|
|
EMERGY analysis for sustainability evaluation
of the Baiyangdian wetland ecosystem in China |
Weiqing MENG1,Cui HAO2,Hongyuan LI2,Meiting JU2, |
1.College of Urban and
Environmental Science, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387,
China; 2.College of Environmental
Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China; |
|
|
Abstract This study presents a quantitative and ecological benefit evaluation of the Baiyangdian wetland in China between the years 2000 and 2006. Methods of EMERGY analysis were applied to illustrate the wetland ecosystem, to evaluate the economic and environmental inputs and consequent yields, and to assess the sustainability of the Baiyangdian wetland. The indicators for the integrated ecological and economic system, such as EMERGY yield ratio (EYR) (7.51), EMERGY investment ratio (EIR) (4.52), environmental loading ratio (ELR) (2.92), EMERGY exchange ratio (0.41), and EMERGY sustainable indicator (ESI) (2.57) were calculated, compared, analyzed, and discussed. The non-renewable investment in Baiyangdian was greater than renewable investment, leading to the unsustainable development of the system. High EYR indicated that the Baiyangdian integrated system had created huge profits for its people, while ELR and ESI revealed that human behavior has been a heavy burden on the environment, and countermeasures should be taken by the Chinese government to relieve and resolve these problems. Potential management methods were also proposed in this paper.
|
Keywords
EMERGY analysis
sustainability
wetland ecosystem
indicators
|
Issue Date: 05 June 2010
|
|
|
Pannell D J, Glenn N A. A frameworkfor the economic evaluation and selection of sustainability indicatorsin agriculture. Ecological Economics, 2000, 33: 135–149
|
|
Chandre Gowda M J, Jayaramaiah K M. Comparative evaluation of rice production systems for their sustainability. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 1998, 69: 1–9
|
|
Abbona E A, Sarandón S J, Marasas M E, Astier M. Ecological sustainability evaluation of traditional managementin different vineyard systems in Berisso, Argentina. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2007, 119: 335–345
|
|
Shi C, Hutchinson S M, Xua S. Evaluation of coastal zonesustainability: An integrated approach applied in Shanghai Municipalityand Chong Ming Island. Journal of EnvironmentalManagement, 2004, 71: 335–344
|
|
Martin J F, Diemont S A W, Powell E, Stanton M, Levy-Tacher S. EMERGYevaluation of the performance and sustainability of three agriculturalsystems with different scales and management. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2006, 115: 128–140
|
|
Huppes G, Ishikawa M. Sustainabilityevaluation: Diverging routes recombined? Tasks for a new Working Groupon Modelling and Evaluation for Sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2007, 15: 1183–1184
|
|
Tony P. Fuzzy adaptive management of social and ecological carryingcapacities for protected areas. Journalof Environmental Management, 2009, 90: 2551–2557
|
|
Graymore M L M, Neil G S, Rickson R E. Sustaining Human Carrying Capacity: Atool for regional sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics, 2009, 16: 1–4
|
|
Hoekstra A Y. Human appropriation of natural capital: A comparisonof ecological footprint and water footprint analysis. Ecological Economics, 2009, 68: 1938–1951
|
|
Jeroen C J M, Bergh V D, Verbruggen H. Spatial sustainability, tradeand indicators: An evaluation of the ‘ecological footprint’. Ecological Economics, 1999, 29: 61–72
|
|
Rees W, Wackernagel M. Urbanecological footprints: Why cities cannot be sustainable—Andwhy they are a key to sustainability.EnvironmentalImpact Assessment Review, 1996, 16: 223–248
|
|
Odum H T. Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Decision Making. New York: John Wiley, 1995
|
|
Odum H T. An Energy Circuit Language for Ecological and SocialSystems: Its Physical Basis. In: Patten B, ed. In Systems Analysis and Simulationsin Ecology. New York: Academic Press, 1971a: 139–211
|
|
Bastianoni S, Campbell D, Susani L, Tiezzi E. The solar transformity of oil and petroleum natural gas. Ecological Modelling, 2005, 186: 212–220
|
|
Vassallo P, Bastianoni S, Beiso I, Ridolfi R, Fabiano M. EMERGYanalysis for the environmental sustainability of an inshore fish farmingsystem. Ecological Indicators, 2007, 7: 290–298
|
|
Ton S, Odum H T, Delfino J J. Ecological–economic evaluationof wetland management alternatives. EcologicalEngineering, 1998, 11: 291–302
|
|
Higgins J B. EMERGY analysis of the Oak Openings region. Ecological Engineering, 2003, 21: 75–109
|
|
Odum H T, Peterson N. Simulationand evaluation with energy systems blocks. Ecological Modelling, 1996, 93: 155–173
|
|
Tilley D R, Brown M T. Dynamic EMERGYaccounting for assessing the environmental benefits of subtropicalwetland stormwater management systems. Ecological Modelling, 2006, 192: 327–361
|
|
Ulgiati S, Brown M T. EMERGY evaluationsand environmental loading of alternative electricity production systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2001, 10: 335–348
|
|
John M, Rybczyk J C, Callaway J W, Day J. A relative elevation model for a subsiding coastal forestedwetland receiving wastewater effluent. Ecological Modelling, 1997, 112: 23–44
|
|
Ulgiati S, Odum H T, Bastianoni S. EMERGY use, environmentalloading and sustainability an EMERGY analysis of Italy. Ecological Modelling, 1994, 73: 215–268
|
|
Huang S L, Odum H T. Ecology andeconomy: EMERGY synthesis and public policy in Taiwan. Journal of Environmental Management, 1991, 32: 313–333
|
|
Huang S L, Wong J H, Chen T C. A framework of indicator system for measuring Taipei's urban sustainability. Landscapeand Urban Planning, 1998, 42: 15–27
|
|
Schroll H. Energy-flow and ecological sustainability in Danish agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment, 1994, 51: 301–310
|
|
Martin J F. EMERGY valuation of diversions of river water to marshesin the Mississippi River Delta. EcologicalEngineering, 2002, 18: 265–286
|
|
Brown M T, McClanahan T R. EMERGY analysis perspectives of Thailand and Mekong River dam proposals. Ecological Modelling, 1996, 91: 105–130
|
|
Qin P, Wong Y S, Tam N F Y. EMERGY evaluation of Mai Po mangrovemarshes. Ecological Engineering, 2000, 16: 271–280
|
|
Brown M T, Ulgiati S. EMERGY-basedindices and ratios to evaluate sustainability: Monitoring economiesand technology toward environmentally sound innovation. Ecological Engineering1997, 9: 51–69
|
|
Zhang S Z, Tian J W, Li G B. The Ecological problems and sustainabledevelopment countermeasures of the Bai Yang Dian wet land. South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science& Technology, 2007, 5: 53–60 (in Chinese)
|
|
Cai J M. Evaluation and classification of tourism resources inBaiyang Lake. Journal of Shanxi normaluniversity (Natural Science), 2007, 21: 105–109 (in Chinese)
|
|
Odum H T. Environment, Power and Society. New York: Wiley, 1971, 331
|
|
Castellini C, Bastianoni S, Granai C, Bosco A D, Brunetti M. Sustainabilityof poultry production using the EMERGY approach: Comparison of conventionaland organic rearing systems. Agriculture,Ecosystems & Environment, 2006, 114: 343–350
|
|
Lu H F, Lan S F, Li L, Peng S L. Studies onEMERGY indices for evaluating system sustainable development properties. China Environmental Science, 2002, 22: 380–384 (in Chinese)
|
|
Brown M T, Ulgiati S. Monitoringpatterns of sustainability in natural and man-made ecosystems. Ecological Modelling, 1998, 108: 23–36
|
|
Ulgiati S, Brown M T. Monitoringpatterns of sustainability in natural and man-made ecosystems. Ecological Modelling, 1998, 108: 23–36
|
|
Su J Q, Cheng S L, Guo Y C. Climate of Hebei Province. Beijing: Meteorological Press, 1996 (in Chinese)
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|