease inversely. Some advices on controlling carbon emissions from buildings are also provided.
IPCC. Climate Change 2007, the Fourth Assessment Report of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Stockholm: TERI Press, 2008
2
M Wei, X X Li. The convergence of carbon emission performance and cointegration analysis for China. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Management Science and Engineering 2010, Melbourne. Piscataway: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2010, 1580–1585
3
I Blom, L Itard, A Meijer. LCA-based environmental assessment of the use and maintenance of heating and ventilation systems in Dutch dwellings. Building and Environment, 2010, 45(11): 2362–2372 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.04.012
O Ortiz-Rodríguez, F Castells, G Sonnemann. Life cycle assessment of two dwellings: One in Spain, a developed country and one in Colombia, a country under development. Science of the Total Environment, 2012, 408(12): 2435–2443
F Asdrubali, C Baldassarri, V Fthenakis. Life cycle analysis in the construction sector: guiding the optimization of conventional Italian buildings. Energy and Buildings, 2013, 64(9): 73–89
8
I Zabalza Bribián, A Aranda Usón, S Scarpellini. Life cycle assessment in buildings: state-of-the-art and simplified LCA methodology as a complement for building certification. Building and Environment, 2009, 44(12): 2510–2520
9
A Sharma, A Saxena, M Sethi, V Shree, Varun. Life cycle assessment of buildings: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, 15(1): 871–875
10
S Proietti, P Sdringola, U Desideri, F Zepparelli, F Masciarelli, F Castellani. Life cycle assessment of a passive house in a seismic temperate zone. Energy and Buildings, 2013, 64(9): 463–472
11
L J Gu, D J Gu, B R Lin, Y X Zhu. Life cycle assessment for cooling and heating sources of building. In: Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality, Ventilation and Energy Conservation in Buildings: Sustainable Built Environment, 2007, Sendai. Sendai: Tohoku University Press, 2007, 773–780
12
L X Zhang, C B Wang, B Song. Carbon emission reduction potential of a typical household biogas system in rural China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2013, 47(10): 415–421 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.06.021
13
Y W Tian, Q Zhao, J Ge. Study on the life-cycle carbon emission and energy-efficiency management of the large-scale public buildings in Hangzhou, China. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computer and Management 2011, Wuhan. Piscataway: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2011
14
Swedish Defense Material Administration. Listing of GWP values as report IPCC GW1 Edition 1.0.
S Xing, Z Xu, G Jun. Inventory analysis of LCA on steel and concrete construction office building. Energy and Buildings, 2008, 40(7): 1188–1193
17
W Zhu, X Y Ying. Research on carbon emission performance during full life circle of steel structure residence. Advanced Materials Research, 2012, 461(20): 75–78 https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.461.75
18
D Z Li, H X Chen, E C M Hui, J B Zhang, Q M Li. A methodology for estimating the life-cycle carbon efficiency of a residential building. Building and Environment, 2013, 59(1): 448–455 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.09.012
19
D B Crawley, C O Pedersen, L K Lawrie, F C Winkelmann. Energy plus: energy simulation program. ASHRAE Journal, 2000, 42(4): 49–56
20
D B Crawley, L K Lawrie, F C Winkelmann, W F Buhl, Y J Huang, C O Pedersen, R K Strand, R J Liesen, D E Fisher, M J Witte, J Glazer. 2001, energy plus: creating a new-generation building energy simulation program. Energy and Building, 2001, 33(4): 319–331 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(00)00114-6
21
L J Gu, B R Lin, X R Zhou, Y X Zhu. Analysis of life cycle energy consumption and environmental load of insulation design for residential buildings in China. In: Proceedings of International Building Performance Simulation Association Conference 2009, Glasgow. Chicago: International Building Performance Simulation Association, 2009, 1842–1849
22
M Yuichi, N Keisuke. Energy Consumption and Carbon Dioxide Emission Intensities Based on Input–Output Analysis. Report of National Institute for Environmental Studies. Tokyo: Environment Agency of Japan, 1997
23
N X Liu, J Wang, R Li. Feasibility studies on the development of zero CO2 emission residential communities in China. In: Proceedings of 25th International Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture: Towards Zero Energy Building 2008, Dublin. Dublin: University College Dublin, 2008, 1867–1872
24
Z Z Wang, L C Fan, Hastak M. Life-cycle assessment of CO2 emissions of buildings. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Remote Sensing, Environment and Transportation Engineering 2011, Nanjing. Piscataway: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2011, 438–441
