Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Medicine

ISSN 2095-0217

ISSN 2095-0225(Online)

CN 11-5983/R

Postal Subscription Code 80-967

2018 Impact Factor: 1.847

Front Med Chin    2009, Vol. 3 Issue (1) : 13-19    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-009-0016-7
REVIEW
Application progress of lymphography in oncology
Yang YU1, Jibin LIU2, Lixue YIN1()
1. Institute of Ultrasound Medicine, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, Chengdu 610072, China; 2. Division of Diagnostic Ultrasound, Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia PA19107, USA
 Download: PDF(103 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Lymphography is often used for the diagnosis of lymphatic metastasis in oncology. Determination of lymphatic metastasis is extremely important for accurate cancer staging, which may directly guide the clinical therapeutic scheme. In recent years, the technology of lymphography has developed rapidly on the basis of traditional lymphography, with the appearance of computed tomography (CT) lymphography, nuclear magnetic resonance (MR) lymphography, contrast-enhanced lymphosonography, and so on; the diagnostic accuracy has also been improved. The imaging principles and methods of these various technologies of lymphography are reviewed in this paper, and their applications and significance in oncology are also discussed in detail.

Keywords lymphography      lymphatic metastasis      sentinel lymph node biopsy     
Corresponding Author(s): YIN Lixue,Email:yinlixue@yahoo.com   
Issue Date: 05 March 2009
 Cite this article:   
Yang YU,Jibin LIU,Lixue YIN. Application progress of lymphography in oncology[J]. Front Med Chin, 2009, 3(1): 13-19.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fmd/EN/10.1007/s11684-009-0016-7
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fmd/EN/Y2009/V3/I1/13
1 Kelley M C, Hansen N, McMaster K M. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Am J Surg , 2004, 188(1): 49-61
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.10.028
2 Lang J H, Huang R L, Wu B Z. Lymphography in ovarian cancers. Zhonghua Fuchanke Zazhi , 1989, 24(1): 29-31 (in Chinese)
3 Musumeci R, Palo G, Conti U, Kenda R, Mangioni C, Belloni C, Marzi M, Bandieramoute G. Are retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis a major problem in endometrial adenocarcinoma? Diagnostic and prognostic assessment with lymphography. Cancer , 1980, 46(8): 1887-1892
doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19801015)46:8<1887::AID-CNCR2820460831>3.0.CO;2-1
4 Weiner S A, Lee J K, Kao M S, Moon T E. The role of lymphangiography in vulvar carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol , 1986, 154(5): 1073-1075
5 Marks L B, Shipley W U, Walker T G, Waltman A C. Role of lymphangiography in staging testicular seminoma. Urology , 1991, 38(3): 264-266
doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(91)80360-J
6 Maranzano E, Latini P, Checcaglini F, Beneventi S, Panizza B M, Perrucci E, Baffa S, Rossi L, Caprino G. Role of lymphangiography and abdomino-pelvic CT in uterine tumors. Radiol Med (Torino) , 1990, 79(6): 599-602
7 Fernando I N, Moskovic E, Fryatt I, Glaholm J, Blake P R. Is there still a role for lymphography in the management of early carcinoma of the cervix?Br J Radiol , 1994, 67: 1052-1056
8 Suga K, Yuan Y, Okada M, Matsunaga N, Tangoku A, Ymamoto S, Oka M. Breast sentinel lymph node mapping at CT lymphography with iopamidolβ: preliminary experience. Radiology , 2004, 230(2): 543-552
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2302021380
9 Suga K, Shimizu K, Kawakami Y, Tangoku A, Zaki M, Matsunaga N, Oka M. Lymphatic drainage from esophagogastric tract: feasibility of endoscopic CT lymphography for direct visualization of pathways. Radiology , 2005, 237(3): 952-960
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2373041578
10 Fischbein N J, Noworolski S M, Henry R G, Henry R G, Kaplan M J, Dillon W P, Nelson S J. Assessment of metastatic cervical adenopathy using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol , 2003, 24(3): 301-311
11 Murray A D, Staff R T, Redpath T W, Gilbert F J, Ah See K, Brookes J A, Miller I D, Payne S. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the axilla in women with breast cancer: comparison with pathology of excised nodes. Br J Radiol , 2002, 75(891): 220-228
12 Kvistad K A, Rydland J, Smethurst H B, Lundgren S, Fjosne H E, Gribbestad I S, Nilsen G. Axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: preoperative detection with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Eur Radiol , 2000, 10(9): 1464-1471
doi: 10.1007/s003300000370
13 Sigal R, Vogl T, Casselman J, Moulin G, Veillon F, Hermans R, Dubrulle F, Viala J, Bosq J, Mack M, Depondt M, Mattelaer C, Petit P, Champsaur P, Riehm S, Dadashitazehozi Y, de Jaegere T, Marchal G, Chevalier D, Lemaitre L, Kubiak C, Helmberger R, Halimi R. Lymph node metastases from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: MR imaging with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles (Sinerem MR)-results of a phase-III multicenter clinical trial. Eur Radiol , 2002, 12(5): 1104-1113
doi: 10.1007/s003300101130
14 Bellin M F, Roy C, Kinkel K,Thoumas D, Zaim S, Vanel D, Tuchmann C, Richard F, Jacqin D, Dellcour A, Challier E, Lebret T, Cluzel P. Lymph node metastases: safety and effectiveness of MR imaging with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles-initial clinical experience. Radiology , 1998, 207(3): 799-808
15 Anzai Y, Piccoli C W, Outwater E K, Standford W, Bluemke D A, Nurenberg P, Saini S, Maravilla K R, Feldman D E, Schmiedl U P, Brunberg J A, Francis I R, Harms S E, Som P M, Tempany C M. Evaluation of neck and body metastases to nodes with ferumoxtran 10-enhanced MR imaging: phase III safety and efficacy study. Radiology , 2003, 228(3): 777-788
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2283020872
16 Krag D, Weaver D, Ashikaga T, Moffat F, Klimberg V S, Shriver C, Feldman S, Kusminsky R, Gadd M, Kuhn J, Harlow S, Beitsch P. The sentinel node in breast cancer-a multicenter validation study. New Engl J Med , 1998, 339(14): 941-946
doi: 10.1056/NEJM199810013391401
17 Vucetic B, Rogan S A, Balenovic A, Ivkic M, Situm M, Hudorovic N, Kusic Z. The role of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in surgery planning for sentinel node biopsy in malignant melanoma. Wien Klin Wochenschr , 2006, 118(9-10): 286-293
18 Mikhaeel N G, Timothy A R, O’Doherty M J, Hain S, Hain S, Mainsey M N. 18-FDG-PET as a prognostic indicator in the treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma-comparison with CT. Leuk Lymphoma , 2000, 39(5-6): 543-553
19 Schneider A, Hertel H. Surgical and radiographic staging in patients with cervical cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol , 2004, 16(1): 11-18
doi: 10.1097/00001703-200402000-00004
20 Aquino S L, Asmuth J C, Alper N M, Halpern E F, Fischman A J. Improved radiologic staging of lung cancer with 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography and computed tomography registration. J Comput Assist Tomogr , 2003, 27(4): 479-484
doi: 10.1097/00004728-200307000-00004
21 Lardinois D, Weder W, Hany T F, Kamel E M, Korom S, Seifert B, Von Schulthess G K, Sternert H C. Staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography. N Engl J Med , 2003, 348(25): 2500-2507
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022136
22 Wister E R, Ferrara K W, Short R E, Ottoboni T B, Gabe J D, Patel D. Sentinel node detection using contrast-enhanced power Doppler ultrasound lymphography. Invest Radiol , 2003, 38(6): 358-365
doi: 10.1097/00004424-200306000-00007
23 Goldberg B B, Merton D A, Liu J B,Thakur M, Murphy G F, Needleman L, Tornes A, Forsberg F. Sentinel lymph nodes in a swine model with melanoma: contrast-enhanced lymphatic ultrasound. Radiology , 2004, 230(3): 727-734
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2303021440
24 Goldberg B B, Merton D A, Liu J B, Murphy G, Forsberg F. Contrast-enhanced sonographic imaging of lymphatic channels and sentinel lymph nodes. J Ultrasound Med , 2005, 24(7): 953-965
25 Curry J M, Bloedon E, Malloy K M, Cognetti D M, Merton D A, Goldberg B B, Keane V M, Rosen D, Pribitkin E A. Ultrasound-guided contrast-enhanced sentinel node biopsy of the head and neck in a porcine model. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg , 2007, 137(5): 735-741
doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.07.019
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed