|
|
Effect of 2-butenal manufacture wastewater to methanogenic activity and microbial community |
Guangqing Song1,2,3, Hongbo Xi2,3(), Xiumei Sun1,2,3, Yudong Song2,3, Yuexi Zhou2,3() |
1. College of Water sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China 2. Research Center of Water Pollution Control Technology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China 3. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environment Sciences, Beijing 100012, China |
|
|
Abstract The inhibition ratio sharply increased with the increasing COD. The absorbance of UV-vis at 420 nm showed a linear correlation with the SMA. The molecular structure of EPS has changed when COD was 9585 mg/L. Illumina Miseq sequencing was employed to reveal the microbial composition. The synthesis of 2-butenal, which is a vital raw material for the production of sorbic acid as a food preservative, generates some toxic by-products, so it is urgent to seek better detoxification strategies for the treatment of 2-butenal manufacture wastewater. In this study, batch experiments were carried out to investigate the inhibition effect of wastewater on the methanogenic activity. To understand the wastewater toxicity to anaerobic granular sludge, variations of the specific methanogenic activity (SMA) and extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) constituents at various wastewater CODs were investigated. Ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectra and Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were employed to analyze the structure of the EPS. The results showed that the inhibitory ratio of 2-butenal manufacture wastewater was less than 8.4% on the anaerobic granular sludge when the CODs were less than 959 mg/L. However, the inhibitory ratio increased from 36.4% to 93.6% when CODs increased from 2396 mg/L to 9585 mg/L, with the SMA decreasing from 39.1 mL CH4/(gVSS·d) to 3.2 mL CH4/(gVSS·d). The diversity of the microbial community under various CODs was researched by Illumina 16S rRNA Miseq sequencing and the results demonstrated that Proteiniphilum、Petrimonas and Syntrophobacter were the dominant bacteria genera in all sample. Regarding archaea, Methanobacterium was the most dominated archaea genera, followed by the Methanosaeta group in all samples. Moreover, the bacterial communities had changed obviously with increasing CODs, which indicated high CODs played a negative impact on the richness and diversity of bacterial community in the sludge samples.
|
Keywords
2-butenal manufacture wastewater
Methanogenic activity
Specific methanogenic activity (SMA)
Extracellular polymeric substance (EPS)
Microbial community
|
Corresponding Author(s):
Hongbo Xi,Yuexi Zhou
|
Issue Date: 23 August 2018
|
|
1 |
Aquino S F, Stuckey D C (2004). Soluble microbial products formation in anaerobic chemostats in the presence of toxic compounds. Water Research, 38(2): 255–266
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2003.09.031
pmid: 14675637
|
2 |
Castello E, Santos C G Y, Iglesias T, Paolino G, Wenzel J, Borzacconi L, Etchebehere C (2009). Feasibility of biohydrogen production from cheese whey using a UASB reactor: Links between microbial community and reactor performance. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34(14): 5674–5682
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.05.060
|
3 |
Chen S Y, Dong X Z (2005). Proteiniphilum acetatigenes gen. nov., sp. nov., from a UASB reactor treating brewery wastewater. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 55(Pt 6): 2257–2261
https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.63807-0
pmid: 16280479
|
4 |
Cheng J Y, Kanjo Y, Suidan M T, Venosa A D (1996). Anaerobic biotransformation of 2,4-dinitrotoluene with ethanol as primary substrate: Mutual effect of the substrates on their biotransformation. Water Research, 30(2): 307–314
https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(95)00169-7
|
5 |
Díaz E, Amils R, Sanz J L (2003). Molecular ecology of anaerobic granular sludge grown at different conditions. Water Science and Technology, 48(6): 57–64
pmid: 14640200
|
6 |
Dong F, Zhao Q B, Zhao J B, Sheng G P, Tang Y, Tong Z H, Yu H Q, Li Y Y, Harada H (2010). Monitoring the restart-up of an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor for the treatment of a soybean processing wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 101(6): 1722–1726
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.10.011
pmid: 19896839
|
7 |
DuBois M, Gilles K A, Hamilton J K, Rebers P A, Smith F (1956). Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Chemistry, 28(3): 350–356
https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017
|
8 |
Foladori P, Bruni L, Tamburini S (2014). Toxicant inhibition in activated sludge: fractionation of the physiological status of bacteria. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 280: 758–766
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.09.003
pmid: 25240645
|
9 |
Grabowski A, Tindall B J, Bardin V, Blanchet D, Jeanthon C (2005). Petrimonas sulfuriphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a mesophilic fermentative bacterium isolated from a biodegraded oil reservoir. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 55(Pt 3): 1113–1121
https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.63426-0
pmid: 15879242
|
10 |
Gu A Z, Hedlund B P, Staley J T, Strand S E, Stensel H D (2004). Analysis and comparison of the microbial community structures of two enrichment cultures capable of reductively dechlorinating TCE and cis-DCE. Environmental Microbiology, 6(1): 45–54
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003.00525.x
pmid: 14686940
|
11 |
Ioannou L A, Li Puma G, Fatta-Kassinos D (2015). Treatment of winery wastewater by physicochemical, biological and advanced processes: A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 286: 343–368
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.12.043
pmid: 25636058
|
12 |
Klindworth A, Pruesse E, Schweer T, Peplies J, Quast C, Horn M, Glöckner F O (2013). Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Research, 41(1): e1
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks808
pmid: 22933715
|
13 |
Krakat N, Schmidt S, Scherer P (2011). Potential impact of process parameters upon the bacterial diversity in the mesophilic anaerobic digestion of beet silage. Bioresource Technology, 102(10): 5692–5701
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.02.108
pmid: 21435870
|
14 |
Li Y F, Shi J, Nelson M C, Chen P H, Graf J, Li Y B, Yu Z T (2016). Impact of different ratios of feedstock to liquid anaerobic digestion effluent on the performance and microbiome of solid-state anaerobic digesters digesting corn stover. Bioresource Technology, 200: 744–752
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.078
pmid: 26575616
|
15 |
Lin R C, Cheng J, Ding L K, Song W L, Zhou J H, Cen K F (2015). Sodium borohydride removes aldehyde inhibitors for enhancing biohydrogen fermentation. Bioresource Technology, 197: 323–328
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.105
pmid: 26342346
|
16 |
Liu C, Li H, Zhang Y Y, Si D D, Chen Q W (2016). Evolution of microbial community along with increasing solid concentration during high-solids anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Bioresource Technology, 216: 87–94
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.048
pmid: 27235970
|
17 |
Mizuno K, Morishita Y, Ando A, Tsuchiya N, Hirata M, Tanaka K (2012). Genus-specific and phase-dependent effects of nitrate on a sulfate-reducing bacterial community as revealed by dsrB-based DGGE analyses of wastewater reactors. World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 28(2): 677–686
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-011-0862-8
pmid: 22806863
|
18 |
Morgan J W, Forster C F, Evison L (1990). A comparative study of the nature of biopolymers extracted from anaerobic and activated sludges. Water Research, 24(6): 743–750
https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(90)90030-A
|
19 |
Ohtsuki T, Sato K, Sugimoto N, Akiyama H, Kawamura Y (2012). Absolute quantitative analysis for sorbic acid in processed foods using proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Analytica Chimica Acta, 734: 54–61
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2012.04.033
pmid: 22704472
|
20 |
Oliveira S V W B, Moraes E M, Adorno M A T, Varesche M B A, Foresti E, Zaiat M (2004). Formaldehyde degradation in an anaerobic packed-bed bioreactor. Water Research, 38(7): 1685–1694
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.01.013
pmid: 15026223
|
21 |
Owen W F, Stuckey D C, Healy Jr J B, Young L Y, McCarty P L (1979). Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity. Water Research, 13(6): 485–492
https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(79)90043-5
|
22 |
Pereira N S, Zaiat M (2009). Degradation of formaldehyde in anaerobic sequencing batch biofilm reactor (ASBBR). Journal of Hazardous Materials, 163(2-3): 777–782
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.028
pmid: 18715712
|
23 |
Shakoori A R, Makhdoom M, Haq R U (2000). Hexavalent chromium reduction by a dichromate-resistant gram-positive bacterium isolated from effluents of tanneries. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 53(3): 348–351
https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530050033
pmid: 10772478
|
24 |
Tran T, Bolto B, Gray S, Hoang M, Ostarcevic E (2007). An autopsy study of a fouled reverse osmosis membrane element used in a brackish water treatment plant. Water Research, 41(17): 3915–3923
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.06.008
pmid: 17617435
|
25 |
Venkiteshwaran K, Milferstedt K, Hamelin J, Fujimoto M, Johnson M, Zitomer D H (2017). Correlating methane production to microbiota in anaerobic digesters fed synthetic wastewater. Water Research, 110: 161–169
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.12.010
pmid: 28006706
|
26 |
Wang Y, Wang Q H, Li M, Yang Y N, He W, Yan G X, Guo S H (2016). An alternative anaerobic treatment process for treatment of heavy oil refinery wastewater containing polar organics. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 105: 44–51
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2015.08.012
|
28 |
Wang Z C, Gao M C, Wang S, Xin Y J, Ma D, She Z L, Wang Z, Chang Q B, Ren Y (2014). Effect of hexavalent chromium on extracellular polymeric substances of granular sludge from an aerobic granular sequencing batch reactor. Chemical Engineering Journal, 251: 165–174
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.04.078
|
27 |
Wang Z W, Wu Z C, Tang S J (2009). Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) properties and their effects on membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Water Research, 43(9): 2504–2512
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.02.026
pmid: 19285331
|
29 |
Wei D, Li M T, Wang X D, Han F, Li L S, Guo J, Ai L J, Fang L L, Liu L, Du B, Wei Q (2016). Extracellular polymeric substances for Zn (II) binding during its sorption process onto aerobic granular sludge. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 301: 407–415
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.09.018
pmid: 26410269
|
30 |
Xie S B, Wu Y Q, Wang W T, Wang J S, Luo Z P, Li S Y (2014). Effects of acid/alkaline pretreatment and gamma-ray irradiation on extracellular polymeric substances from sewage sludge. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 97: 349–353
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2013.07.026
|
31 |
Zhang D Q, Tan S K, Gersberg R M (2010). Municipal solid waste management in China: status, problems and challenges. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(8): 1623–1633
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.012
pmid: 20413209
|
32 |
Zhang X W, Yue Q Y, Yue D T, Gao B Y, Wang X J (2015). Application of Fe0/C/Clay ceramics for decoloration of synthetic Acid Red 73 and Reactive Blue 4 wastewater by micro-electrolysis. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 9(3): 402–410
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-014-0659-8
|
33 |
Zhao X G, Jiang G W, Li A, Li Y (2016). Technology, cost, a performance of waste-to-energy incineration industry in China. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55: 115–130
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.137
|
34 |
Zhu L, Qi H Y, Lv M L, Kong Y, Yu Y W, Xu X Y (2012). Component analysis of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) during aerobic sludge granulation using FTIR and 3D-EEM technologies. Bioresource Technology, 124: 455–459
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.059
pmid: 23022627
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|