Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front Envir Sci Eng    2014, Vol. 8 Issue (1) : 117-127    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-013-0581-5
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Application of k-means clustering to environmental risk zoning of the chemical industrial area
Weifang SHI, Weihua ZENG()
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
 Download: PDF(600 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The homogeneous risk characteristics within a sub-area and the heterogeneous from one sub-area to another are unclear using existing environmental risk zoning methods. This study presents a new zoning method by determining and categorizing the risk characteristics using the k-means clustering data mining technology. The study constructs indices and develops index quantification models for environmental risk zoning by analyzing the mechanism of environmental risk occurrence. We calculate the source risk index, air risk field index, water risk field index, and target vulnerability of the study area with Nanjing Chemical Industrial Park using a 100 m × 100 m mesh grid as the basic zoning unit, and then use k-means clustering to analyze the environmental risk in the area. We obtain the optimal clustering number with the largest average silhouette coefficient by calculating the average silhouette coefficients of clustering at different k-values. The clustering result with the optimal clustering number is then used for the environmental risk zoning, and the zoning result is mapped using the geographic information system. The study area is divided into five sub-areas. The common environmental risk characteristics within the same sub-area, as well as the differences between sub-areas, are presented. The zoning is helpful in risk management and is convenient for decision makers to distribute limited resources to different sub-areas in the design of risk reducing intervention.

Keywords environmental risk zoning      k-means clustering      silhouette coefficient      chemical industrial park      risk management     
Corresponding Author(s): ZENG Weihua,Email:zengwh@bnu.edu.cn   
Issue Date: 01 February 2014
 Cite this article:   
Weifang SHI,Weihua ZENG. Application of k-means clustering to environmental risk zoning of the chemical industrial area[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng, 2014, 8(1): 117-127.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-013-0581-5
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2014/V8/I1/117
Fig.1  Industrial park location and study area coverage
Fig.2  Wind direction rose chart of the study area
indicesindicators
source risk indexchemical release quantity
emission time
median lethal dose
industry risk level
risk control mechanism
air risk field indexdistance to risk source
wind direction frequencies
water risk field indexattenuation coefficient
flow velocity
river section length
target vulnerabilitypopulation density
critical facilities coefficient
ecosystem type coefficient
GDP per capita
medical treatment level
Tab.1  Indicator system for environmental risk zoning
industry categoriesrisk levels /(accident death rate ? year-1)
mining1.40×10-4
petroleum refining0.40×10-4
chemicals1.12×10-4
transportation and public utility0.52×10-4
Tab.2  Risk levels of some major industries in China
indicatorsweights
equipment maintenance time rate (g1)0.210
staff safety training time rate (g2)0.384
staff with college or higher education rate (g3)0.223
automatic monitoring and protective facilities asset rate (g4)0.118
emergency response drill time rate (g5)0.065
Tab.3  Indicators of risk control mechanism and their weights
ecosystem typescoefficients
construction land1.0
grassland1.1
pond1.2
cropland1.2
woodland1.4
Tab.4  Coefficients of ecosystem types
ranks of hospitalsassigned values
levelsclasses
first3rd0.1
2nd0.2
1st0.3
second3rd0.4
2nd0.5
1st0.6
third3rd0.7
2nd0.8
1st0.9
Tab.5  Assigned values corresponding to the ranks of hospitals
Fig.3  Spatial distribution of the source risk index
Fig.4  Air risk field index contours of the study area
Fig.5  Spatial distribution of the water risk field index
Fig.6  Spatial distribution of the target vulnerability
Fig.7  Average silhouette coefficient versus clustering number
Fig.8  Environmental risk zoning map of the study area
1 Fadlelmawla A A, Fayad M, El-Gamily H, Rashid T, Mukhopadhyay A, Kotwicki V. A land surface zoning approach based on three-component risk criteria for groundwater quality protection. Water Resources Management , 2011, 25(6): 1677–1697
2 de Oliveira P T S, Sobrinho T A, Rodrigues D B B, Panachuki E. Erosion risk mapping applied to environmental zoning. Water Resources Management , 2011, 25(3): 1021–1036
3 Fell R, Corominas J, Bonnard C, Cascini L, Leroi E, Savage W Z. Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land-use planning. Engineering Geology , 2008, 102(3–4): 99–111
4 Gupta A K, Suresh I V, Misra J, Yunus M. Environmental risk mapping approach: risk minimization tool for development of industrial growth centres in developing countries. Journal of Cleaner Production , 2002, 10(3): 271–281
5 Merad M M, Verdel T, Roy B, Kouniali S. Use of multi-criteria decision-aids for risk zoning and management of large area subjected to mining-induced hazards. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology , 2004, 19(2): 125–138
6 Calvo F, Moreno B, Ramos á, Zamorano M. Implementation of a new environmental impact assessment for municipal waste landfills as tool for planning and decision-making process. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews , 2007, 11(1): 98–115
7 Dagnino A, Sforzini S, Dondero F, Fenoglio S, Bona E, Jensen J, Viarengo A A. A “weight of evidence” approach for the integration of environmental “triad” data to assess ecological risk and biological vulnerability. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management , 2008, 4(3): 314–326
pmid:18393577
8 Lan D D, Liu R Z, Zeng W H. Technique to regional risk zonation of environmental pollution accident and its application. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering , 2009, 17(Suppl): 82–91 (in Chinese)
9 Tingsanchali T, Karim F. Flood-hazard assessment and risk-based zoning of a tropical flood plain: case study of the Yom River, Thailand. Hydrological Sciences Journal–Journal Des Sciences Hydrologiques , 2010, 55(2): 145–161
10 Yang J, Bi J, Li Q L, Zhang B. Study on theory and methodology of regional environmental risk zoning. Research of Environmental Sciences , 2006, 19(4): 132–137 (in Chinese)
11 Xu L Y, Liu G Y. The study of a method of regional environmental risk assessment. Journal of Environmental Management , 2009, 90(11): 3290–3296
pmid:19525058
12 Zeng W H, Cheng S T. Introduction to environmental catastrophology. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2000 (in Chinese)
13 Zeng W H, Cheng S T. Risk forecasting and evaluating model of environmental pollution accident. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China) , 2005, 17(2): 263–267
pmid:16295902
14 Crichton D. The risk triangle. In: Ingleton J, ed. Natural Disaster Management. London: Tudor Rose, 1999, 102–103
15 Crichton D. UK and global insurance responses to flood hazard. Water International , 2002, 27(1): 119–131
16 Lugeri N, Kundzewicz Z W, Genovese E, Hochrainer S, Radziejewski M. River flood risk and adaptation in Europe-assessment of the present status. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change , 2010, 15(7): 621–639
17 Hu E B. Environmental Risk Assessment Practical Technology, Method and Cases. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2009 (in Chinese)
18 Liverman D M. Vulnerability to global environmental change. In: Kasperson J X, Kasperson R E, eds. Global Environmental Risk . Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2001, 201–216
19 Schneider S, Sarukhan J. Overview of impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability to climate change. In: McCarthy J J, Canziani O F, Leary N A, Dokken D J, White K S, eds. Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, 75–103
20 Peichl M, Leava N A, Kiely G. Above- and belowground ecosystem biomass, carbon and nitrogen allocation in recently afforested grassland and adjacent intensively managed grassland. Plant and Soil , 2012, 350(1–2): 281–296
21 Mu M, Wang B. Nonlinear instability and sensitivity of a theoretical grassland ecosystem to finite-amplitude perturbations. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics , 2007, 14(4): 409–423
22 Tan P N, Steinbach M, Kumar V. Introduction to Data Mining. Boston: Pearson Addison Wesley, 2006
23 Everitt B S, Landau S, Leese M, Stahl D. Cluster Analysis. 5th ed. Chichester: John Wiley, 2011
24 Kaufman L, Rousseeuw P J. Finding Groups in Data: an Introduction to Cluster Analysis. New Jersey: John Wiley, 2005
[1] Hong CHEN,Feng XIAO,Zhe BI,Ping XIAO,Dongsheng WANG,Ming YANG. Practical evaluation for water utilities in China by using analytic hierarchy process[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2015, 9(1): 131-137.
[2] Lei HUANG, Zhijuan SHAO, Weiliang BAO, Bailing DUAN, Jun BI, Zengwei YUAN. The influencing factors of the WTP for the risk reduction of chemical industry accidents in China[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng, 2012, 6(6): 860-868.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed