Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Physics

ISSN 2095-0462

ISSN 2095-0470(Online)

CN 11-5994/O4

邮发代号 80-965

2019 Impact Factor: 2.502

Frontiers of Physics  2018, Vol. 13 Issue (6): 132104   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-018-0834-7
  本期目录
Approaching nuclei through multiple perspectives and diverse models: Patterns, symmetries, interactions
R. F. Casten1,2()
1. Wright Nuclear Structure Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
2. Michigan State University- FRIB, East Lansing, MI, USA
 全文: PDF(1576 KB)  
Abstract

Nuclei are complex objects yet display remarkable simplicities and regular patterns. The study of these and their origins has long been one of the twin pillars of nuclear structure research. We will discuss the behavior of atomic nuclei from this point of view. A key element will be the advantages of looking at the same data from different perspectives and of inter-relating these perspectives.

Key wordsnuclear structure    simple patterns and symmetries    diverse perspectives and models    emergence of collectivity    residual interactions
收稿日期: 2018-07-18      出版日期: 2018-12-13
Corresponding Author(s): R. F. Casten   
 引用本文:   
. [J]. Frontiers of Physics, 2018, 13(6): 132104.
R. F. Casten. Approaching nuclei through multiple perspectives and diverse models: Patterns, symmetries, interactions. Front. Phys. , 2018, 13(6): 132104.
 链接本文:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fop/CN/10.1007/s11467-018-0834-7
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fop/CN/Y2018/V13/I6/132104
1 A. Arima and F. Iachello, New symmetry in the sdboson model of nuclei: The group O(6), Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 385 (1978)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.385
2 A. Arima and F. Iachello, Interacting boson model of collective states (I): The vibrational limit, Ann. Phys. 99, 253 (1976)
https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(76)90097-X
3 A. Arima and F. Iachello, Interacting boson model of collective nuclear states (II): The rotational limit, Ann. Phys. 111, 201 (1978)
https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(78)90228-2
4 A. Arima and F. Iachello, Interacting Boson model of collective nuclear states (IV): The O(6) limit, Ann. Phys. 123, 468 (1979)
https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(79)90347-6
5 A. Arima, T. Otsuka, F. Iachello, and I. Talmi, Collective nuclear states as symmetric couplings of proton and neutron excitations, Phys. Lett. B 66, 205 (1977)
https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(77)90860-7
6 D. R. Janssen, R. V. Jolos, and F. Donau, An algebraic treatment of the nuclear quadrupole degree of freedom, Nucl. Phys. A 224, 93 (1974)
https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(74)90165-1
7 R. F. Casten, Nuclear Structure from a Simple Perspective, 2nd Ed., Oxford University Press, 2000
8 R. B. Cakirli and R. F. Casten, Empirical signature for shape transitions mediated by sub-shell changes, Phys. Rev. C 78, 041301(R) (2008)
9 R. F. Casten and N. V. Zamfir, Empirical realization of a critical point description in atomic nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 052503 (2001)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.052503
10 F. Iachello, Analytic description of critical point nuclei in a spherical-axially deformed shape phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 052502 (2001)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.052502
11 A. Couture, R. F. Casten, and R. B. Cakirli, Simple, empirical approach to predict neutron capture cross sections from nuclear masses, Phys. Rev. C 96, 061601(R) (2017)
12 J. A. Cizewski, R. F. Casten, G. J. Smith, M. L. Stelts, W. R. Kane, H. G. Borner, and W. F. Davidson, Evidence for a new symmetry in nuclei: The structure of 196Pt and the O(6) limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 167 (1978)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.167
13 R. F. Casten, Interacting Bosons in Nuclear Physics, Ed. F. Iachello, Plenum Press, New York, 1978, p. 37
14 A. S. Davydov and G. F. Filippov, Rotational states in even atomic nuclei, Nucl. Phys. 8, 237 (1958)
https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5582(58)90153-6
15 J. N. Ginocchio and M. W. Kirson, An intrinsic state for the interacting boson model and its relationship to the Bohr–Mottelson model, Nucl. Phys. A 350(1–2), 31 (1980)
https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(80)90387-5
16 R. F. Casten, NpNn systematics in heavy nuclei, Nucl. Phys. A 443(1), 1 (1985)
https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(85)90318-5
17 R. F. Casten, D. S. Brenner, and P. E. Haustein, Valence p-ninteractions and the development of collectivity in heavy nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58(7), 658 (1987)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.658
18 A. de-Shalit and M. Goldhaber, Mixed configurations in nuclei, Phys. Rev. 92(5), 1211 (1953)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.92.1211
19 I. Talmi, Effective interactions and coupling schemes in nuclei, Rev. Mod. Phys. 34(4), 704 (1962)
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.34.704
20 P. Federman and S. Pittel, Towards a unified microscopic description of nuclear deformation, Phys. Lett. B 69(4), 385 (1977)
https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(77)90825-5
21 R. F. Casten, D. D. Warner, D. S. Brenner, and R. L. Gill, Relation between the Z= 64 shell closure and the onset of deformation at N= 88–90, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47(20), 1433 (1981)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.1433
22 J. D. Garrett and Z.Y. Zhang, Abstract, International Conference on Contemporary Topics in Nuclear Structure Physics, Cocoyoc, Mexico, June 9–14, 1988
23 J. Y. Zhang, R. F. Casten, and D. S. Brenner, Empirical proton-neutron interaction energies: Linearity and saturation phenomena, Phys. Lett. B 227(1), 1 (1989)
https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(89)91273-2
24 R. B. Cakirli, D. S. Brenner, R. F. Casten, and E. A. Millman, Proton-neutron interactions and the new atomic masses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94(9), 092501 (2005) [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 95(11), 119903 (2005)]
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.092501
25 D. S. Brenner, R. B. Cakirli, and R. F. Casten, Valence proton-neutron interactions throughout the mass surface, Phys. Rev. C 73(3), 034315 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.73.034315
26 R. B. Cakirli and R. F. Casten, Direct empirical correlation between proton-neutron interaction strengths and the growth of collectivity in nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96(13), 132501 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.132501
27 R. B. Cakirli, K. Blaum, and R. F. Casten, Indication of a mini-valenceWigner-like energy in heavy nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 82, 061304(R) (2010)
28 G. Alaga, K. Alder, A. Bohr, and B. R. Mottelson, Intensity rules for beta and gamma transitions to nuclear rotational states, Dan. Mat. Fys. Medd. 29, 9 (1955)
29 P. O. Lipas, Perturbation corrections to energies of collective states in deformed even nuclei, Nucl. Phys. 39, 468 (1962)
https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5582(62)90405-4
30 L. L. Riedinger, N. R. Johnson, and J. H. Hamilton, β- and γ-Vibrational Bands of 152Sm and 154Gd, Phys. Rev. 179(4), 1214 (1969)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.179.1214
31 D. D. Warner and R. F. Casten, Revised formulation of the phenomenological interacting boson approximation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48(20), 1385 (1982)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1385
32 A. Leviatan, Partial dynamical symmetry in deformed nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77(5), 818 (1996)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.818
33 D. Bonatsos, I. E. Assimakis, N. Minkov, A. Martinou, R. B. Cakirli, R. F. Casten, and K. Blaum, Proxy-SU(3) symmetry in heavy deformed nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 95, 064325 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.064325
34 D. Bonatsos, I. E. Assimakis, N. Minkov, A. Martinou, S. Sarantopoulou, R. B. Cakirli, R. F. Casten, and K. Blaum, Analytic predictions for nuclear shapes, prolate dominance, and the prolate-oblate shape transition in the proxy-SU(3) model, Phys. Rev. C 95, 064326 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.064326
35 Talks by R. F. Casten and R. B. Cakirli to be given at SSNET18, Nov. 5–9, 2018, Paris, France
36 R. D. Ratna Raju, J. P. Draayer, and K. T. Hecht, Search for a coupling scheme in heavy deformed nuclei: The pseudo SU(3) model, Nucl. Phys. A 202(3), 433 (1973)
https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(73)90635-0
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed