Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Medicine

ISSN 2095-0217

ISSN 2095-0225(Online)

CN 11-5983/R

Postal Subscription Code 80-967

2018 Impact Factor: 1.847

Front Med    2012, Vol. 6 Issue (4) : 421-427    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-012-0223-5
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Assessment of liver volume variation to evaluate liver function
Cong Tong1, Xinsen Xu1, Chang Liu1(), Tianzheng Zhang2, Kai Qu1
1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China; 2. Department of Surgery, Shaanxi Xianyang 215 Hospital, Xianyang 712000, China
 Download: PDF(201 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

In order to assess the value of liver volumetry in cirrhosis and acute liver failure (ALF) patients, we explored the correlation between hepatic volume and severity of the hepatic diseases. The clinical data of 48 cirrhosis patients with 60 normal controls and 39 ALF patients were collected. Computed tomography-derived liver volume (CTLV) and body surface area (BSA) of normal controls were calculated to get a regression formula for standard liver volume (SLV) and BSA. Then CTLV and SLV of all patients were calculated and grouped by Child-Turcotte-Pugh classification for cirrhosis patients and assigned according to prognosis of ALF patients for further comparison. It turned out that the mean liver volume of the control group was 1 058±337 cm3. SLV was correlated with BSA according to the regression formula. The hepatic volume of cirrhosis patients in Child A, B level was not reduced, but in Child C level it was significantly reduced with the lowest liver volume index (CTLV/SLV). Likewise, in the death group of ALF patients, the volume index was significantly lower than that of the survival group. Based on volumetric study, we proposed an ROC (receiver operating characteristic) analysis to predict the prognosis of ALF patients that CTLV/SLV<83.9% indicates a poor prognosis. In conclusion, the CTLV/SLV ratio, which reflects liver volume variations, correlates well with the liver function and progression of cirrhosis and ALF. It is also a very useful marker for predicting the prognosis of ALF.

Keywords liver volume variation      cirrhosis      acute liver failure (ALF)     
Corresponding Author(s): Liu Chang,Email:liuchangdoctor@163.com   
Issue Date: 05 December 2012
 Cite this article:   
Cong Tong,Xinsen Xu,Chang Liu, et al. Assessment of liver volume variation to evaluate liver function[J]. Front Med, 2012, 6(4): 421-427.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fmd/EN/10.1007/s11684-012-0223-5
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fmd/EN/Y2012/V6/I4/421
Fig.1  Volumetric analysis of the liver. (A) To outline the edge of the liver on each slice of the CT films with a cursorB) Reconstruction of the liver by adding the area of each slice from the most superior part to the most inferior part.
DiagnosisGenderAge (year)Height (cm)Weight (kg)
MaleFemale
Normal controls402052±13167.0±6.458.2±10.9
CirrhosisChild A7355±16168.8±6.963.9±8.7
Child B151149±13168.0±7.559.8±10.5
Child C9347±15167.0±4.659.0±11.8
ALFDeath group11536±11170.1±6.963.6±9.3
Survival group20343±15168.5±8.963.2±9.3
Tab.1  Baseline characteristics of the patients
Child-Turcotte-Pugh classificationNo. of patientsSLV (cm3)CTLV (cm3)Volume indexa
Child A101 231±1201 156±2580.94±0.18
Child B261 189±1401 054±4300.87±0.31
Child C121 174±129814±169 b0.71±0.20b
Tab.2  Correlation between cirrhotic liver volume index and liver function
Fig.2  Difference of the volume index between different cirrhosis Child classes.
GroupsPrognosisNo. of patientsSLV (cm3)CTLV (cm3)Volume indexa
ASurvival231 227±1271 164±1370.95±0.11
BDeath161 219±116981±1100.81±0.10 b
Tab.3  Correlation between ALF liver volume index and liver function
Fig.3  Difference of the volume index between different ALF prognosis.
Fig.4  ROC analysis of the ALF volume index.
1 Saygili OB, Tarhan NC, Yildirim T, Serin E, Ozer B, Agildere AM. Value of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for assessing severity of liver cirrhosis secondary to viral hepatitis. Eur J Radiol 2005; 54(3): 400–407
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.08.001 pmid:15899343
2 Sekiyama K, Yoshiba M, Inoue K, Sugata F. Prognostic value of hepatic volumetry in fulminant hepatic failure. Dig Dis Sci 1994; 39(2): 240–244
doi: 10.1007/BF02090192 pmid:8313804
3 Vauthey JN, Abdalla EK, Doherty DA, Gertsch P, Fenstermacher MJ, Loyer EM, Lerut J, Materne R, Wang X, Encarnacion A, Herron D, Mathey C, Ferrari G, Charnsangavej C, Do KA, Denys A. Body surface area and body weight predict total liver volume in Western adults. Liver Transpl 2002; 8(3): 233–240
doi: 10.1053/jlts.2002.31654 pmid:11910568
4 Chinese Medical Association. Viral Hepatitis Prevention and Treatment Scheme in China. Chin J Hepatol (Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi) 2000; 8(6): 324–329 (in Chinese)
5 Heymsfield SB, Fulenwider T, Nordlinger B, Barlow R, Sones P, Kutner M. Accurate measurement of liver, kidney, and spleen volume and mass by computerized axial tomography. Ann Intern Med 1979; 90(2): 185–187
pmid:443650
6 Kardel T, Holm HH, Rasmussen SN, Mortensen T. Ultrasonic determination of liver and spleem volumes. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1971; 27(2): 123–128
doi: 10.3109/00365517109080197 pmid:5572884
7 Kalkmann J, Forsting M, Stattaus J. Liver volume variations as a parameter to assess therapy response in advanced metastatic liver disease. Onkologie 2011; 34(1-2): 30–34
doi: 10.1159/000323373 pmid:21346382
8 Dubus L, Gayet M, Zappa M, Abaleo L, De Cooman A, Orieux G, Vilgrain V. Comparison of semi-automated and manual methods to measure the volume of liver tumours on MDCT images. Eur Radiol 2011; 21(5): 996–1003
doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-2013-2 pmid:21132500
9 Müller SA, Bl?uer K, Kremer M, Thorn M, Mehrabi A, Meinzer HP, Hinz U, Metzger J, Büchler MW, Schmied BM. Exact CT-based liver volume calculation including nonmetabolic liver tissue in three-dimensional liver reconstruction. J Surg Res 2010; 160(2): 236–243
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.04.050 pmid:19765736
10 Zhou XP, Lu T, Wei YG, Chen XZ. Liver volume variation in patients with virus-induced cirrhosis: findings on MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189(3): W153-159
doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2181 pmid:17715084
11 Du WB, Pan XP, Li LJ. Prognostic models for acute liver failure. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2010; 9(2): 122–128
pmid:20382580
12 Li YM, Lv F, Xu X, Ji H, Gao WT, Lei TJ, Ren GB, Bai ZL, Li Q. Evaluation of liver functional reserve by combining D-sorbitol clearance rate and CT measured liver volume. World J Gastroenterol 2003; 9(9): 2092–2095
pmid:12970913
13 Tu R, Xia LP, Yu AL, Wu L. Assessment of hepatic functional reserve by cirrhosis grading and liver volume measurement using CT. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(29): 3956–3961
pmid:17663509
14 Joyeux H, Berticelli J, Chemouny S, Masson B, Borianne P. Semi-automatic measurements of hepatic lobes. Application to study of liver volumes. Analysis of 50 computed tomography of normal liver. Ann Chir 2003; 128(4): 251–255 (in French)
doi: 10.1016/S0003-3944(03)00066-X pmid:12853022
15 Dodd GD 3rd, Baron RL, Oliver JH 3rd, Federle MP. Spectrum of imaging findings of the liver in end-stage cirrhosis: Part II, focal abnormalities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173(5): 1185–1192
pmid:10541086
16 Wang JH, Changchien CS, Hung CH, Eng HL, Tung WC, Kee KM, Chen CH, Hu TH, Lee CM, Lu SN. FibroScan and ultrasonography in the prediction of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic viral hepatitis. J Gastroenterol 2009; 44(5): 439–446
doi: 10.1007/s00535-009-0017-y pmid:19308312
17 Shim JH, Yu JS, Chung JJ, Kim JH, Kim KW. Segmental difference of the hepatic fibrosis from chronic viral hepatitis due to hepatitis B versus C virus infection: comparison using dual contrast material-enhanced MRI. Korean J Radiol 2011; 12(4): 431–438
doi: 10.3348/kjr.2011.12.4.431 pmid:21852903
18 Krinsky GA, Lee VS, Theise ND. Focal lesions in the cirrhotic liver: high resolution ex vivo MRI with pathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000; 24(2): 189–196
doi: 10.1097/00004728-200003000-00002 pmid:10752877
19 Shakil AO, Jones BC, Lee RG, Federle MP, Fung JJ, Rakela J. Prognostic value of abdominal CT scanning and hepatic histopathology in patients with acute liver failure. Dig Dis Sci 2000; 45(2): 334–339
doi: 10.1023/A:1005416727424 pmid:10711447
[1] Tung Huynh, Ke-Qin Hu. Direct acting antiviral-induced dynamic reduction of serum α fetoprotein in hepatitis C patients without hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Front. Med., 2019, 13(6): 658-666.
[2] Ruoxi Zhang, Jing Chen, Diangang Liu, Yu Wang. Urotensin II receptor antagonist reduces hepatic resistance and portal pressure through enhanced eNOS-dependent HSC vasodilatation in CCl4-induced cirrhotic rats[J]. Front. Med., 2019, 13(3): 398-408.
[3] Xuefu Wang, Zhigang Tian. γδ T cells in liver diseases[J]. Front. Med., 2018, 12(3): 262-268.
[4] James S. Park,Calvin Pan. Current recommendations of managing HBV infection in preconception or pregnancy[J]. Front. Med., 2014, 8(2): 158-165.
[5] Jiangyi Zhu, Yongquan Shi, Xinmin Zhou, Zengshan Li, Xiaofeng Huang, Zheyi Han, Jianhong Wang, Ruian Wang, Jie Ding, Kaichun Wu, Ying Han, Daiming Fan. Observation on therapeutic efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid in Chinese patients with primary biliary cirrhosis: a 2-year follow-up study[J]. Front Med, 2013, 7(2): 255-263.
[6] Lili LIU MM , Jiyao WANG MD , Weimin SHE MM , . Correlation between viral load and liver cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis B patients[J]. Front. Med., 2009, 3(3): 271-276.
[7] Ling YANG, Rui ZHU, Qingjing ZHU, Dan DAN, Jin YE, Keshu XU, Xiaohua HOU. Influence of β-elemene on the secretion of angiotensin II and expression of AT1R in hepatic stellate cells[J]. Front Med Chin, 2009, 3(1): 36-40.
[8] CHU Deyong, LI Conglei, SHEN Jilong, WU Qiang. Paeoniflorin prevents hepatic fibrosis of by inhibiting TGF-&#946;1 production from macrophages in mice[J]. Front. Med., 2008, 2(2): 154-165.
[9] LIU Jie, WANG Jiyao, WEI Liming, LU Ye, Jin Hong. Effects of Decoction on plasma proteome in cirrhosis: preliminary experimental study with rats[J]. Front. Med., 2008, 2(1): 39-44.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed