Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Medicine

ISSN 2095-0217

ISSN 2095-0225(Online)

CN 11-5983/R

Postal Subscription Code 80-967

2018 Impact Factor: 1.847

Front Med Chin    2010, Vol. 4 Issue (3) : 303-307    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-010-0090-x
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Difference between 2 h and 3 h 75 g glucose tolerance test in the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM): Results from a national survey on prevalence of GDM
Xue-Lian GAO1, Yu-Mei WEI1, Hui-Xia YANG1(), Xian-Ming XU2, Ling FAN3, Jing HE4, Ning LIU5, San-Cun ZHAO6, Ya-Li HU7, Zi YANG8, Yun-Ping ZHANG9, Xing-Hui LIU10, Xu CHEN11, Jian-Ping ZHANG12, Wen-Li GOU13, Mei XIAO14, Hai-Rong WU15, Mei-Hua ZHANG16
1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China; 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Affiliated People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200080, China; 3. Department of Obstetrics, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100026, China; 4. Women’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310006, China; 5. Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Urumchi, Urumchi 830000, China; 6. Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Shanxi, Xi’an 710003, China; 7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China; 8. Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; 9. Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Haidian District, Beijing 100080, China; 10. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; 11. Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tianjin 300052, China; 12. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China; 13. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Medical School of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Shanxi 710061, China; 14. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hubei Maternal & Child Health Hospital, Wuhan 430100, China; 15. The Central Hospital of Aviation Industry of China, Beijing 100012, China; 16. Taiyuan Maternal and Infant Health Care Hospital of Shanxi Province, Taiyuan 030012, China
 Download: PDF(87 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The possibility of the 2 h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) as an alternative to the 3 h OGTT was investigated based on data from a national survey on pregnancy-associated diabetes. Data were retrieved from 4179 pregnant women who had OGTT performed after an abnormal 50 g glucose challenge test (GCT). All of the 4 glucose levels during their OGTT were collected and analyzed. According to American Diabetes Association (ADA) gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnostic criteria, among the 4179 pregnant women who required OGTT, 3429 (82.1%) were normal and 750 (17.9%) were diagnosed as GDM. If the 3rd h glucose levels were omitted from OGTT, 79 cases of GDM (10.5%) would be overlooked. No trend was shown where women with more risk factors were more likely to be overlooked if the 3rd h test was omitted (χ2 for trend= 0.038, P>0.05). No significant differences were found in the rate of cesarean section (CS), preterm births or macrosomia between the 79 cases and those with normal OGTT results and in the gestational weeks when OGTT was performed. It shows that in order to diagnose one woman with GDM, another 52 pregnant women would have an innocent 3rd h glucose test. Omission of the 3rd h glucose test in OGTT might be reasonable due to its convenience, better compliance and a small number of possibly miss-diagnosed cases, and their pregnancy outcomes have no significant difference from those of normal pregnant women.

Keywords diabetes      gestational      oral glucose tolerance test     
Corresponding Author(s): YANG Hui-Xia,Email:yanghuixia@bjmu.edu.cn   
Issue Date: 05 September 2010
 Cite this article:   
Xue-Lian GAO,Yu-Mei WEI,Hui-Xia YANG, et al. Difference between 2 h and 3 h 75 g glucose tolerance test in the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM): Results from a national survey on prevalence of GDM[J]. Front Med Chin, 2010, 4(3): 303-307.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fmd/EN/10.1007/s11684-010-0090-x
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fmd/EN/Y2010/V4/I3/303
basic informationall OGTT performednormal OGTTpossibly miss-diagnosed cases
mean age/yr*31.0±4.2 (n = 4179)29.8±3.8 (n = 2597)31.0±4.1 (n = 79)
prepregnant BMI*22.0±6.7 (n = 4179)21.1±2.8 (n = 2597)21.3±2.8 (n = 79)
delivery weeks/wk*39.1±1.6 (n = 2857)39.2±1.6 (n = 1733)39.0±1.4 (n = 56)
birth weight/g*3412.0±584.2 (n = 2857)3415.0±957.6 (n = 1733)3233.5±496.1 (n = 56)
Tab.1  Basic information of women who had OGTT performed
total numberno risk factor1 risk factor2 risk factors3 risk factors≥4 risk factors
n (%)n (%)n (%)n (%)n (%)
miss-diagnosed cases7919 (24.1)28 (35.4)23 (29.1)8 (10.1)1 (1.3)
all who had OGTT41791051 (25.1)1612 (38.6)993 (23.8)377 (9.0)146 (3.5)
χ20.050.321.220.12
P>0.05>0.05>0.05>0.05>0.05
Tab.2  Risk factors analysis of the possibly miss-diagnosed cases
glucose level /mmol·L-1fasting1st h (≥10.0 mmol/L)2nd h (≥8.6 mmol/L)miss-diagnosed cases (3rd h value≥7.8 mmol/L)
n (%)n (%)n (%)n (%)
13 (≥13,<14.0)1 (2.17)
12–1 (2.17)
11–9 (39.1)2 (4.35)2 (2.5)
10–14 (60.9)3 (6.52)3 (3.8)
9–26 (56.52)14 (17.7)
8–13 (28.26)40 (50.6)
7–20 (25.3)
6–1 (10.0)
5.3–9 (90.0)
total number10 (100.0)23 (100.0)46 (100.0)79 (100.0)
Tab.3  Distribution of the abnormal glucose values in OGTT in 79 miss-diagnosed cases
possibly miss-diagnosed cases (n=56)*normal OGTT cases (n=1733)*χ2P value
number%number%
cesarean section1628.668839.72.81>0.05
preterm birth47.118510.70.72>0.05
macrosomia 47.11136.50.03>0.05
Tab.4  Comparison of pregnancy outcomes between those possibly miss-diagnosed cases and women with normal OGTT
total number≥28 weeks24–28 weeks<24 weeks
n (%)n (%)n (%)
misdiagnosed cases7953 (67.1)24 (30.4)2 (2.5)
all who had OGTT41792614 (62.6)1280 (30.6)285 (6.8)
χ20.680.02.27
P value>0.05>0.05>0.05
Tab.5  The gestational weeks when OGTT was performed
1 Metzger B E, Coustan D R. Summary and recommendations of the fourth international workshop-conference on gestational diabetes mellitus. The Organizing Committee. Diabetes Care , 1998, 21(Suppl 2): B161-B167
2 Gao X L, Yang H X. Current situation of the studies on pregnancy associated with diabetes in China. Zhongguo Quan Ke Yi Xue , 2008, 11(4A): 547-550 (in Chinese)
3 Yang H, Wei Y, Gao X, Xu X, Fan L, He J, Hu Y, Liu X, Chen X, Yang Z, Zhang C; China National GDM Survey Working Group. Risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus in Chinese women: a prospective study of 16,286 pregnant women in China. Diabet Med , 2009, 26(11): 1099-1104
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02845.x
4 Wei Y M, Yang H X, Gao X L. Investigation into the prevalence and suitable diagnostic criteria of gestational diabetes mellitus in China. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi , 2008, 43(9): 647-650 (in Chinese)
5 Rumbold A R, Crowther C A. Guideline use for gestational diabetes mellitus and current screening, diagnostic and management practices in Australian hospitals. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol , 2001, 41(1): 86-90
doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2001.tb01301.x
6 Cunningham F G, Gant N F, Leveno K J, Gilstrap L C III, Hauth J C, Wenstrom K D. Williams Obstetrics. 23rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005, 127-128
7 Xie Y, Xu X M, Li S D. Feasibility of diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus by oral glucose tolerance test without the third-hour plasma glucose level. Zhonghua Wei Chan Yi Xue Za Zhi , 2005, 8(2): 89-91 (in Chinese)
8 Jakobi P, Solt I, Weissman A. A 2 hour versus the 3 hour 100 g glucose tolerance test for diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus. J Perinat Med , 2004, 32(4): 320-322
doi: 10.1515/JPM.2004.059
9 Atilano L C, Lee-Parritz A, Lieberman E, Cohen A P, Barbieri R L. Alternative methods of diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol , 1999, 181(5 Pt 1): 1158-1161
doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70100-6
10 Hod M, Jovanovic L, Di Renzo G C. Textbook of Diabetes and Pregnancy. London: Martin Dunitz , 2003, 32-64
11 Yang H X, Gao X L, Dong Y, Shi C Y. Analysis of oral glucose tolerance test in pregnant women with abnormal glucose metabolism. Chin Med J (Engl) , 2005, 118(12): 995-999
12 Qin S W, Cheng N H, Liu J T, Shan Y, Bian X M, Xiang H D. 100 g oral glucose tolerance test in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus. Shengzhi Yi Xue Za Zhi , 2007, 16(1): 1-3 (in Chinese)
13 American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2010. Diabetes Care , 2010, 33(Suppl 1): S11-S61
doi: 10.2337/dc10-S011
[1] Hui Wang, Yang Zhang, Zhujun Shen, Ligang Fang, Zhenyu Liu, Shuyang Zhang. Prognostic value of fasting glucose on the risk of heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction in non-diabetic patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Front. Med., 2021, 15(1): 70-78.
[2] Di Cheng, Chunyan Hu, Rui Du, Hongyan Qi, Lin Lin, Xueyan Wu, Lina Ma, Kui Peng, Mian Li, Min Xu, Yu Xu, Yufang Bi, Weiqing Wang, Yuhong Chen, Jieli Lu. Serum uric acid and risk of incident diabetes in middle-aged and elderly Chinese adults: prospective cohort study[J]. Front. Med., 2020, 14(6): 802-810.
[3] Huiwen Ren, Can Wu, Ying Shao, Shuang Liu, Yang Zhou, Qiuyue Wang. Correlation between serum miR-154-5p and urinary albumin excretion rates in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional cohort study[J]. Front. Med., 2020, 14(5): 642-650.
[4] Pengju Zhang, Tao Li, Xingyun Wu, Edouard C. Nice, Canhua Huang, Yuanyuan Zhang. Oxidative stress and diabetes: antioxidative strategies[J]. Front. Med., 2020, 14(5): 583-600.
[5] Ning Jiang, Yao Li, Ting Shu, Jing Wang. Cytokines and inflammation in adipogenesis: an updated review[J]. Front. Med., 2019, 13(3): 314-329.
[6] Xiaoqing Li, Xinxin Li, Genbei Wang, Yan Xu, Yuanyuan Wang, Ruijia Hao, Xiaohui Ma. Xiao Ke Qing improves glycometabolism and ameliorates insulin resistance by regulating the PI3K/Akt pathway in KKAy mice[J]. Front. Med., 2018, 12(6): 688-696.
[7] Liping Xuan, Zhiyun Zhao, Xu Jia, Yanan Hou, Tiange Wang, Mian Li, Jieli Lu, Yu Xu, Yuhong Chen, Lu Qi, Weiqing Wang, Yufang Bi, Min Xu. Type 2 diabetes is causally associated with depression: a Mendelian randomization analysis[J]. Front. Med., 2018, 12(6): 678-687.
[8] Jiemin Pan, Weiping Jia. Early-onset diabetes: an epidemic in China[J]. Front. Med., 2018, 12(6): 624-633.
[9] Cynthia Rajani, Wei Jia. Bile acids and their effects on diabetes[J]. Front. Med., 2018, 12(6): 608-623.
[10] Meng Dong, Jun Lin, Wonchung Lim, Wanzhu Jin, Hyuek Jong Lee. Role of brown adipose tissue in metabolic syndrome, aging, and cancer cachexia[J]. Front. Med., 2018, 12(2): 130-138.
[11] Chao Chen, Chang Wang, Chun Hu, Yachun Han, Li Zhao, Xuejing Zhu, Li Xiao, Lin Sun. Normoalbuminuric diabetic kidney disease[J]. Front. Med., 2017, 11(3): 310-318.
[12] Palka Kaur Khanuja,Satish Chander Narula,Rajesh Rajput,Rajinder Kumar Sharma,Shikha Tewari. Association of periodontal disease with glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes in Indian population[J]. Front. Med., 2017, 11(1): 110-119.
[13] Huiqin Zhong,Ya Shao,Ling Fan,Tangshen Zhong,Lu Ren,Yan Wang. Perceived resource support for chronic illnesses among diabetics in north-western China[J]. Front. Med., 2016, 10(2): 219-227.
[14] Juan Zheng,Shih-Lung Woo,Xiang Hu,Rachel Botchlett,Lulu Chen,Yuqing Huo,Chaodong Wu. Metformin and metabolic diseases: a focus on hepatic aspects[J]. Front. Med., 2015, 9(2): 173-186.
[15] Jie Zheng,Yuzhen Gao,Yuejuan Jing,Xiaoshuang Zhou,Yuanyuan Shi,Yanhong Li,Lihua Wang,Ruiying Wang,Maolian Li,Chuanshi Xiao,Yafeng Li,Rongshan Li. Gender differences in the relationship between plasma lipids and fasting plasma glucose in non-diabetic urban Chinese population: a cross-section study[J]. Front. Med., 2014, 8(4): 477-483.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed