Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Medicine

ISSN 2095-0217

ISSN 2095-0225(Online)

CN 11-5983/R

Postal Subscription Code 80-967

2018 Impact Factor: 1.847

Front Med    2012, Vol. 6 Issue (1) : 85-88    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-012-0174-x
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Evaluation of the harmonic scalpel in open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm
Zeyu Wu, Zhe Chen, Lin Peng()
Department of Vascular Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, China
 Download: PDF(97 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The harmonic scalpel is a hemostatic device primarily designed for use in laparoscopic surgery. During the last few years, many surgeons have begun to use the harmonic scalpel in open surgery. Several papers have cited the benefits of the device compared with conventional knot-tying techniques; however, no evidence showing the advantages of using the harmonic scalpel in complicated abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery has been presented. The aim of the present study is to determine the value of the harmonic scalpel in open operation for AAA. A total of 153 patients who underwent open surgery for AAA at the Department of Vascular Surgery of Guangdong General Hospital, China between January 2001 and December 2010, were retrospectively analyzed. Open surgery performed with the harmonic scalpel on 105 patients was compared with open operation using conventional knot-tying techniques on 48 patients. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, total postoperative drainage fluid volumes, hospital stay, and postoperative complications between the two groups were compared. The harmonic scalpel group was associated with a shorter operation time (113.2±23.6 min vs. 232.1±39.2 min, P<0.01) and lower intraoperative blood loss (126.1±96.6 ml vs. 592.1±207.2 ml, P<0.01). Postoperative drainage fluid volumes were greater in the conventional surgery group than in the harmonic scalpel group (702.1±192.8 ml vs. 198.5±97.4 ml, P<0.01). The hospital stay was shorter for the harmonic scalpel group than for the conventional surgery group (10.7±3.3 d vs. 16.5±4.7 d, P<0.05). No differences between the postoperative complications or hospital mortality of the two groups were found. The harmonic scalpel is a safe and minimally invasive tool in open surgery for AAA and is associated with shorter operative time, shorter hospital stay, and lower intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage fluid volumes compared with conventional knot-tying techniques.

Keywords abdominal aortic aneurysm      harmonic scalpel      minimally invasive     
Corresponding Author(s): Peng Lin,Email:pengl@21cn.com   
Issue Date: 05 March 2012
 Cite this article:   
Zeyu Wu,Zhe Chen,Lin Peng. Evaluation of the harmonic scalpel in open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm[J]. Front Med, 2012, 6(1): 85-88.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fmd/EN/10.1007/s11684-012-0174-x
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fmd/EN/Y2012/V6/I1/85
Fig.1  Harmonic scalpel system.
Clinical parametersHarmonic scalpel group (n = 103)Conventional technique group (n = 48)
Sex (male/female)93/1241/7
Age (year)67±1565±14
Operative time (min)113.2±23.6*232.1±39.2
Intraoperative blood loss (ml)126.1±96.6*592.1±207.2
Hospital stay (d)10.7±3.3*16.5±4.7
Postoperative drainage fluid volume (ml)198.5±97.4*702.1±192.8
Tab.1  Clinical parameters between the two groups
Clinical parametersHarmonic scalpel group (n = 103)Conventional technique group (n = 48)
Lower extremity ischemia32
Chylous fistula10
Intra-abdominal bleeding01
Acute respiratory disease syndrome (ARDS)24
Dead11
Tab.2  Complications between the two groups
1 Samancilar O, Cakan A, Cetin Y, Cagirici U, Veral A, Zeytunlu M, Turhan K, Kilic M, Askar FZ. Comparison of the harmonic scalpel and the ultrasonic surgical aspirator in subsegmental lung resections: an experimental study.Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 55(8): 509–511
doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00134-4 pmid:10320284
2 Siperstein AE, Berber E, Engle KL, Duh QY, Clark OH. Laparoscopic posterior adrenalectomy: technical considerations. Arch Surg 2000; 135(8): 967–971
doi: 10.1001/archsurg.135.8.967 pmid:10922260
3 Takao S, Shinchi H, Maemura K, Aikou T. Ultrasonically activated scalpel is an effective tool for cutting the pancreas in biliary-pancreatic surgery: experimental and clinical studies. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2000; 7(1): 58–62
doi: 10.1007/s005340050155 pmid:10982593
4 Inaba H, Kaneko Y, Ohtsuka T, Ezure M, Tanaka K, Ueno K, Takamoto S. Minimal damage during endoscopic latissimus dorsi muscle mobilization with the harmonic scalpel. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69(5): 1399–1401
doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(00)01136-X pmid:10881812
5 Deo SV, Shukla NK. Modified radical mastectomy using harmonic scalpel. J Surg Oncol 2000; 74(3): 204–207
doi: 10.1002/1096-9098(200007)74:3&lt;204::AID-JSO9&gt;3.0.CO;2-U pmid:10951418
6 Foschi D, Cellerino P, Corsi F, Taidelli T, Morandi E, Rizzi A, Trabucchi E. The mechanisms of blood vessel closure in humans by the application of ultrasonic energy. Surg Endosc 2002; 16(5): 814–819
doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9074-x pmid:11997829
7 Samancilar O, Cakan A, Cetin Y, Cagirici U, Veral A, Zeytunlu M, Turhan K, Kilic M, Askar FZ. A prospective, randomized study of comparison of clipless cholecystectomy with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2011; 21(3): 203–208
doi: 10.1097/00019509-199812000-00004 pmid:9864107
8 Kwok SY, Chung CC, Tsui KK, Li MK. A double-blind, randomized trial comparing Ligasure and Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48(2): 344–348
doi: 10.1007/BF02234565 pmid:11357028
9 Siperstein AE, Berber E, Morkoyun E. The use of the harmonic scalpel vs conventional knot tying for vessel ligation in thyroid surgery. Arch Surg 2002; 137(2): 137–142
doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.2.137 pmid:11822946
10 McCarus SD. Physiologic mechanism of the ultrasonically activated scalpel. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1996; 3(4): 601–608
doi: 10.1016/S1074-3804(05)80174-4 pmid:9050696
11 Ching SS, McMahon MJ. Comparison of linear and torsional mode ultrasonic coagulating shears for the sealing of medium- to large-sized arteries. Surg Endosc 2007; 21(7): 1165–1169
doi: 10.1007/s004649900985 pmid:10094743
12 Liem NT, Son TN, Hoan NT. Laparoscopic near-total pancreatectomy for persistent hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia of infancy: report of two cases. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2010; 20(1): 115–117
pmid:7551329
13 Shemen L. Thyroidectomy using the harmonic scalpel: analysis of 105 consecutive cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 127(4): 284–288
doi: 10.1067/mhn.2002.128072 pmid:12402006
14 McNally MM, Agle SC, Williams RF, Pofahl WE. A comparison of two methods of hemostasis in thyroidectomy. Am Surg 2009; 75(11): 1073–1076
pmid:19927508
15 Karvounaris DC, Antonopoulos V, Psarras K, Sakadamis A. Efficacy and safety of ultrasonically activated shears in thyroid surgery. Head Neck 2006; 28(11): 1028–1031
doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00073-7 pmid:9645779
16 Meurisse M, Defechereux T, Maweja S, Degauque C, Vandelaer M, Hamoir E. Evaluation of the Ultracision? ultrasonic dissector in thyroid surgery. Prospective randomized study. Ann Chir 2000; 125(5): 468–472 (in French)
doi: 10.1016/S0003-3944(00)00223-6 pmid:10925490
[1] Zongming Zhang, Zhuo Liu, Limin Liu, Mengmeng Song, Chong Zhang, Hongwei Yu, Baijiang Wan, Mingwen Zhu, Zixu Liu, Hai Deng, Haiming Yuan, Haiyan Yang, Wenping Wei, Yue Zhao. Strategies of minimally invasive treatment for intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct stones[J]. Front. Med., 2017, 11(4): 576-589.
[2] Taiping Zhang, Xiao Du, Yupei Zhao. Laparoscopic surgery for pancreatic lesions: current status and future[J]. Front Med, 2011, 5(3): 277-282.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed