|
|
“Fast Track” nasogastric decompression of rectal cancer surgery |
Ka Li1, Zongguang Zhou1,2(), Zengrong Chen1, Yi Zhang2, Cun Wang1,2 |
1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; 2. Institute of Digestive Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China |
|
|
Abstract This study evaluates the application of fast track (FT) nasogastric decompression in patients who underwent anterior resection of rectal cancer. A randomized control trial was performed comparing the group with the fast track treatment (n =β57) and the group with traditional nasogastric decompression (n =β84). Preoperative characteristics and postoperative recovery indices were recorded and analyzed. The results indicate no significant differences in gender (P =β0.614), age (P =β0.653), tumor location (P =β0.113), and TNM stages (P =β0.054) were observed between the 2 groups. The differences in the type of resection, anastomosis, and adoption of protective colostomy were all not significant between the FT and the traditional group. During the first 24 hours after surgery, the volume of nasogastric drainage averaged 197 ml in the FT group and 155 ml in the traditional group (P =β0.197). The initiation of test-meal (P =β0.000), semiliquid diet (P =β0.002), and ordinary diet (P =β0.008) were all significantly shorter in the FT group. Furthermore, compared with the other group, the patients in the FT group enjoyed earlier removal of the abdominal drainage, urinary catheter, and shorter hospital stays (P =β0.000). Based on a correlation test, the duration of nasogastric decompression is related to the time of test-meal and semiliquid diet. The routine usage of nasogastric decompression in rectal surgery is unnecessary. The fast track procedure might help in facilitating postoperative functional and diet recovery, reducing the time of catheterization, and shortening hospital stay.
|
Keywords
fast track
nasogastric decompression
rectal cancer
surgery
|
Corresponding Author(s):
Zhou Zongguang,Email:zhou767@163.com
|
Issue Date: 05 September 2011
|
|
1 |
Nelson R, Tse B, Edwards S. Systematic review of prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal operations. Br J Surg 2005; 92(6): 673-680 doi: 10.1002/bjs.5090 pmid:15912492
|
2 |
Nelson R, Edwards S, Tse B. Prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (3): CD004929 pmid:17636780
|
3 |
Hasenberg T, L?ngle F, Reibenwein B, Schindler K, Post S, Spies C, Schwenk W, Shang E. Current perioperative practice in rectal surgery in Austria and Germany. Int J Colorectal Dis 2010; 25(7): 855-863 doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-0900-2 pmid:20174809
|
4 |
Rao W, Zhang X, Zhang J, Yan R, Hu Z, Wang Q. The role of nasogastric tube in decompression after elective colon and rectum surgery: a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2011; 26(4): 423-429 doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-1093-4 pmid:21107848
|
5 |
Yang Z, Zheng Q, Wang Z. Meta-analysis of the need for nasogastric or nasojejunal decompression after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Br J Surg 2008; 95(7): 809-816 doi: 10.1002/bjs.6198 pmid:18551533
|
6 |
Kelly MJ, Lloyd TD, Marshall D, Garcea G, Sutton CD, Beach M. A snapshot of MDT working and patient mapping in the UK colorectal cancer centres in 2002. Colorectal Dis 2003; 5(6): 577-581 doi: 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2003.00531.x pmid:14617244
|
7 |
Wilmore DW, Kehlet H. Management of patients in fast track surgery. BMJ 2001; 322(7284): 473-476 doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7284.473 pmid:11222424
|
8 |
Schwenk W, Neudecker J, Raue W, Haase O, Müller JM. “Fast-track” rehabilitation after rectal cancer resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006; 21(6): 547-553 doi: 10.1007/s00384-005-0056-7 pmid:16283339
|
9 |
Kehlet H. Fast-track colorectal surgery. Lancet 2008; 371(9615): 791-793 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60357-8 pmid:18328911
|
10 |
Montgomery RC, Bar-Natan MF, Thomas SE, Cheadle WG. Postoperative nasogastric decompression: a prospective randomized trial. South Med J 1996; 89(11): 1063-1066 doi: 10.1097/00007611-199611000-00007 pmid:8903288
|
11 |
Wichmann MW, Eben R, Angele MK, Brandenburg F, Goetz AE, Jauch KW. Fast-track rehabilitation in elective colorectal surgery patients: a prospective clinical and immunological single-centre study. ANZ J Surg 2007; 77(7): 502-507 doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04138.x pmid:17610680
|
12 |
Bauer JJ, Gelernt IM, Salky BA, Kreel I. Is routine postoperative nasogastric decompression really necessary? Ann Surg 1985; 201(2): 233-236 doi: 10.1097/00000658-198502000-00017 pmid:3970606
|
13 |
Li C, Mei JW, Yan M, Chen MM, Yao XX, Yang QM, Zhou R, Zhu ZG. Nasogastric decompression for radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a prospective randomized controlled study. Dig Surg 2011; 28(3): 167-172 doi: 10.1159/000323744 pmid:21540604
|
14 |
Cheatham ML, Chapman WC, Key SP, Sawyers JL. A meta-analysis of selective versus routine nasogastric decompression after elective laparotomy. Ann Surg 1995; 221(5): 469-476, discussion 476-478 doi: 10.1097/00000658-199505000-00004 pmid:7748028
|
15 |
Wolff BG, Pembeton JH, van Heerden JA, Beart RW Jr, Nivatvongs S, Devine RM, Dozois RR, Ilstrup DM. Elective colon and rectal surgery without nasogastric decompression. A prospective, randomized trial. Ann Surg 1989; 209(6): 670-673, discussion 673-675 doi: 10.1097/00000658-198906000-00003 pmid:2658880
|
16 |
Otchy DP, Wolff BG, van Heerden JA, Ilstrup DM, Weaver AL, Winter LD. Does the avoidance of nasogastric decompression following elective abdominal colorectal surgery affect the incidence of incisional hernia? Results of a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38(6): 604-608 doi: 10.1007/BF02054119 pmid:7774471
|
17 |
Lassen K, Hannemann P, Ljungqvist O, Fearon K, Dejong CH, von Meyenfeldt MF, Hausel J, Nygren J, Andersen J, Revhaug A. Patterns in current perioperative practice: survey of colorectal surgeons in five northern European countries. BMJ 2005; 330(7505): 1420-1421 doi: 10.1136/bmj.38478.568067.AE pmid:15911535
|
18 |
Zhou T, Wu XT, Zhou YJ, Huang X, Fan W, Li YC. Early removing gastrointestinal decompression and early oral feeding improve patients’ rehabilitation after colorectostomy. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(15): 2459-2463 pmid:16688845
|
19 |
Roig JV, García-Fadrique A, García Armengol J, Villalba FL, Bruna M, Sancho C, Puche J. Use of nasogastric tubes and drains after colorectal surgery. Have attitudes changed in the last 10 years? Cir Esp 2008; 83(2): 78-84 (in Spanish) doi: 10.1016/S0009-739X(08)70510-4 pmid:18261413
|
20 |
Ng WQ, Neill J. Evidence for early oral feeding of patients after elective open colorectal surgery: a literature review. J Clin Nurs 2006; 15(6): 696-709 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01389.x pmid:16684165
|
21 |
Silk DB, Gow NM. Postoperative starvation after gastrointestinal surgery. Early feeding is beneficial. BMJ 2001; 323(7316): 761-762 doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7316.761 pmid:11588062
|
22 |
Keele AM, Bray MJ, Emery PW, Duncan HD, Silk DB. Two phase randomised controlled clinical trial of postoperative oral dietary supplements in surgical patients. Gut 1997; 40(3): 393-399 pmid:9135531
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|