Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Architectural Research

ISSN 2095-2635

ISSN 2095-2643(Online)

CN 10-1024/TU

Postal Subscription Code 80-966

Front. Archit. Res.    2019, Vol. 8 Issue (1) : 106-119    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2018.05.003
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Comparative study of the factors affecting the generativity of office spaces
Maziar Asefi(), Farzin Haghparast, Elaheh Sharifi
Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, TabrizIs lamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran
 Download: PDF(3363 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

This study investigated the categories of generative and conservative offices by using syntactic theories and conducting a comparativean alysis of two different layout configurations. Generativity depends on several features that include but are not limited to spatial criteria. Generativity is also affected by aspects that extend beyond the physical, such as the symbolic relationship between the social organism of an organization and the internal structure of a workplace. Results show that no consistent relationship exists between spatial variables and behaviors even though the examined layouts satisfy an organization's basi ccultural require-ments, including privacy, territoriality, and hierarchy. Spatial parameters increase the potential for generativity, but such increase is not guaranteed without necessary changes in the attitudes, programs, and policies of organizations. Recognizing the limits of spatial variables requires evidence-based field research on office settings to determine operational and tailor-made solutions.

Keywords Office space      Generativity      Spatial configuration      Culture     
Corresponding Author(s): Maziar Asefi   
Issue Date: 04 April 2019
 Cite this article:   
Maziar Asefi,Farzin Haghparast,Elaheh Sharifi. Comparative study of the factors affecting the generativity of office spaces[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2019, 8(1): 106-119.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/10.1016/j.foar.2018.05.003
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foar/EN/Y2019/V8/I1/106
[1] Jie Ding, Shanshan Ma. Comparative analysis of habitation behavioral patterns in spatial configuration of traditional houses in Anhui, Jiangsu, and Zhejiang provinces of China[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(1): 54-66.
[2] Maurice Mitchell, Amara Roca Iglesias. Urban agriculture in Kathmandu as a catalyst for the civic inclusion of migrants and the making of a greener city[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2020, 9(1): 169-190.
[3] Tatiana Sergeevna Reshetnikova. Reconstruction of the remembrance: Palace of Culture in Slantsy[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2019, 8(4): 572-590.
[4] Nayeem Asif, Nangkula Utaberta, Azmal Bin Sabil, Sumarni Ismail. Reflection of cultural practices on syntactical values: An introduction to the application of space syntax to vernacular Malay architecture[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2018, 7(4): 521-529.
[5] Meidwinna Vania Michiani,Junichiro Asano. Influence of inhabitant background on the physical changes of Banjarese houses: A case study in Kuin Utara settlement, Banjarmasin, Indonesia[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2016, 5(4): 412-424.
[6] Saeid Alitajer,Ghazaleh Molavi Nojoumi. Privacy athome: Analysis of behavioral patterns in the spatial configuration of traditional and modern houses in the city of Hamedan based on the notion of space syntax[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2016, 5(3): 341-352.
[7] Faris Ali Mustafa, Ahmad Sanusi Hassan. Mosque layout design: An analytical study of mosque layouts in the early Ottoman period[J]. Front. Archit. Res., 2013, 2(4): 445-456.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed