The evolution of particle size distribution function (PSDF) of soot in premixed flames of benzene and toluene was studied on a burner stabilized stagnation (BSS) flame platform. The cold gas velocities were changed to hold the maximum flame temperatures of different flames approximately constant. The PSDFs of all the test flames exhibited a bimodal distribution, i.e., a small-size nucleation mode and a large-size accumulation mode. It was observed that soot nucleation and particle growth in the benzene flame were stronger than those in the toluene flame at short residence times. At longer residence times, the PSDFs of the two flames were similar, and the toluene flame showed a larger particle size distribution range and a higher particle volume fraction than the benzene flame.
H Omidvarborna, A Kumar, D S Kim. Recent studies on soot modeling for diesel combustion. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 48: 635–647 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.019
3
F Zhao, W Yang, D Zhou, W Yu, J Li, K L Tay. Numerical modelling of soot formation and oxidation using phenomenological soot modelling approach in a dual-fueled compression ignition engine. Fuel, 2017, 188: 382–389 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.10.054
4
I A Reşitoğlu, K Altinisik, A Keskin. The pollutant emissions from diesel-engine vehicles and exhaust after treatment systems. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2015, 17(1): 15–27 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0793-9
5
EUR-Lex Website. Council Directive 91/441/EEC of 26 June 1991 amending Directive 70/220/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to measures to be taken against air pollution by emissions from motor vehicles. 1991, available at website of eur-lex.europa.eu
6
EUR-Lex Website. Commission Regulation (EU) No 459/2012 of 29 May 2012 amending Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 as regards emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 6). 2012–06–01, available at website of eur-lex.europa.eu
7
M Frenklach, D W Clary, W C Gardiner Jr, S E Stein. Effect of fuel structure on pathways to soot. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1986, 21(1):1067–1076 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(88)80337-0
8
Y Wang, A Makwana, S Iyer, M Linevsky, R J Santoro, T A Litzinger, J O’Connor. Effect of fuel composition on soot and aromatic species distributions in laminar, co-flow flames. Part 1. Non-premixed fuel. Combustion and Flame, 2018, 189: 443–455 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.08.011
9
G W Sidebotham, I Glassman. Flame temperature, fuel structure, and fuel concentration effects on soot formation in inverse diffusion flames. Combustion and Flame, 1992, 90(3–4): 269–283 https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(92)90088-7
10
J D Butler, P Crossley. Reactivity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons adsorbed on soot particles. Atmospheric Environment, 1981, 15(1): 91–94 https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(81)90129-3
11
R A Sobotowski, A D Butler, Z Guerra. A pilot study of fuel impacts on PM emissions from light-duty gasoline vehicles. SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants, 2015, 8(1): 214–233 https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-9071
12
M J DeWitt, E Corporan, J Graham, D Minus. Effects of aromatic type and concentration in Fischer-Tropsch fuel on emissions production and material compatibility. Energy & Fuels, 2008, 22(4): 2411–2418 https://doi.org/10.1021/ef8001179
13
D Z Short, D Vu, T D Durbin, G Karavalakis, A Asa-Awuku. Components of particle emissions from light-duty spark-ignition vehicles with varying aromatic content and octane rating in gasoline. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(17): 10682–10691 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03138
14
H Richter, S Granata, W H Green, J B Howard. Detailed modeling of PAH and soot formation in a laminar premixed benzene/oxygen/argon low-pressure flame. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2005, 30(1): 1397–1405 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2004.08.088
J Wei, C Song, G Lv, J Song, L Wang, H Pang. A comparative study of the physical properties of in-cylinder soot generated from the combustion of n-heptane and toluene/n-heptane in a diesel engine. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2015, 35(2): 1939–1946 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2014.06.011
17
N Hansen, M Schenk, K Moshammer, K Kohse-Höinghaus. Investigating repetitive reaction pathways for the formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in combustion processes. Combustion and Flame, 2017, 180: 250–261 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.09.013
18
J Camacho. Development of a novel heterogeneous flow reactor-Soot formation and nanoparticle catalysis. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, 2013
19
B Simmons, A Williams. A shock tube investigation of the rate of soot formation for benzene, toluene, and toluene/n-heptane mixtures. Combustion and Flame, 1988, 71(3): 219–232 https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(88)90060-0
20
A Ergut, Y A Levendis, H Richter, J B Howard, J Carlson. The effect of equivalence ratio on the soot onset chemistry in one-dimensional, atmospheric-pressure, premixed ethylbenzene flames. Combustion and Flame, 2007, 151(1–2): 173–195 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2007.04.009
21
B Gigone, A E Karatas, Ö L Gülder. Soot aggregate morphology in coflow laminar ethylene diffusion flames at elevated pressures. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2019, 37(1): 841–848 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2018.06.103
22
M M Maricq. A comparison of soot size and charge distributions from ethane, ethylene, acetylene, and benzene/ethylene premixed flames. Combustion and Flame, 2006, 144(4): 730–743 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2005.09.007
23
Q Tang, B Ge, Q Ni, B Nie, X You. Soot formation characteristics of n-heptane/toluene mixtures in laminar premixed burner-stabilized stagnation flames. Combustion and Flame, 2018, 187: 239–246 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.08.022
24
A D Abid, E D Tolmachoff, D J Phares, H Wang, Y Liu, A Laskin. Size distribution and morphology of nascent soot in premixed ethylene flames with and without benzene doping. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2009, 32(1): 681–688 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2008.07.023
25
C A Echavarria, A F Sarofim, J A S Lighty, A D’Anna. Evolution of soot size distribution in premixed ethylene/air and ethylene/benzene/air flames: experimental and modeling study. Combustion and Flame, 2011, 158(1): 98–104 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.07.021
26
B Lin, H Gu, B Guan, D Han, C Gu, Z Huang, H Lin. Size evolution of soot particles from gasoline and n-heptane/toluene blend in a burner stabilized stagnation flame. Fuel, 2017, 203: 135–144 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.04.097
27
C R Shaddix. Correcting thermocouple measurements for radiation loss: a critical review. Aibuquerque, NM, 1999, HTD99–HT282
28
R C Peterson, N M Laurendeau. The emittance of yttrium-beryllium oxide thermocouple coating. Combustion and Flame, 1985, 60(3): 279–284 https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(85)90033-1
29
C Shao, B Guan, B Lin, H Gu, C Gu, Z Li, H Lin, Z Huang. Effect of methane doping on nascent soot formation in ethylene-based laminar premixed flames. Fuel, 2016, 186: 422–429 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.08.081
30
H Lin, C Gu, J Camacho, B Lin, C Shao, R Li, H Gu, B Guan, H Wang, Z Huang. Mobility size distributions of soot in premixed propene flames. Combustion and Flame, 2016, 172: 365–373 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.07.002
31
M D Smooke, I K Puri, K A Seshadri. A comparison between numerical calculations and experimental measurements of the structure of a counterflow diffusion flame burning diluted methane in diluted air. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1988, 21(1): 1783–1792 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(88)80412-0
32
R J Kee, J A Miller, G H Evansl, G Dixon-Lewis. A computational model of the structure and extinction of strained, opposed flow, premixed methane-air flames. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1989, 22(1): 1479–1494 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(89)80158-4
33
A E Lutz, R J Kee, J F Grcar, F M Rupley. OPPDIF: a Fortran program for computing opposed-flow diffusion flames. Sandia National Laboratories, Albu-querque, New Mexico, 1996 https://doi.org/10.2172/568983
34
B Zhao, Z Yang, Z Li, M V Johnston, H Wang. Particle size distribution function of incipient soot in laminar premixed ethylene flames: effect of flame temperature. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2005, 30(1): 1441–1448 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2004.08.104
35
A D Abid, N Heinz, E D Tolmachoff, D J Phares, C S Campbell, H Wang. On evolution of particle size distribution functions of incipient soot in premixed ethylene–oxygen–argon flames. Combustion and Flame, 2008, 154(4): 775–788 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2008.06.009
36
L Waldmann. The force of a non-homogeneous gas on small suspended spheres. Zeitshrift fur Naturforschung Section A—A Journal of Physical Sciences, 1959, 14a: 589–599
37
Z Li, H Wang. Drag force, diffusion coefficient, and electric mobility of small particles II: application. Physical Review. E, 2003, 68(6): 061207 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.68.061207
38
F S Lai, S K Friedlander, J Pich, G M Hidy. The self-preserving particle size distribution for Brownian coagulation in the free-molecule regime. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 1972, 39(2): 395–405 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(72)90034-3
