|
|
Contemporary coronary artery bypass grafting |
David P. Taggart() |
Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK |
|
|
Abstract Current evidence clearly demonstrates that coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains the “gold standard” treatment for most patients with multivessel and left main stem disease. This article summarizes the relevant evidence basis demonstrating that CABG, in comparison to stenting, reduces mortality and subsequent myocardial infarction and the need for repeat revascularization. The article also describes the evidence basis to support the use of more arterial grafts during CABG and the current role of off-pump CABG.
|
Keywords
coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)
coronary artery disease
left main
arterial grafts
internal mammary artery
off-pump CABG
|
Issue Date: 18 December 2014
|
|
1 |
Taggart DP, Thomas B. Ferguson Lecture. Coronary artery bypass grafting is still the best treatment for multivessel and left main disease, but patients need to know. Ann Thorac Surg2006; 82(6): 1966-1975
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.06.035
pmid: 17126093
|
2 |
Weintraub WS, Grau-Sepulveda MV, Weiss JM, O’Brien SM, Peterson ED, Kolm P, Zhang Z, Klein LW, Shaw RE, McKay C, Ritzenthaler LL, Popma JJ, Messenger JC, Shahian DM, Grover FL, Mayer JE, Shewan CM, Garratt KN, Moussa ID, Dangas GD, Edwards FH. Comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies. N Engl J Med2012; 366(16): 1467-1476
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1110717
pmid: 22452338
|
3 |
Head SJ, Davierwala PM, Serruys PW, Redwood SR, Colombo A, Mack MJ, Morice MC, Holmes DR Jr, Feldman TE, St?hle E, Underwood P, Dawkins KD, Kappetein AP, Mohr FW. Coronary artery bypass grafting vs. percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with three-vessel disease: final five-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial. Eur Heart J2014<month>May</month><day>21</day>. [Epub ahead of print]
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu213
pmid: 24849105
|
4 |
Morice MC, Serruys PW, Kappetein AP, Feldman TE, St?hle E, Colombo A, Mack MJ, Holmes DR, Choi JW, Ruzyllo W, Religa G, Huang J, Roy K, Dawkins KD, Mohr F. Five-year outcomes in patients with left main disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting in the SYNTAX Trial. Circulation2014; 129(23): 2388-2394
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006689
pmid: 24700706
|
5 |
Sipahi I, Akay MH, Dagdelen S, Blitz A, Alhan C. Coronary artery bypass grafting vs percutaneous coronary intervention and long-term mortality and morbidity in multivessel disease: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of the arterial grafting and stenting era. JAMA Intern Med2014; 174(2): 223-230
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12844
pmid: 24296767
|
6 |
Hakeem A, Garg N, Bhatti S, Rajpurohit N, Ahmed Z, Uretsky BF. Effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents compared with bypass surgery in diabetics with multivessel coronary disease: comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical data. J Am Heart Assoc2013; 2(4): e000354
https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.113.000354
pmid: 23926119
|
7 |
Verma S, Farkouh ME, Yanagawa B, Fitchett DH, Ahsan MR, Ruel M, Sud S, Gupta M, Singh S, Gupta N, Cheema AN, Leiter LA, Fedak PW, Teoh H, Latter DA, Fuster V, Friedrich JO. Comparison of coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol2013; 1(4): 317-328
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70089-5
pmid: 24622417
|
8 |
Park SJ, Kim YH, Park DW, Yun SC, Ahn JM, Song HG, Lee JY, Kim WJ, Kang SJ, Lee SW, Lee CW, Park SW, Chung CH, Lee JW, Lim DS, Rha SW, Lee SG, Gwon HC, Kim HS, Chae IH, Jang Y, Jeong MH, Tahk SJ, Seung KB. Randomized trial of stents versus bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med2011; 364(18): 1718-1727
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1100452
pmid: 21463149
|
9 |
Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, Stewart RW, Goormastic M, Williams GW, Golding LA, Gill CC, Taylor PC, Sheldon WC, Proudfit WL. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med1986; 314(1): 1-6
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198601023140101
pmid: 3484393
|
10 |
Lüscher TF, Diederich D, Siebenmann R, Lehmann K, Stulz P, von Segesser L, Yang ZH, Turina M, Gr?del E, Weber E, .Difference between endothelium-dependent relaxation in arterial and in venous coronary bypass grafts. N Engl J Med1988; 319(8): 462-467
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198808253190802
pmid: 3136329
|
11 |
Taggart DP, Altman DG, Gray AM, Lees B, Nugara F, Yu LM, Campbell H, Flather M; ART Investigators.. Randomized trial to compare bilateral vs. single internal mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 1-year results of the Arterial Revascularisation Trial (ART). Eur Heart J2010; 31(20): 2470-2481
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq318
pmid: 20805116
|
12 |
Taggart DP, D’Amico R, Altman DG. Effect of arterial revascularisation on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries. Lancet2001; 358(9285): 870-875
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06069-X
pmid: 11567701
|
13 |
Yi G, Shine B, Rehman SM, Altman DG, Taggart DP. Effect of bilateral internal mammary artery grafts on long-term survival: a meta-analysis approach. Circulation2014; 130(7): 539-545
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004255
pmid: 24916209
|
14 |
Weiss AJ, Zhao S, Tian DH, Taggart DP, Yan TD. A meta-analysis comparing bilateral internal mammary artery with left internal mammary artery for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Cardiothorac Surg2013; 2(4): 390-400
pmid: 23977614
|
15 |
Rehman SM, Yi G, Taggart DP. The radial artery: current concepts on its use in coronary artery revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg2013; 96(5): 1900-1909
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.06.083
pmid: 24090580
|
16 |
Tranbaugh RF, Dimitrova KR, Friedmann P, Geller CM, Harris LJ, Stelzer P, Cohen BM, Ko W, DeCastro H, Lucido D, Hoffman DM. Coronary artery bypass grafting using the radial artery: clinical outcomes, patency, and need for reintervention. Circulation2012; 126(11 Suppl 1): S170-S175
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.083048
pmid: 22965979
|
17 |
M?ller CH, Penninga L, Wetterslev J, Steinbrüchel DA, Gluud C. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for ischaemic heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2012; 3: CD007224
pmid: 22419321
|
18 |
Lamy A, Devereaux PJ, Prabhakaran D, Taggart DP, Hu S, Paolasso E, Straka Z, Piegas LS, Akar AR, Jain AR, Noiseux N, Padmanabhan C, Bahamondes JC, Novick RJ, Vaijyanath P, Reddy SK, Tao L, Olavegogeascoechea PA, Airan B, Sulling TA, Whitlock RP, Ou Y, Pogue J, Chrolavicius S, Yusuf S; CORONARY Investigators. Effects of off-pump and on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting at 1 year. N Engl J Med2013; 368(13): 1179-1188
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1301228
pmid: 23477676
|
19 |
Diegeler A, B?rgermann J, Kappert U, Breuer M, B?ning A, Ursulescu A, Rastan A, Holzhey D, Treede H, Rie? FC, Veeckmann P, Asfoor A, Reents W, Zacher M, Hilker M; GOPCABE Study Group. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting in elderly patients. N Engl J Med2013; 368(13): 1189-1198
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1211666
pmid: 23477657
|
20 |
Kuss O, von Salviati B, B?rgermann J. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score analyses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2010; 140(4): 829-835, e1-e13
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.12.022
pmid: 20167334
|
21 |
Polomsky M, He X, O’Brien SM, Puskas JD. Outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: Impact of preoperative risk. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2013; 145(5): 1193-1198
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.02.002
pmid: 23597624
|
22 |
B?rgermann J, Hakim K, Renner A, Parsa A, Aboud A, Becker T, Masshoff M, Zittermann A, Gummert JF, Kuss O. Clampless off-pump versus conventional coronary artery revascularization: a propensity score analysis of 788 patients. Circulation2012; 126(11 Suppl 1): S176-S182
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.084285
pmid: 22965980
|
23 |
Misfeld M, Brereton RJ, Sweetman EA, Doig GS. Neurologic complications after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with and without aortic manipulation: meta-analysis of 11,398 cases from 8 studies. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2011; 142(2): e11-e17
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.11.034
pmid: 21281950
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|