This contribution reviews the symmetry properties of the interacting boson model of Arima and Iachello. While the concept of a dynamical symmetry is by now a familiar one, this is not necessarily so for the extended notions of partial dynamical symmetry and quasi dynamical symmetry, which can be beautifully illustrated in the context of the interacting boson model. The main conclusion of the analysis is that dynamical symmetries are scarce while their partial and quasi extensions are ubiquitous.
D. M. Brink, A. F. R. De Toledo Piza, and A. K. Kerman, Interval rules and intensity ratios in vibrating spherical nuclei, Phys. Lett. 19(5), 413 (1965) https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9163(65)90922-4
5
A. Bohr and B. R. Mottelson, Mat. Fys. Medd. Dan. Vid. Selsk. 27, 16 (1953)
6
L. Wilets and M. Jean, Surface oscillations in even-even nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 102, 788 (1956)
7
A. Arima, T. Otsuka, F. Iachello, and I. Talmi, Collective nuclear states as symmetric couplings of proton and neutron excitations, Phys. Lett. B 66(3), 205 (1977) https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(77)90860-7
E. Wigner, On the consequences of the symmetry of the nuclear hamiltonian on the spectroscopy of nuclei, Phys. Rev. 51(2), 106 (1937) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.51.106
J. P. Elliott, Collective motion in the nuclear shell model (I): Classification schemes for states of mixed configurations, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 245(1240), 128 (1958) https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1958.0072
16
J. P. Elliott, Collective motion in the nuclear shell model (II): The introduction of intrinsic wave-functions, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 245(1243), 562 (1958) https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1958.0101
17
F. Iachello, Lie Algebras and Applications, Springer, Berlin, 2006
J. N. Ginocchio and M. W. Kirson, Relationship between the Bohr collective hamiltonian and the interacting-boson model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44(26), 1744 (1980) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.44.1744
21
A. E. L. Dieperink, O. Scholten, and F. Iachello, Classical limit of the interacting-boson model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44(26), 1747 (1980) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.44.1747
22
A. Bohr and B. R. Mottelson, Features of nuclear deformations produced by the alignment of individual particles or pairs, Phys. Scr. 22(5), 468 (1980) https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/22/5/008
23
A. Bohr and B. R. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure (II): Nuclear Deformations, Benjamin, New York, 1975
24
R. Gilmore, Catastrophe Theory for Scientists and Engineers, Wiley, New York, 1981
25
E. López-Moreno and O. Castaños, Shapes and stability within the interacting boson model: Dynamical symmetries, Phys. Rev. C 54(5), 2374 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.54.2374
26
J. Jolie, P. Cejnar, R. F. Casten, S. Heinze, A. Linnemann, and V. Werner, Triple point of nuclear deformations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89(18), 182502 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.182502
27
R. F. Casten, Shape phase transitions and critical-point phenomena in atomic nuclei, Nat. Phys. 2(12), 811 (2006)
28
P. Cejnar, J. Jolie, and R. F. Casten, Quantum phase transitions in the shapes of atomic nuclei, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82(3), 2155 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.2155
29
O. Castaños, E. Chacón, A. Frank, and M. Moshinsky, Group theory of the interacting boson model of the nucleus, J. Math. Phys. 20(1), 35 (1979) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.523959
A. Arima and F. Iachello, Interacting boson model of collective nuclear states (II): The rotational limit, Ann. Phys. 111(1), 201 (1978) https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(78)90228-2
A. M. Shirokov, N. A. Smirnova, and Yu. F. Smirnov, Parameter symmetry of the interacting boson model, Phys. Lett. B 434(3–4), 237 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00791-6
D. D. Warner, and R. F. Casten, Predictions of the interacting boson approximation in a consistent Qframework, Phys. Rev. C 28(4), 1798 (1983) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.28.1798
36
P. O. Lipas, P. Toivonen, and D. D. Warner, IBA consistent-Qformalism extended to the vibrational region, Phys. Lett. B 155(5–6), 295 (1985) https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(85)91573-4
37
R. F. Casten, Status of experimental tests of the IBA, in: Interacting Bose–Fermi Systems in Nuclei, edited by F. Iachello, Plenum, New York, 1981, page 3 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1523-1_1
A. Leviatan, A. Novoselsky, and I. Talmi, O(5) symmetry in IBA-1 — the O(6)–U(5) transition region, Phys. Lett. B 172(2), 144 (1986) https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(86)90824-5
C. Kremer, J. Beller, A. Leviatan, N. Pietralla, G. Rainovski, R. Trippel, and P. Van Isacker, Linking partial and quasi dynamical symmetries in rotational nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 89, 041302(R) (2014)
46
F. Pan and J. P. Draayer, New algebraic solutions for SO(6)↔U(5) transitional nuclei in the interacting boson model, Nucl. Phys. A 636(2), 156 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(98)00207-3
47
D. J. Rowe, P. Rochford, and J. Repka, Dynamic structure and embedded representation in physics: The group theory of the adiabatic approximation, J. Math. Phys. 29(3), 572 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.528049
48
D. J. Rowe, C. Bahri, and W. Wijesundera, Exactly solvable model of a superconducting to rotational phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80(20), 4394 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4394
49
C. Bahri and D. J. Rowe, SU(3) quasi-dynamical symmetry as an organizational mechanism for generating nuclear rotational motions, Nucl. Phys. A 662(1–2), 125 (2000)
50
M. Macek, J. Dobeš, and P. Cejnar, Transition from γ-rigid to γ-soft dynamics in the interacting boson model: Quasicriticality and quasidynamical symmetry, Phys. Rev. C 80(1), 014319 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.80.014319
51
D. Bonatsos, E. A. McCutchan, and R. F. Casten, SU(3) quasidynamical symmetry underlying the Alhassid–Whelan arc of regularity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104(2), 022502 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.022502
