Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front Envir Sci Eng    0, Vol. Issue () : 640-657    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-013-0549-5
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Nexus security: governance, innovation and the resilient city
Michael Bruce BECK(), Rodrigo VILLARROEL WALKER
Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-2152, USA
 Download: PDF(224 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Nexus security is a compound mix of ideas: reconciling human needs and wants with access to multiple resources; diversity of access to those resources and services; resilience in the face of weather- and climate-related variability; resilience likewise in the face of infrastructure failure; and the personal, individual sense of belonging. At the level of Systems Thinking there is a very close relationship between resilience in the behavior of natural (ecological) systems and resilience in the social dynamics of governance within communities, where such resilience establishes the viability of these communities over centuries, which in turn entails successful stewardship of the man-environment relationship. We use insights from this cross-system mapping — across natural, built, and human systems — to assess, first, the role of city governance in achieving nexus security (or not) and, second, the role of technological innovations in serving the same purpose. More specifically, eight principles, covering resilience and diversity of access to resources and services, are used to gauge security-enhancing features of city buildings and infrastructure. Case studies include new designs of resilient office blocks, nutrient (nitrogen and phosphorus) recovery systems for sanitation and wastewater treatment, and the reconstruction of urban parks for the provision of ecosystem services. Throughout the paper, matters of risk in the face of meteorological variability are prominent. We do not conclude, however, that the presence of risk implies nexus insecurity.

Keywords cities as forces for good      climate variability      ecosystem services      energy and nutrient recovery      infrastructure failure      urban metabolism     
Corresponding Author(s): BECK Michael Bruce,Email:mbbeck@uga.edu   
Issue Date: 01 October 2013
 Cite this article:   
Michael Bruce BECK,Rodrigo VILLARROEL WALKER. Nexus security: governance, innovation and the resilient city[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng, 0, (): 640-657.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-013-0549-5
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y0/V/I/640
1 Cook C, Bakker K. Water security: debating an emerging paradigm. Global Environmental Change , 2012, 22(1): 94–102
doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.10.011
2 GWP. Towards Water Security: A Framework for Action. Stockholm: Global Water Partnership, 2000
3 Grey D, Sadoff C W. Sink or swim? Water security for growth and development. Water Policy , 2007, 9(6): 545–571
doi: 10.2166/wp.2007.021
4 Rijsberman F R.Water scarcity: fact or fiction? Agricultural Water Management , 2006, 80(1-3): 5–22
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2005.07.001
5 Whittington D, Sadoff C W, Allaire M. The economic value of moving toward a more water secure world. TEC Background Paper No 18 . Stockholm: Technical Committee (TEC), Global Water Partnership, 2013
6 Falkenmark M. The massive water scarcity now threatening Africa — why isn’t it being addressed? Ambio , 1989, 18(2): 112–118
7 Beck M B, Villarroel Walker R. On water security, sustainability, and the water-food-energy-climate nexus. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering , 2013, (in press)
8 Thompson M. A bit of the other: why scarcity isn’t all it’s cracked up to be. In: Mehta L, ed. The Limits to Scarcity. Contesting the Politics of Allocation . London: Earthscan, 2010,127–142
9 Beck M B, Villarroel Walker R, Thompson M. Smarter urban metabolism: earth systems re-engineering. Proceedings of the ICE- Engineering Sustainability , 2013, 166 (in press)
10 Wolman A. The metabolism of cities. Scientific American , 1965, 213(3): 179–190
doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0965-178 pmid:14338520
11 Villarroel Walker R, Beck M B. Understanding the metabolism of urban-rural ecosystems: a multi-sectoral systems analysis. Urban Ecosystems , 2012, 15(4): 809–848
doi: 10.1007/s11252-012-0241-8
12 Beck M B, Thompson M, Ney S, Gyawali D, Jeffrey P. On governance for re-engineering city infrastructure. Proceedings of the ICE- Engineering Sustainability , 2011, 164(2): 129–142
doi: 10.1680/ensu.2011.164.2.129
13 Beck M B. Vulnerability of water quality in intensively developing urban watersheds. Environmental Modelling & Software , 2005, 20(4): 379–380
doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.05.002
14 Beck M B. Cities as Forces for Good in the Environment: Sustainability in the Water Sector. Athens, Georgia: Warnell School of Forestry & Natural Resources, University of Georgia, 2011 (online as http://cfgnet.org/archives/587)
15 Holling C S. Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. In: Schulze P, ed. Engineering within Ecological Constraints . Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996, 31–44
16 Holling C S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics , 1973, 4(1): 1–23
doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
17 Taleb N N. Antifragile. Things that Gain from Disorder. New York: Random House, 2012
18 Beck MB.Transient pollution events: acute risks to the aquatic environment. Water Science and Technology , 1996, 33 (2):1–15 .
doi: 10.1016/0273-1223(96)00205-3
19 Beck M B, Jiang F, Shi F, Villarroel Walker R, Osidele O O, Lin Z, Demir I, Hall J W. Re-engineering cities as forces for good in the environment. Proceedings of the ICE- Engineering Sustainability , 2010, 163(1): 31–46
doi: 10.1680/ensu.2010.163.1.31
20 Peterson G, Allen C R, Holling C S. Ecological resilience, biodiversity, and scale. Ecosystems , 1998, 1(1): 6–18
doi: 10.1007/s100219900002
21 Mehta L. The Limits to Scarcity. Contesting the Politics of Allocation . London: Earthscan, 2010
22 Geels F. Co-evolution of technology and society: the transition in water supply and personal hygiene in the Netherlands (1850-1930) — a case study in multi-level perspective. Technology in Society , 2005, 27(3): 363–397
doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.04.008
23 Geels F. The hygienic transition from cesspools to sewer systems (1840-1930): the dynamics of regime transformation. Research Policy , 2006, 35(7): 1069–1082
doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.06.001
24 WEF. Water Security: The Water-Food-Energy-Climate Nexus. World Economic Forum (WEF) Water Initiative . Washington, DC: Island Press, 2011
25 Maslow A H. A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review , 1943, 50(4): 370–396
doi: 10.1037/h0054346
26 Arnstein S R. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners , 1969, 35(4): 216–224
doi: 10.1080/01944366908977225
27 Ney S. Resolving Messy Policy Problems: Handling Conflict in Environmental, Transport, Health and Ageing Policy. London: Earthscan, 2009
28 Thompson M. Man and nature as a single but complex system. In: Timmerman P, ed. Encyclopedia of Global Environmental Change , Vol 5. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 2002, 384–393
29 Holling C S. The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: Local surprise and global change. In: Clark W C, Munn R E, eds. Sustainable Development of the Biosphere . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1986, 292–317
30 Thompson M. Postscript: engineering and anthropology: is there a difference? In: Brown J, ed. Environmental Threats: Perception, Analysis and Management . New York: Belhaven, 1989, 138-150
31 Thompson M, Ellis R, Wildavsky A. Cultural theory. Boulder, Colorado: West View, 1990
32 Gyawali D, Dixit A. The construction and destruction of scarcity in development: water and power experiences in Nepal. In: Mehta L, ed. The Limits to Scarcity. Contesting the Politics of Allocation. London: Earthscan , 2010, 233–251
33 Calzadilla A, Rehdanz K, Tol R S J. The economic impact of more sustainable water use in agriculture: a computable general equilibrium analysis. Journal of Hydrology , 2010, 384(3-4): 292–305
doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.12.012
34 Fine B. Economics and scarcity: with Amartya Sen as a point of departure? In: Mehta L, ed. The Limits to Scarcity. Contesting the Politics of Allocation . London: Earthscan, 2010, 73–91
35 Thompson M.Beyond boom and bust. Royal Society of Arts Journal , 2008, (Winter):34–39
36 Ingram D, Thompson M.Eyes wide open: Towards rational adaptability. Wilmot Magazine , 2010, 48 (July): 60–64
37 Lietaer B, Ulanowicz R, Goerner S. Options for Managing a Systemic Bank Crisis. Surveys and Perspectives Integrating ENvironment & Society , SAPIENS [Online], 2009, 2 (1). Available online at http://sapiens.revues.org/2747 (accessed April6, 2009)
38 Moddemeyer S. Understanding the nature of change: building resilience into urban life. Water21, 2012, August: 14–18
39 Liao K H.A theory on urban resilience to floods: a basis for alternative planning practices. Ecology and Society , 2012, 17(4): 48
40 Everard M, Shuker L, Gurnell A. The Mayes Brook restoration in Mayesbrook Park, East London: An Ecosystem Services Assessment. Report. Bristol, UK: Environment Agency, 2011
41 Gatzweiler F W. Organizing a public ecosystem service economy for sustaining biodiversity. Ecological Economics , 2006, 59(3): 296–304
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.10.017
42 Rittmann B E. The energy issue in urban water management. In: Larsen T A, Udert K M, Lienert J, eds. Source Separation and Decentralization for Wastewater Management . London: IWA Publishing, 2013, 13–27
43 Villarroel Walker R, Beck M B.Innovation, multi-utility service businesses and sustainable cities: where might be the next breakthrough? Water Practice & Technology , 2012, 7(5):
doi: 10.2166/wpt.2012.084
44 Fussler C. Responsible excellence pays. Journal of Corporate Citizenship , 2004, 16(September): 33–44
45 Villarroel Walker R. Sustainability beyond eco-efficiency: A multi-sectoral systems analysis of water, nutrients, and energy. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree . Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia, 2010
46 Villarroel Walker R, Beck M B. How to re-balance the nitrogen metabolism of the Atlanta-Chattahoochee system? Paper presented at the Georgia Water Resources Conference , Athens, GA, USA. 2011. Available online at http://www.gawrc.org/2011proceedings.html(accessed May6, 2013)
47 Villarroel Walker R, Beck M B, Hall J W. Water — and nutrient and energy — systems in urbanizing watersheds. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering , 2012, 6(5): 596–611
doi: 10.1007/s11783-012-0445-4
48 Barles S. Feeding the city: food consumption and flow of nitrogen, Paris, 1801-1914. Science of the Total Environment , 2007, 375(1-3): 48–58
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.12.003 pmid:17270249
49 Barles S. Urban metabolism and river systems: An historical perspective — Paris and the Seine, 1790-1970. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions , 2007, 4(3): 1845–1878
doi: 10.5194/hessd-4-1845-2007
50 Mihelcic J R, Fry L M, Shaw R. Global potential of phosphorus recovery from human urine and feces. Chemosphere , 2011, 84(6): 832–839
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.02.046 pmid:21429554
51 Schmid Neset T S, Bader H P, Scheidegger R, Lohm U. The flow of phosphorus in food production and consumption — Link?ping, Sweden, 1870-2000. Science of the Total Environment , 2008, 396(2-3): 111–120
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.02.010 pmid:18377956
52 Drechsel P, Erni M. Analysing the nexus of sanitation and agriculture at municipal scale. Urban Agriculture Magazine , 2010, 23(April): 11–12
53 Dagerskog L, Coulibaly C, Ouandaoga I. The emerging market of treated human excreta in Ouagadougou. Urban Agriculture Magazine , 2010, 23(April): 45–48 (available at http://www.ruaf.org; accessed May6, 2013)
54 Force J. The ultimate recycling. Treatment Plant Operator , 2011, September: 12–17
55 Krchnak K M, Smith D M, Deutz A. Putting nature in the Nexus: Investing in natural infrastructure to advance water-energy-food security. Background paper for stakeholder engagement process, Bonn2011 Conference: The Water, Energy and Food Security Nexus . The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia
56 Pellett K. Salmon river watershed enrichment for fish habitat restoration. Report (Project # 09.CBR.03) . Nanaimo, British Columbia: British Columbia Conservation Foundation, 2010
57 Londong J. Practical experience with source separation in Germany. In: Larsen T A, Udert K M, Lienert J, eds. Source Separation and Decentralization for Wastewater Management . London: IWA Publishing , 2013, 423–430
58 Truffer B, Binz C, Gebauer H, St?rmer E. Market success of on-site treatment: A systemic innovation problem. In: Larsen T A, Udert K M, Lienert J, eds. Source Separation and Decentralization for Wastewater Management . London: IWA Publishing, 2013, 209–223
59 Harrington E. Building a coastal wetland in the heart of a city. Nature , 2012, 486(7402): 189
60 Fitzpatrick C.Sustainable shopping at London’s Westfield Stratford city. Water21 , 2012, February: 18
61 Salingaros N A. Principles of Urban Structure. Amsterdam: Techne Press, 2005
62 Crutzen P J, Beck M B, Thompson M. (2007) Cities. Blue Ribbon Panel on Grand Challenges for Engineering, US National Academy of Engineering . Available, online at http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/cms/7125/8602.aspx (accessed May6, 2013)
63 D'Arcy B. SUDS mania in Tasmania: leading the way in sustainable urban drainage. Water21 , 2012, February: 34–36
64 Force J. Treepeople spreads the word on sustainable stormwater management. Water21 , 2012, February: 28–30
65 Olsson G. The potential of control and monitoring. In: Larsen T A, Udert K M, Lienert J, eds. Source Separation and Decentralization for Wastewater Management. London: IWA Publishing, 2013, 179–192
66 Beck M B, Villarroel Walker R, Thompson M. Changing the metabolism of coupled human-built-natural systems. In: Dawson R J, Walsh C L, Kilsby C G, eds. Earth Systems Engineering 2012: A Technical Symposium on Systems Engineering for Sustainable Adaptation to Global Change. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Centre for Earth Systems Engineering Research, Newcastle University, 2012, 11–32
67 Stenstr?m T A. Hygiene, a major challenge for source separation and decentralization. In: Larsen T A, Udert K M, Lienert J, eds. Source Separation and Decentralization for Wastewater Management . London: IWA Publishing, 2013, 151–161
68 Billen G, Garnier J, Barles S. History of the urban environmental imprint: introduction to a multidisciplinary approach to the long-term relationships between western cities and their hinterland. Regional Environmental Change , 2012, 12(2): 249–253
doi: 10.1007/s10113-012-0298-1
69 Kim E, Barles S. The energy consumption of Paris and its supply areas from the eighteenth century to the present. Regional Environmental Change , 2012, 12(2): 295–310
doi: 10.1007/s10113-011-0275-0
70 Marsden T, Sonnino R.Human health and wellbeing and the sustainability of urban-regional food systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability , 2012, 4(4): 427–430
doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.09.004
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed