|
|
Long-term remodeling of anterior alveolar bone
from treatment to retention |
Yan LIU MD1,Jiuhui JIANG MD1,Tianmin XU MD1,Haiping ZHANG MD2, |
1.Department of Orthodontics,
School and Hospital of Stomatology, Peking University, Beijing 100081,
China; 2.Department of Orthodontics,
School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050,
China; |
|
|
Abstract Bone remodeling in orthodontic treatment has been one of the most concerned issues. The purpose of this study was to characterize the changes in bone remodeling on both labial and lingual aspects of the anterior teeth during treatment and retention. Data of 55 extraction cases (41 females and 14 males) were collected at pretreatment, post-treatment, and follow-up stages. Bone thickness on both labial and lingual aspects of the upper and lower incisors were measured at the level of the center of resistance (UC and LC) and that of 3mm apical to the upper and lower incisors’ center of resistance (UAC and LAC). For LC, with the significant lingual movement of point LIR (center of resistance of lower incisor; P<0.001), no statistically significant changes in alveolar width on the labial aspect were detected, whereas the reduction of lingual alveolar width was statistically significant (P<0.001). In retention, no significant movement of point LIR appeared to occur, while an increase in alveolar width on the lingual aspect was found at this stage. For LAC, the changes in alveolar width as well as the displacement of point LIA (apex of lower incisor) were similar to those of LC. On the maxilla, with the control lingual tipping movement of upper incisor, most of the anterior alveolar changes surrounding the upper incisor were analogous to those of lower incisor. But differently, during treatment, labial bone thickness was increased significantly as the upper incisor moved lingually, and in retention, no statistically significant changes were found on both labial and lingual bone thickness as the upper incisor labially proclined. It was concluded that, with lingual movement of the incisors, bone apposition on the lingual aspect may lag behind the incisor movement. In retention, the lower incisors are in a stable position, with sequential bone apposition being presented on the lingual aspect. However, the upper incisors turn out to be labially relapsed along with the lingual bone resorption and labial bone apposition occurring simultaneously.
|
Keywords
alveolus
remodeling
orthodontics
extraction
|
Issue Date: 05 December 2009
|
|
|
Melsen B. Biologicalreaction of alveolar bone to orthodontic tooth movement. Angle Orthod, 1999, 69(2): 151–158
|
|
Melsen B. Tissuereaction to orthodontic tooth movement—a new paradigm. Eur J Orthod, 2001, 23(6): 671–681
doi: 10.1093/ejo/23.6.671
|
|
Reitan K, Kvam E. Comparative behavior of humanand animal tissue during experimental tooth movement. Angle Orthod, 1971, 41(1): 1–14
|
|
Reitan K. Effectsof force magnitude and direction of tooth movement on different alveolarbone types. Angle Orthod, 1964, 34(4): 244–255
|
|
Vardimon A D, Oren E, Ben-Bassat Y. Cortical bone remodeling/tooth movement ratio duringmaxillary incisor retraction with tip versus torque movements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1998, 114(5): 520–529
doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70172-6
|
|
De Angelis V. Observationson the response of alveolar bone to orthodontic force. Am J Orthod, 1970, 58(3): 284–294
doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(70)90092-8
|
|
Wainwright W M. Faciolingual tooth movement: its influence on the root and corticalplate. Am J Orthod, 1973, 64(3): 278–302
doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(73)90021-3
|
|
Ten Hoeve A, Mulie R M. The effect of antero-posteroincisor repositioning on the palatal cortex as studied with laminagraph. J Clin Orthod, 1976, 10(11): 804–822
|
|
Wehrbein H, Fuhrmann R A W, Diedrich P R. Human histologic tissue response after long-term orthodontictooth movement. Am J Orthod DentofacialOrthop, 1995, 107(4): 360–371
doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70088-9
|
|
Wehrbein H, Bauer W, Diedrich P R. Mandibular incisors, alveolar bone, and symphysis afterorthodontic tooth movement. A retrospectivestudy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1996, 110(3): 239–246
doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(96)80006-0
|
|
Handelman C S. The anterior alveolus: its importance in limiting orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod, 1996, 66(2): 95–110
|
|
Proffit W R. Contemporary Orthodontics. 3rd ed. St.Louis: Mosby, Inc., 1999, 674–709
|
|
Lupi J E, Handelman C S, Sadowsky C. Prevalence and severity of apical root resorption andalveolar bone loss in orthodontically treated adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1996, 109(1): 28–37
doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70160-9
|
|
Edwards J G. Astudy of the anterior portion of the palate as it relates to orthodontictherapy. Am J Orthod, 1976, 69(3): 249–273
doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(76)90075-0
|
|
Xu T M, Liu Y, Jiang J H, Zhang H P. Cephalometricstudy of alveolar remodeling during incisor retraction. Shi Yong Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi, 2004, 20(4): 431–433 (in Chinese)
|
|
Otis L L, Hong J S, Tuncay O C. Bone structure effect on root resorption. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2004, 7(3): 165–177
doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2004.00282.x
|
|
Wonglamsam P, Manosudprasit M, Godfrey K. Facio-lingual width of the alveolar base. Aust Orthod J, 2003, 19(1): 1–11
|
|
Wehrbein H, Fuhrmann R A, Diedrich P R. Periodontal conditions after facial root tipping andpalatal root torque of incisors. Am J OrthodDentofacial Orthop, 1994, 106(5): 455–462
doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70067-2
|
|
Artun J, Grobéty D. Periodontal status of mandibularincisors after pronounced orthodontic advancement during adolescence:a follow-up evaluation. Am J Orthod DentofacialOrthop, 2001, 119(1): 2–10
doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.111403
|
|
Melsen B, Allais D. Factors of importance forthe development of dehiscences during labial movement of mandibularincisors: a retrospective study of adult orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2005, 127(5): 552–561
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.12.026
|
|
Yared K F, Zenobio E G, Pacheco W. Periodontal status of mandibular central incisors afterorthodontic proclination in adults. AmJ Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2006, 130(1): 6.e1–6.e8
|
|
Sarikaya S, Haydar B, Ciger S, Ariyurek M. Changesin alveolar bone thickness due to retraction of anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2002, 122(1): 15–26
doi: 10.1067/mod.2002.119804
|
|
Nelson P A, Artun J. Alveolar bone loss of maxillaryanterior teeth in adult orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1997, 111(3): 328–334
doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70192-6
|
|
Yamada C, Kitai N, Kakimoto N, Murakami S, Furukawa S, Takada K. Spatial relationships between the mandibular centralincisor and associated alveolar bone in adults with mandibular prognathism. Angle Orthod, 2007, 77(5): 766–772
doi: 10.2319/072906-309
|
|
Horiuchi A, Hotokezaka H, Kobayashi K. Correlation between cortical plate proximity and apicalroot resorption. Am J Orthod DentofacialOrthop, 1998, 114(3): 311–318
doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70214-8
|
|
Nanda R. Biomechanicsin Clinical Orthodontics. Philadelphia:W.B. Saunders Company, 1997, 109–142
|
|
Mulie R M, Ten Hoeve A T. The limitations of toothmovement within the symphysis studied with laminagraphy. J Clin Orthod, 1976, 10(12): 882–893
|
|
Wainwright W M. Orthodontic movement and return of the root apex through the corticalplate in the Macaca speciosa monkey. Am J Orthod, 1972, 62(6): 635–636
doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(72)90015-2
|
|
Sharpe W, Reed B, Subtelny J D, Polson A. Orthodonticrelapse, apical root resorption, and crestal alveolar bone levels. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1987, 91(3): 252–258
doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(87)90455-0
|
|
Rossouw P E, Preston C B, Lombard C J, Truter J W. A longitudinal evaluation of the anterior border of the dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1993, 104(2): 146–152
doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81004-2
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|