Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Philosophy in China

ISSN 1673-3436

ISSN 1673-355X(Online)

CN 11-5743/B

Postal Subscription Code 80-983

Front. Philos. China    2008, Vol. 3 Issue (2) : 294-306     DOI: 10.1007/s11466-008-0019-5
|
A critical analysis of structural realism
WANG Wei
Institute of Science, Technology and Society, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Download: PDF(236 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract  The epistemological version of structural realism, proposed by Cao Tianyu, has great influence in the philosophy of science. Syntheses has published a special volume discussing the topic. Cao criticizes anti-realism, as well as the epistemic and ontic versions of structural realism. From the concepts of structure, ontology, and construction, he analyzes the objectivity of scientific theories as having five aspects: construction, historicity, holism, revision, and revolution. This paper systematically analyzes and comments on Cao’s structural realism. The author agrees with his criticism of the under-determination thesis, is neutral to his argument against ontological discontinuity, and questions his universal language argument.
Issue Date: 05 June 2008
URL:  
http://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.1007/s11466-008-0019-5     OR     http://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2008/V3/I2/294
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed