Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.    2015, Vol. 9 Issue (1) : 164-170    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-014-0747-9
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Role of water chemistry on estrone removal by nanofiltration with the presence of hydrophobic acids
Xue JIN1,*(),Jiangyong HU2
1. School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8LT, UK
2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117576, Singapore
 Download: PDF(397 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Hydrophobic acid organic matter (HpoA) extracted from treated effluent has been known to improve the rejection of steroid hormone estrone by reverse osmosis (RO) and nanofiltration (NF) membranes. In this study, the effects of solution chemistry (solution pH and ionic strength) on the estrone rejection by NF membrane with the presence of HpoA were systematically investigated. Crossflow nanofiltration experiments show that the presence of HpoA significantly improved estrone rejection at all pH and ionic strength levels investigated. It is consistently shown that the “enhancement effect” of HpoA on estrone rejection at neutral and alkaline pH is attributed to the binding of estrone by HpoA macromolecules via hydrogen bonding between phenolic functional groups in feed solutions, which leads to an increase in molecular weight and appearance of negative charge. The membrane exhibited the best performance in terms of estrone rejection at pH 10.4 (compared to pH 4 and pH 7) as a result of strengthening the electrostatic repulsion between estrone and membrane with the presence of HpoA. At neutral pH level, the ability of HpoA macromolecules to promote estrone rejection became stronger with increasing ionic strength due to their more extended conformation, which created more chances for the association between estrone and HpoA. The important conclusion of this study is that increasing solution pH and salinity can greatly intensify the “enhancement effect” of HpoA. These results can be important for NF application in direct/indirect potable water reuse.

Keywords indirect potable water reuse      steroid hormone      nanofiltration(NF)      rejection      water chemistry      hydrophobic acids     
Corresponding Author(s): Xue JIN   
Online First Date: 25 July 2014    Issue Date: 31 December 2014
 Cite this article:   
Xue JIN,Jiangyong HU. Role of water chemistry on estrone removal by nanofiltration with the presence of hydrophobic acids[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2015, 9(1): 164-170.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-014-0747-9
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2015/V9/I1/164
Fig.1  Effect of HpoA on estrone rejection by DL membrane
Fig.2  DOC rejection in HpoA-containing solution at different pH levels
pH increment in estrone rejection/% decrease in permeate water flux/%
4 31.9 12
7 29.8 7.4
10.4 54.1 NA
Tab.1  Influence of HpoA on DL membrane performance at later stage of filtration
Fig.3  Zeta potential of DL membrane in electrolyte background solution and HpoA-containing solution
Fig.4  Effect of HpoA on estrone rejection by DL membrane at different NaCl concentrations
Fig.5  DOC rejection in HpoA-containing solution at different NaCl concentrations
Fig.6  Charge density of HpoA
1 Baker V A. Endocrine disrupters—testing strategies to assess human hazard. Toxicology In Vitro, 2001, 15(4-5): 413-419
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-2333(01)00045-5 pmid: 11566572
2 Tim Z. In vitro bioassays for assessing estrogenic substances. Environmental Science & Technology, 1997, 31(3): 613-623
https://doi.org/10.1021/es960530o
3 Iguchi T, Watanabe H, Katsu Y. Developmental effects of estrogenic agents on mice, fish, and frogs: a mini-review. Hormones and Behavior, 2001, 40(2): 248-251
https://doi.org/10.1006/hbeh.2001.1675 pmid: 11534989
4 Desbrow C, Routledge E J, Brighty G C, Sumpter J P, Waldock M. Identification of estrogenic chemicals in STW effluent. 1. Chemical fractionation and in vitro biological screening. Environmental Science & Technology, 1998, 32(11): 1549-1558
https://doi.org/10.1021/es9707973
5 Ternes T A, Stumpf M, Mueller J, Haberer K, Wilken R D, Servos M. Behavior and occurrence of estrogens in municipal sewage treatment plants—I. Investigations in Germany, Canada and Brazil. Science of the Total Environment, 1999, 225(1-2): 81-90
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(98)00334-9 pmid: 10028705
6 Johnson A C, Sumpter J P. Removal of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in activated sludge treatment works. Environmental Science & Technology, 2001, 35(24): 4697-4703
https://doi.org/10.1021/es010171j pmid: 11775141
7 Baronti C, Curini R, D'Ascenzo G, Corcia A D, Gentili A, Samperi R. Monitoring natural and synthetic estrogens at activated sludge sewage treatment plants and in a receiving river water. Environmental Science & Technology, 2000, 34(24): 5059-5066
https://doi.org/10.1021/es001359q
8 Williams R J, Johnson A C, Smith J J L, Kanda R. Steroid estrogens profiles along river stretches arising from sewage treatment works discharges. Environmental Science & Technology, 2003, 37(9): 1744-1750
https://doi.org/10.1021/es0202107 pmid: 12775044
9 Nghiem L D, Sch?fer A I, Elimelech M. Pharmaceutical retention mechanisms by nanofiltration membranes. Environmental Science & Technology, 2005, 39(19): 7698-7705
https://doi.org/10.1021/es0507665 pmid: 16245847
10 Sch?fer A I, Nghiem L D, Waite T D. Removal of the natural hormone estrone from aqueous solutions using nanofiltration and reverse osmosis. Environmental Science & Technology, 2003, 37(1): 182-188
https://doi.org/10.1021/es0102336 pmid: 12542309
11 Jin X, Hu J, Ong S L. Removal of natural hormone estrone from secondary effluents using nanofiltration and reverse osmosis. Water Research, 2010, 44(2): 638-648
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.09.057 pmid: 19879623
12 Nghiem L D, Sch?fer A I, Elimelech M. Removal of natural hormones by nanofiltration membranes: measurement, modeling, and mechanisms. Environmental Science & Technology, 2004, 38(6): 1888-1896
https://doi.org/10.1021/es034952r pmid: 15074703
13 Jin X, Hu J, Ong S L. Influence of dissolved organic matter on estrone removal by NF membranes and the role of their structures. Water Research, 2007, 41(14): 3077-3088
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.04.025 pmid: 17548103
14 Bellona C, Drewes J E, Xu P, Amy G. Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes during NF/RO treatment—A literature review. Water Research, 2004, 38(12): 2795-2809
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.03.034 pmid: 15223273
15 Childress A E, Elimelech M. Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 1996, 119(2): 253-268
https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(96)00127-5
16 Childress A E, Elimelech M. Relating nanofiltration membrane performance to membrane charge (electrokinetic) characteristics. Environmental Science & Technology, 2000, 34(17): 3710-3716
https://doi.org/10.1021/es0008620
17 Jin X. Rejection of steroid hormone estrone by NF/RO membranes. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Singapore: National University of Singapore, 2007
18 Tang C, Kwon Y N, Leckie J O. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by humic acid—Effects of solution composition and hydrodynamic conditions. Journal of Membrane Science, 2007, 290(1-2): 86-94
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.12.017
19 Ghosh K, Schnitzer M. Macromolecular structures of humic substances. Soil Science, 1980, 129(5): 266-276
https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-198005000-00002
20 Hu J Y, Jin X, Ong S L. Rejection of estrone by nanofiltration: Influence of solution chemistry. Journal of Membrane Science, 2007, 302(1-2): 188-196
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2007.06.043
21 Illés E, Tombácz E. The role of variable surface charge and surface complexation in the adsorption of humic acid on magnetite. Colloids and Surface A. Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2004, 230(1-3): 99-109
22 Tombácz E, Libor Z, Illés E, Majzik A, Klumpp E. The role of reactive surface sites and complexation by humic acids in the interaction of clay mineral and iron oxide particles. Organic Geochemistry, 2004, 35(3): 257-267
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2003.11.002
23 Ephraim J H, Pettersson C, Allard B. Correlations between acidity and molecular size distributions of an aquatic fulvic acid. Environment International, 1996, 22(5): 475-483
https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-4120(96)00039-6
[1] Xiaowei WANG, Wenjun LIU, Weifang MA, Desheng LI, . Arsenic (V) removal from groundwater by GE-HL nanofiltration membrane: effects of arsenic concentration, pH, and co-existing ions[J]. Front.Environ.Sci.Eng., 2009, 3(4): 428-433.
[2] JI Shulan, LIU Zhipeng, REN Haiyan, LIU Zhipei. Isolation and characterization of a bacterial strain that efficiently degrades sex steroid hormones[J]. Front.Environ.Sci.Eng., 2007, 1(3): 325-328.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed