|
|
|
Approaching nuclei through multiple perspectives and diverse models: Patterns, symmetries, interactions |
R. F. Casten1,2() |
1. Wright Nuclear Structure Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA 2. Michigan State University- FRIB, East Lansing, MI, USA |
1 |
A. Arima and F. Iachello, New symmetry in the sdboson model of nuclei: The group O(6), Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 385 (1978)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.385
|
2 |
A. Arima and F. Iachello, Interacting boson model of collective states (I): The vibrational limit, Ann. Phys. 99, 253 (1976)
https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(76)90097-X
|
3 |
A. Arima and F. Iachello, Interacting boson model of collective nuclear states (II): The rotational limit, Ann. Phys. 111, 201 (1978)
https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(78)90228-2
|
4 |
A. Arima and F. Iachello, Interacting Boson model of collective nuclear states (IV): The O(6) limit, Ann. Phys. 123, 468 (1979)
https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(79)90347-6
|
5 |
A. Arima, T. Otsuka, F. Iachello, and I. Talmi, Collective nuclear states as symmetric couplings of proton and neutron excitations, Phys. Lett. B 66, 205 (1977)
https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(77)90860-7
|
6 |
D. R. Janssen, R. V. Jolos, and F. Donau, An algebraic treatment of the nuclear quadrupole degree of freedom, Nucl. Phys. A 224, 93 (1974)
https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(74)90165-1
|
7 |
R. F. Casten, Nuclear Structure from a Simple Perspective, 2nd Ed., Oxford University Press, 2000
|
8 |
R. B. Cakirli and R. F. Casten, Empirical signature for shape transitions mediated by sub-shell changes, Phys. Rev. C 78, 041301(R) (2008)
|
9 |
R. F. Casten and N. V. Zamfir, Empirical realization of a critical point description in atomic nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 052503 (2001)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.052503
|
10 |
F. Iachello, Analytic description of critical point nuclei in a spherical-axially deformed shape phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 052502 (2001)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.052502
|
11 |
A. Couture, R. F. Casten, and R. B. Cakirli, Simple, empirical approach to predict neutron capture cross sections from nuclear masses, Phys. Rev. C 96, 061601(R) (2017)
|
12 |
J. A. Cizewski, R. F. Casten, G. J. Smith, M. L. Stelts, W. R. Kane, H. G. Borner, and W. F. Davidson, Evidence for a new symmetry in nuclei: The structure of 196Pt and the O(6) limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 167 (1978)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.167
|
13 |
R. F. Casten, Interacting Bosons in Nuclear Physics, Ed. F. Iachello, Plenum Press, New York, 1978, p. 37
|
14 |
A. S. Davydov and G. F. Filippov, Rotational states in even atomic nuclei, Nucl. Phys. 8, 237 (1958)
https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5582(58)90153-6
|
15 |
J. N. Ginocchio and M. W. Kirson, An intrinsic state for the interacting boson model and its relationship to the Bohr–Mottelson model, Nucl. Phys. A 350(1–2), 31 (1980)
https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(80)90387-5
|
16 |
R. F. Casten, NpNn systematics in heavy nuclei, Nucl. Phys. A 443(1), 1 (1985)
https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(85)90318-5
|
17 |
R. F. Casten, D. S. Brenner, and P. E. Haustein, Valence p-ninteractions and the development of collectivity in heavy nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58(7), 658 (1987)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.658
|
18 |
A. de-Shalit and M. Goldhaber, Mixed configurations in nuclei, Phys. Rev. 92(5), 1211 (1953)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.92.1211
|
19 |
I. Talmi, Effective interactions and coupling schemes in nuclei, Rev. Mod. Phys. 34(4), 704 (1962)
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.34.704
|
20 |
P. Federman and S. Pittel, Towards a unified microscopic description of nuclear deformation, Phys. Lett. B 69(4), 385 (1977)
https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(77)90825-5
|
21 |
R. F. Casten, D. D. Warner, D. S. Brenner, and R. L. Gill, Relation between the Z= 64 shell closure and the onset of deformation at N= 88–90, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47(20), 1433 (1981)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.1433
|
22 |
J. D. Garrett and Z.Y. Zhang, Abstract, International Conference on Contemporary Topics in Nuclear Structure Physics, Cocoyoc, Mexico, June 9–14, 1988
|
23 |
J. Y. Zhang, R. F. Casten, and D. S. Brenner, Empirical proton-neutron interaction energies: Linearity and saturation phenomena, Phys. Lett. B 227(1), 1 (1989)
https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(89)91273-2
|
24 |
R. B. Cakirli, D. S. Brenner, R. F. Casten, and E. A. Millman, Proton-neutron interactions and the new atomic masses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94(9), 092501 (2005) [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 95(11), 119903 (2005)]
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.092501
|
25 |
D. S. Brenner, R. B. Cakirli, and R. F. Casten, Valence proton-neutron interactions throughout the mass surface, Phys. Rev. C 73(3), 034315 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.73.034315
|
26 |
R. B. Cakirli and R. F. Casten, Direct empirical correlation between proton-neutron interaction strengths and the growth of collectivity in nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96(13), 132501 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.132501
|
27 |
R. B. Cakirli, K. Blaum, and R. F. Casten, Indication of a mini-valenceWigner-like energy in heavy nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 82, 061304(R) (2010)
|
28 |
G. Alaga, K. Alder, A. Bohr, and B. R. Mottelson, Intensity rules for beta and gamma transitions to nuclear rotational states, Dan. Mat. Fys. Medd. 29, 9 (1955)
|
29 |
P. O. Lipas, Perturbation corrections to energies of collective states in deformed even nuclei, Nucl. Phys. 39, 468 (1962)
https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5582(62)90405-4
|
30 |
L. L. Riedinger, N. R. Johnson, and J. H. Hamilton, β- and γ-Vibrational Bands of 152Sm and 154Gd, Phys. Rev. 179(4), 1214 (1969)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.179.1214
|
31 |
D. D. Warner and R. F. Casten, Revised formulation of the phenomenological interacting boson approximation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48(20), 1385 (1982)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1385
|
32 |
A. Leviatan, Partial dynamical symmetry in deformed nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77(5), 818 (1996)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.818
|
33 |
D. Bonatsos, I. E. Assimakis, N. Minkov, A. Martinou, R. B. Cakirli, R. F. Casten, and K. Blaum, Proxy-SU(3) symmetry in heavy deformed nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 95, 064325 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.064325
|
34 |
D. Bonatsos, I. E. Assimakis, N. Minkov, A. Martinou, S. Sarantopoulou, R. B. Cakirli, R. F. Casten, and K. Blaum, Analytic predictions for nuclear shapes, prolate dominance, and the prolate-oblate shape transition in the proxy-SU(3) model, Phys. Rev. C 95, 064326 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.064326
|
35 |
Talks by R. F. Casten and R. B. Cakirli to be given at SSNET18, Nov. 5–9, 2018, Paris, France
|
36 |
R. D. Ratna Raju, J. P. Draayer, and K. T. Hecht, Search for a coupling scheme in heavy deformed nuclei: The pseudo SU(3) model, Nucl. Phys. A 202(3), 433 (1973)
https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(73)90635-0
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|