Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.    2017, Vol. 11 Issue (6) : 18    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-017-0966-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE
PM10 emissions from industrial coal-fired chain-grate boilers
Xinghua Li1(), Junzan Han1, Lei Duan2
1. School of Space and Environment, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
2. School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
 Download: PDF(344 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

PM in submicron mode emitted from raw coal burning contribute to 33 % of PM10.

PM in submicron mode from briquette coal burning contribute to 86 % of PM10.

Collection efficiency of muticlones and scrubbers is 34% for submicron particle.

Peak of submicron mode in normal operation period is larger than start-up period.

Industrial coal-fired boiler is an important air pollutant emission source in China. The chain-grate boiler is the most extensively used type of industrial coal-fired boiler. An electrical low-pressure impactor, and a Dekati® Low Pressure Impactor were applied to determine mass and number size distributions of PM10 at the inlet and the outlet of the particulate emission control devices at six coal-fired chain-grate boilers. The mass size distribution of PM10 generated from coal-fired chain-grate boilers generally displays a bimodal distribution that contains a submicron mode and a coarse mode. The PM in the submicron mode for burning with raw coal contributes to 33%±10 % of PM10 emissions, much higher than those for pulverized boilers. And the PM in the submicron mode for burning with briquette contributes up to 86 % of PM10 emissions. Multiclones and scrubbers are not efficient for controlling PM10 emission. Their average collection efficiencies for sub-micron particle and super-micron particle are 34% and 78%, respectively. Operating conditions of industrial steam boilers have influence on PM generation. Peak of the submicron mode during normal operation period is larger than the start-up period.

Keywords coal-fired chain-grate boiler      PM10      size distribution      particulate emission control devices      size-dependent collection efficiency     
Corresponding Author(s): Xinghua Li   
Issue Date: 12 July 2017
 Cite this article:   
Xinghua Li,Junzan Han,Lei Duan. PM10 emissions from industrial coal-fired chain-grate boilers[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(6): 18.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-017-0966-y
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2017/V11/I6/18
boiler No.123456
nominal capacity/ (t·h-1)a224102040
testing load/%9510080806080
PECDs typemulticlonenonemulticlonespray drying towerbspray scrubbercwater dust scrubberc
Tab.1  Description of tested industrial coal-fired chain-grate boilers
Fig.1  Sampling system (a) ELPI and (b) LPI
Fig.2  Mass (a) and number (b) size distributions of PM10 at the inlet of PECDs
Fig.3  Contributions of PM in the submicron mode to PM10 from this study and previous studies from pulverized boilers
Fig.4  Mass (a) and number (b) size distributions of PM10 at the outlet of PECDs
Fig.5  Size-dependent collection efficiencies of PM10 by various PECDs
Fig.6  PM2.5 concentration variation from the start-up to the normal operation of the boiler
Fig.7  PM2.5 number size distributions variation during the start-up and the normal operation periods of the boiler
1 Ministry of Environmental Protection. China. Available online at . (accessed 12th Dec. 12, 2015)
2 NevilleM, QuannR J, HaynesB S, SarofimA F. Vaporization and condensation of mineral matter during pulverized coal combustion.Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 1981, 18(1): 1267–1274
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(81)80130-0
3 QuannR J, NevilleM, JanghorbaniM, MimsC A, SarofimA F. Mineral matter and trace-element vaporization in a laboratory-pulverized coal combustion system.Environmental Science & Technology, 1982, 16(11): 776–781
https://doi.org/10.1021/es00105a009 pmid: 22299785
4 McElroyM W, CarrR C, EnsorD S, MarkowskiG R. Size distribution of fine particles from coal combustion.Science, 1982, 215(4528): 13–19
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.215.4528.13 pmid: 17790449
5 MoisioM. Real time size distribution measurement of combustion aerosols. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Tampere: Tampere University of Technology, 1999
6 YiH, HaoJ, DuanL, LiX, GuoX. Characteristics of inhalable particulate matter concentration and size distribution from power plants in China.Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2006, 56(9): 1243–1251
https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2006.10464590 pmid: 17004679
7 SuiJ, XuM, DuY, LiuY, YuD, YiG. Emission characteristics and chemical composition of PM10 from two coal fired power plants in China.Journal of the Energy Institute, 2007, 80(4): 192–198 doi:10.1179/174602207X242418  
8 SeamesW S. An initial study of the fine fragmentation fly ash particle mode generated during pulverized coal combustion.Fuel Processing Technology, 2003, 81(2): 109–125 doi:10.1016/S0378-3820(03)00006-7
9 LinakW P, MillerC A, SeamesW S, WendtJ O L, IshinomoriT, EndoY, MiyamaeS. On trimodal particle size distributions in fly ash from pulverized-coal combustion.Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2002, 29(1): 441–447
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1540-7489(02)80058-X
10 YuD, XuM, YaoH, SuiJ, LiuX, YuY, CaoQ. Use of elemental size distributions in identifying particle formation modes.Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2007, 31(2): 1921–1928
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2006.07.115
11 ZhaoZ, DuQ, ZhaoG, GaoJ, DongH, CaoY, HanQ, YuanP, SuL. Fine particle emission from an industrial coal-fired circulating fluidized-bed boiler equipped with a fabric filter in China.Energy & Fuels, 2014, 28(7): 4769–4780
https://doi.org/10.1021/ef500558g
12 TurnS R. An Introduction to Combustion: Concepts and Applications. 2nd ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2000
13 ZhangY, SchauerJ J, ZhangY, ZengL, WeiY, LiuY, ShaoM. Characteristics of particulate carbon emissions from real-world Chinese coal combustion.Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(14): 5068–5073
https://doi.org/10.1021/es7022576 pmid: 18754349
14 GeS, BaiZ, LiuW, ZhuT, WangT, QingS, ZhangJ. Boiler briquette coal versus raw coal: Part I—Stack gas emissions.Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2001, 51(4): 524–533
https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2001.10464293 pmid: 28072241
15 China Pollution Source Census. Available online at (accessed Dec. 12, 2015)
16 KeskinenJ, PietarinenK, LehtimäkiM J. Electrical low pressure impactor.Journal of Aerosol Science, 1992, 23(4): 353–360
https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(92)90004-F
17 Dekati Ltd Technical Note.Unidealities in ELPITM mass measurement.
18 Dekati@ DI-1000 diluter brochure. Available online at (accessed Dec. 12, 2015)
19 DLPI brochure. Available online at . (accessed Dec. 12, 2015)
20 State Environmental Protection Administration of China. Handbook of Pollutant Generation and Emission Factors from Industrial Sources. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 1996
21 LichtW. Air Pollution Control Engineering: Basic Calculations for Particulate Collection, 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1988
22 KimH T, JungC H, OhS N, LeeK W. Particle removal efficiency of gravitational wet scrubber considering diffusion, interception, and impaction.Environmental Engineering Science, 2001, 18(2): 125–136
https://doi.org/10.1089/10928750151132357
23 DirgoJ, LeithD. Cyclone collection efficiency: comparison of experimental results with theoretical predictions.Aerosol Science and Technology, 1985, 4(4): 401–415
https://doi.org/10.1080/02786828508959066
24 ZhaoB. Development of a new method for evaluating cyclone efficiency.Chemical Engineering and Processing, 2005, 44(4): 447–451
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0255-2701(04)00149-7
25 LeeB K, MohanB R, ByeonS H, LimK S, HongE P. Evaluating the performance of a turbulent wet scrubber for scrubbing particulate matter.Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2013, 63(5): 499–506
https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2012.738626 pmid: 23786141
26 LiuX, XuM, YaoH, YuD, GaoX, CaoQ, CaiY. Effect of combustion parameters on the emission and chemical composition of particulate matter during coal combustion.Energy & Fuels, 2007, 21(1): 157–162
https://doi.org/10.1021/ef060324u
[1] Min Gao, Ziye Yang, Yajie Guo, Mo Chen, Tianlei Qiu, Xingbin Sun, Xuming Wang. The size distribution of airborne bacteria and human pathogenic bacteria in a commercial composting plant[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(3): 39-.
[2] Pol Masclans Abelló, Vicente Medina Iglesias, M. Antonia de los Santos López, Jesús Álvarez-Flórez. Real drive cycles analysis by ordered power methodology applied to fuel consumption, CO2, NOx and PM emissions estimation[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 4-.
[3] Guoxia MA,Jinnan WANG,Fang YU,Yanshen ZHANG,Dong CAO. An assessment of the potential health benefits of realizing the goals for PM10 in the updated Chinese Ambient Air Quality Standard[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(2): 288-298.
[4] Jieqiong LIU,Jingkun JIANG,Qiang ZHANG,Jianguo DENG,Jiming HAO. A spectrometer for measuring particle size distributions in the range of 3 nm to 10 μm[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(1): 63-72.
[5] Xinfeng WANG, Wenxing WANG, Likun XUE, Xiaomei GAO, Wei NIE, Yangchun YU, Yang ZHOU, Lingxiao YANG, Qingzhu ZHANG, Tao WANG. Size-resolved aerosol ionic composition and secondary formation at Mount Heng in South Central China[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng, 2013, 7(6): 815-826.
[6] Can DONG, Lingxiao YANG, Chao YAN, Qi YUAN, Yangchun YU, Wenxing WANG. Particle size distributions, PM2.5 concentrations and water-soluble inorganic ions in different public indoor environments: a case study in Jinan, China[J]. Front Envir Sci Eng, 2013, 7(1): 55-65.
[7] Xiaoyan SHI, Kebin HE, Jie ZHANG, Yongliang MA, Yunshan GE, Jianwei TAN, . A comparative study of particle size distribution from two oxygenated fuels and diesel fuel[J]. Front.Environ.Sci.Eng., 2010, 4(1): 30-34.
[8] LOU Shujuan, MAO Jietai, WANG Meihua. Observation of black carbon aerosol in Beijing, 2003[J]. Front.Environ.Sci.Eng., 2007, 1(3): 345-349.
[9] ZHAO Peng, ZHU Tong, LIANG Baosheng, HU Min, KANG Ling, GONG Jicheng. Characteristics of mass distributions of aerosol particle and its inorganic water-soluble ions in summer over a suburb farmland in Beijing[J]. Front.Environ.Sci.Eng., 2007, 1(2): 159-165.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed