Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering

ISSN 2095-0233

ISSN 2095-0241(Online)

CN 11-5984/TH

Postal Subscription Code 80-975

2018 Impact Factor: 0.989

Front. Mech. Eng.    2019, Vol. 14 Issue (3) : 351-357    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-019-0528-z
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Finite element modeling of counter-roller spinning for large-sized aluminum alloy cylindrical parts
Dawei ZHANG(), Fan LI, Shuaipeng LI, Shengdun ZHAO
School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
 Download: PDF(4526 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Counter-roller spinning (CRS), where the mandrel is replaced by rollers, is an effective means of manufacturing large-sized, thin-walled, cylindrical parts with more than 2500 mm diameter. CRS is very complex because of multi-axis rotation, multi-local loading along the circumference, and radial-axial compound deformation. Analytical or experimental methods cannot fully understand CRS. Meanwhile, numerical simulation is an adequate approach to investigate CRS with comprehensive understanding and a low cost. Thus, a finite element (FE) model of CRS was developed with the FORGE code via meshing technology, material modeling, determining the friction condition, and so on. The local fine mesh moving with the roller is one of highlights of the model. The developed 3D-FE model was validated through a CRS experiment by using a tubular blank with a 720 mm outer diameter. The developed 3D-FE model of CRS can provide a basis for parameter optimization, process control, die design, and so on. The data on force and energy predicted by the 3D-FE model can offer reasonable suggestions for determining the main mechanical parameters of CRS machines and selecting the motors. With the predicted data, an all-electric servo-drive system/machine with distributed power was designed in this work for CRS with four pairs of rollers to manufacture a large-sized, thin-walled, cylindrical part with 6000 mm diameter.

Keywords large-sized cylindrical part      counter-roller spinning      aluminum alloy      finite element method      distributed power     
Corresponding Author(s): Dawei ZHANG   
Just Accepted Date: 20 November 2018   Online First Date: 21 December 2018    Issue Date: 24 July 2019
 Cite this article:   
Dawei ZHANG,Fan LI,Shuaipeng LI, et al. Finite element modeling of counter-roller spinning for large-sized aluminum alloy cylindrical parts[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2019, 14(3): 351-357.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/EN/10.1007/s11465-019-0528-z
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/EN/Y2019/V14/I3/351
Fig.1  Sketch of counter-roller spinning
Strain rate/s−1 Yield strength/MPa Compressive strength/MPa
0.01 145.3 463.4
0.05 176.3 548.5
Tab.1  Main parameters of aluminum alloy 5052
Fig.2  FE model of the CRS process (backward spinning process with four pairs of rollers): (a) Assembly relations of geometry models and (b) local fine mesh of the tubular blank/workpiece
Fig.3  Shape of the compressed ring of aluminum alloy 5052: (a) Lubricated condition and (b) dry friction
Fig.4  CRS process with two pairs of rollers: (a) 3D-FE model, (b) spinning experiment, and (c) structure of the roller (unit: mm)
Parameter Value
Material Aluminum alloy 5052
Outer diameter of the tubular blank 720 mm
Outer thickness reduction ratio 20%
Inner thickness reduction ratio 15%
Axial infeeding speed of the roller 1 mm/r
Rotational speed of the workpiece 45 r/min
Friction condition Lubricated condition (m=0.15)
Tab.2  Main parameters in the counter-roller spinning experiment
Fig.5  Shape of the cylindrical part after spinning: (a) Experimental result and (b) numerical result
Fig.6  Distribution of wall thickness
Fig.7  Distribution of field variables: (a) Effective stress and (b) effective strain
Fig.8  Force and torque of counter-roller spinning for a 6 m aluminum alloy cylindrical part: (a) Spinning force of the roller and (b) torque of the turntable
Fig.9  3D model of the vertical counter-roller spinning machine
Fig.10  Rotation mechanism of the tubular blank/workpiece: (a) Overall layout, (b) one double-geared-roll appliance, and (c) double-geared roll
1 C C Wong, T A Dean, J Lin. A review of spinning, shear forming and flow forming process. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2003, 43(14): 1419–1435
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(03)00172-X
2 Q X Xia, G F Xiao, H Long, et al. A review of process advancement of novel metal spinning. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2014, 85: 100–121
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2014.05.005
3 M Zhan, H Yang, J Guo, et al. Review on hot spinning for difficult-to-deform lightweight metals. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2015, 25(6): 1732–1743
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(15)63778-5
4 F Ma, H Yang, M Zhan. Plastic deformation behaviors and their application in power spinning process of conical parts with transverse inner rib. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2010, 210(1): 180–189
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.07.006
5 M Zhan, J Guo, M W Fu, et al. Formation mechanism and control of flaring in forward tube spinning. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2018, 94(1–4): 59–72
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0690-6
6 J H Zhang, M Zhan, H Yang, et al. 3D-FE modeling for power spinning of large ellipsoidal heads with variable thicknesses. Computational Materials Science, 2012, 53(1): 303–313
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.08.010
7 X W Cao, L W Zhang, Y T Yang, et al. Progress of research on counter-roller forming. Hot Working Technology, 2013, 42(9): 115–117 (in Chinese)
8 X Y Zhou. Counter-roller spinning: A new process for manufacturing large tube with high strength and precision. Forging & Stamping Technology, 1993, 18(2): 49–51 (in Chinese)
9 G F Xiao, Q X Xia, X Q Cheng, et al. Research on the grain refinement method of cylindrical parts. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2015, 78(5‒8): 971–979
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6686-6
10 H Grönert, M Eckert, H von Petersdorff, et al. US Patent, 4766752, 1988-08-30
11 H Grönert, M Eckert. US Patent, 4951490, 1990-08-28
12 H Yang, M Zhan, Y L Liu, et al. Some advanced plastic processing technologies and their numerical simulation. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2004, 151(1–3): 63–69
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.015
13 D W Zhang, H Yang, Z C Sun. 3D-FE modelling and simulation of multi-way loading process for multi-ported valve. Steel Research International, 2010, 81(3): 210–215
https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.200900110
14 D W Zhang, S D Zhao. Numerical study on forming complex fitting body on end of integrated stainless steel pipe without welds. Journal of Central South University, 2016, 23(2): 269–276
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-016-3070-8
15 D W Zhang, S D Zhao, H Yang. Analysis of deformation characteristic in multi-way loading forming process of aluminum alloy cross valve based on finite element model. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2014, 24(1): 199–207
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(14)63048-X
16 Z Y Xiao, T Zhang. Rigid-plastic finite element analysis of opposite roller spinning. Forging & Stamping Technology, 1999, 24(1): 27–30 (in Chinese)
17 G F Xiao, Q X Xia, X Q Cheng, et al. Metal flow model of cylindrical parts by counter-roller spinning. Procedia Engineering, 2014, 81: 2397–2402
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.340
18 Q H Xi, W X Fan, W Lv, et al. Orthogonal test of counter roller spinning by numerical simulation. Forging & Stamping Technology, 2016, 41(8): 154–158 (in Chinese)
19 D B Shan, Y Q Zhang, Y Wang, et al. Defect analysis of complex-shape aluminum alloy forging. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2006, 16(S3): 1574–1579
20 M He, F G Li, Z G Wang. Forming limit stress diagram prediction of aluminum alloy 5052 based on GTN model parameters determined by in situ tensile test. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2011, 24(3): 378–386
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1000-9361(11)60045-9
21 X X Wang, M Zhan, J Guo, et al. Evaluating the applicability of GTN damage model in forward tube spinning of aluminum alloy. Metals, 2016, 6(6): 136
https://doi.org/10.3390/met6060136
22 T Altan, S I Oh, H L Gegel. Metal Forming: Fundamentals and Application. Metal Park: American Society for Metals, 1983
23 D W Zhang, H Yang, H W Li, et al. Friction factor evaluation by FEM and experiment for TA15 titanium alloy in isothermal forming process. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2012, 60(5–8): 527–536
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3624-8
24 D W Zhang, H Ou. Relationship between friction parameters in Coulomb-Tresca friction model for bulk metal forming. Tribology International, 2016, 95: 13–18
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2015.10.030
25 D W Zhang, M C Cui, M Cao, et al. Determination of friction conditions in cold-rolling process of shaft part by using incremental ring compression test. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2017, 91(9–12): 3823–3831
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0087-6
[1] Xinyu HUI, Yingjie XU, Weihong ZHANG. Multiscale model of micro curing residual stress evolution in carbon fiber-reinforced thermoset polymer composites[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2020, 15(3): 475-483.
[2] Tianfeng ZHOU, Ying WANG, Benshuai RUAN, Zhiqiang LIANG, Xibin WANG. Modeling of the minimum cutting thickness in micro cutting with consideration of the friction around the cutting zone[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2020, 15(1): 81-88.
[3] Y. Luo, S. C. Wu, Y. N. Hu, Y. N. Fu. Cracking evolution behaviors of lightweight materials based on in situ synchrotron X-ray tomography: A review[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2018, 13(4): 461-481.
[4] Jie SHAO, Tielin SHI, Li DU, Lei SU, Xiangning LU, Guanglan LIAO. Analysis on annealing-induced stress of blind-via TSV using FEM[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2018, 13(3): 401-410.
[5] Lei DENG, Xinyun WANG, Junsong JIN, Juchen XIA. Precision forging technology for aluminum alloy[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2018, 13(1): 25-36.
[6] Rongjing ZHANG,Lihui LANG,Rizwan ZAFAR. FEM-based strain analysis study for multilayer sheet forming process[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2015, 10(4): 373-379.
[7] Bhaskar Kumar MADETI,Srinivasa Rao CHALAMALASETTI,S K Sundara siva rao BOLLA PRAGADA. Biomechanics of knee joint – A review[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2015, 10(2): 176-186.
[8] Lezhi YE,Guangzhao YANG,Desheng LI. Analytical model and finite element computation of braking torque in electromagnetic retarder[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2014, 9(4): 368-379.
[9] Van Thanh NGO, Danmei XIE, Yangheng XIONG, Hengliang ZHANG, Yi YANG. Dynamic analysis of a rig shafting vibration based on finite element[J]. Front Mech Eng, 2013, 8(3): 244-251.
[10] Li LI, Michael Yu WANG, Peng WEI. XFEM schemes for level set based structural optimization[J]. Front Mech Eng, 2012, 7(4): 335-356.
[11] Jianxun LIANG, Ou MA, Caishan LIU. Model reduction of contact dynamics simulation using a modified Lyapunov balancing method[J]. Front Mech Eng, 2011, 6(4): 383-391.
[12] Wenbin LI, Hiromasa SAKAI, Shota HARADA, Yasushi TAKASE, Nao-Aki NODA. Separation mechanism for double cylinder with shrink fitting system used for ceramics conveying rollers[J]. Front Mech Eng, 2011, 6(3): 277-286.
[13] Lezhi YE, Desheng LI, Bingfeng JIAO. Three-dimensional electromagnetic analysis and design of permanent magnet retarder[J]. Front Mech Eng Chin, 2010, 5(4): 438-441.
[14] Hui AN, Fan HE, Lingxia XING, Xiaoyang LI. Oscillation frequency of simplified arterial tubes[J]. Front Mech Eng Chin, 2009, 4(3): 300-304.
[15] WANG Xuyue, XU Weixing, CHEN Hua, WANG Jinsong. Parameter prediction in laser bending of aluminum alloy sheet[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2008, 3(3): 293-298.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed