Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Philosophy in China

ISSN 1673-3436

ISSN 1673-355X(Online)

CN 11-5743/B

Postal Subscription Code 80-983

Front Phil Chin    2009, Vol. 4 Issue (2) : 294-307    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-009-0019-0
research-article
Heidegger’s distortion of dialectics in “Hegel’s Concept of Experience”
DENG Xiaomang()
School of Philosophy, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
 Download: PDF(241 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

This essay reveals five points in which Heidegger misreads Hegel in “Hegel’s Concept of Experience”: (1) By forcedly introducing the concept of “will”, he interprets Hegel’s phenomenology of spirit into Metaphysics of Presence; (2) interprets concepts such as “statement” and “the road of skeptics” as the process of phenomenological reduction; (3) reduces Hegel’s Sein to Seiende; (4) replaces “Contradiction” with “Ambiguity” so the active Dialectics become passive; (5) exaggerates conscious experience and puts it into a real ontology, regardless of the significance of Logic and Encyclopedia of Philosophy. By an analysis of this misreading we can find the internal connection between Heidegger’s thought and that of his philosophical forerunner, Hegel.

Keywords phenomenology of spirit      misreading      dialectics      metaphysics of presence      experience     
Corresponding Author(s): DENG Xiaomang,Email:xmdeng@whu.edu.cn   
Issue Date: 05 June 2009
 Cite this article:   
DENG Xiaomang. Heidegger’s distortion of dialectics in “Hegel’s Concept of Experience”[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2009, 4(2): 294-307.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.1007/s11466-009-0019-0
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2009/V4/I2/294
[1] FEI Duoyi. Comparative Perspectives on Solutions for the Problem of Other Minds[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2020, 15(4): 636-652.
[2] LI Jing. Day and Night Overlap: Jan Patočka’s Phenomenological Interpretation of the Front-Line Experience[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2020, 15(3): 409-426.
[3] LUO Songtao. Dialectics of Individual Life and Moral Law: On Adorno’s Non-Identical Moral Philosophy[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2019, 14(3): 406-422.
[4] JIANG Niling, ZHOU Jing. Ontological Epistemology: William James and the Chinese Traditional Philosophy of Experience[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2019, 14(2): 342-356.
[5] Hans-Georg Moeller. Necessity and Memory in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit: A Reconstruction[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2018, 13(4): 505-517.
[6] DONG Lihe, JIN Qianwen. The Study of Western Postmodern Philosophy of History in China in the Four Decades of Reform and Opening Up[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2018, 13(2): 254-264.
[7] HE Jing, Ejgil Jespersen. Habitual Learning as Being-in-the-World: On Merleau-Ponty and the Experience of Learning[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(2): 306-321.
[8] Timothy O’Leary. Critique, Ethics, and the Apparatus of Experience: A Foucauldian Framework[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(1): 120-136.
[9] CHEN Yajun. Between Darwin and Hegel: On Dewey’s Concept of Experience[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(1): 104-119.
[10] LIU Jing. Growth, Experience and Nature in Dewey’s Philosophy and Chinese Philosophy[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(1): 90-103.
[11] Eva Kit Wah Man. A Cross-Cultural Reflection on Shusterman’s Suggestion of the “Transactional” Body[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(2): 181-191.
[12] WANG Tangjia. A Philosophical Analysis of the Concept of Crisis[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(2): 254-267.
[13] BAO Zhaohui, . The Advantages, Shortcomings, and Existential Issues of Zhuangzi’s Use of Images[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2010, 5(2): 196-211.
[14] WANG Huaping, SHENG Xiaoming. Cooperative naturalism[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2007, 2(4): 601-613.
[15] Wang Nanshi. Dialectics and practical wisdom[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2006, 1(2): 245-253.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed