Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Philosophy in China

ISSN 1673-3436

ISSN 1673-355X(Online)

CN 11-5743/B

Postal Subscription Code 80-983

Front Phil Chin    2008, Vol. 3 Issue (1) : 139-150    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-008-0009-7
research-article
A critique of social radicalism: The debate between the Neo-Left and Liberalism —A discussion of Plessner within the Chinese context
 CAO Weidong
School of Chinese Language and Literature, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
 Download: PDF(323 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Compared with another founder of philosophical anthropology Max Scheler, Plessner is desolated by Chinese academe. His works have not been translated into Chinese systematically, and there are few articles about his life and thoughts. The reasons for this are complicated, but the most important point of these is that Plessner has paid most of his attention to the German problems. However, Plessner’s thought, especially his critique of social radicalism, enlightens us a lot. Plessner’s critique of modernity stimulates us to think about the controversy which broke out between New Left-wingers and Liberalists in the late 20th century and to discern the common ground between the two parties: Radicalism.

Corresponding Author(s): CAO Weidong,Email:caoweidong2000@sina.com   
Issue Date: 05 March 2008
 Cite this article:   
CAO Weidong. A critique of social radicalism: The debate between the Neo-Left and Liberalism —A discussion of Plessner within the Chinese context[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2008, 3(1): 139-150.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.1007/s11466-008-0009-7
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2008/V3/I1/139
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed