Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Philosophy in China

ISSN 1673-3436

ISSN 1673-355X(Online)

CN 11-5743/B

Postal Subscription Code 80-983

Front. Philos. China    2009, Vol. 4 Issue (3) : 360-369     DOI: 10.1007/s11466-009-0023-4
Research articles |
Morality and nature: The essential difference between the Dao of Chinese philosophy and metaphysics in Western philosophy
YU Weidong , XU Jin ,
College of Philosophy, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China;
Download: PDF(218 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract  Both thinkings on Dao in Chinese philosophy and metaphysics in Western philosophy investigate things on a spiritual level that transcends experience, but there are incommensurable differences between them. The objective of “metaphysics” is ontological knowledge about nature from the perspective of epistemological “truth-pursuing”. Western metaphysics is thus a “metaphysics of nature”. Dao in Chinese philosophy, on the other hand, more often manifests itself in “good-pursuing” by means of the internal, experiential pursuit of moral stature and spiritual security. Philosophy of Dao is thus a “metaphysics of ethics”. The cause of this difference can be traced back to the differences between the rational tradition of the West, characterized by the dualism of the subject and the object, and the moral tradition of China, characterized by the integration of man and nature.
Keywords Dao      metaphysics      morality      nature      
Issue Date: 05 September 2009
URL:  
http://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.1007/s11466-009-0023-4     OR     http://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2009/V4/I3/360
[1] DING Sixin. A Study of the Key Concepts “Heng ” and “Hengxian ” in the Hengxian on Chu Bamboo Slips Housed at the Shanghai Museum[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(2): 206-221.
[2] TAN Mingran. The Problem of Confucian Moral Cultivation and Its Solution: Using Ritual Propriety to Support Rule by Law[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(1): 88-103.
[3] Tom Stoneham. Quine on Quantification and Existence[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(1): 54-72.
[4] Paul J. D’Ambrosio. Authenticity in the Zhuangzi ? Contemporary Misreadings of Zhen 真and an Alternative to Existentialism[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(3): 353-379.
[5] CHEN Guying. The Tradition of Emotive Writing in the Zhuangzi and Its Echoes in Later Generations[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(3): 340-352.
[6] Richard Shusterman. Somaesthetics and Chinese Philosophy: Between Unity and Pragmatist Pluralism[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(2): 201-211.
[7] GUO Yi. The Origin and Differentiation of the Theories of Human Nature in Pre-Qin China[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(2): 212-238.
[8] ZHAO Dongming. Neo-Confucian Theory of Mind as a Discourse of the Infinite: The Lu-Wang School[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(1): 75-94.
[9] BAO Yongling. Water, Plant, Light, and Mirror: On the Root Metaphors of the Heart-Mind in Wang Yangming’s Thought[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(1): 95-112.
[10] Leah Kalmanson,Sarah Mattice. The De of Levinas: Cultivating the Heart-Mind of Radical Passivity[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(1): 113-129.
[11] HUANG Mei Tin. The Encounter of Christianity and Daoism in Philippe Couplet’s Confucius Sinarum Philosophus[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(4): 615-624.
[12] Hektor K. T. Yan. Beyond a Theory of Human Nature: Towards an Alternative Interpretation of Mencius’ Ethics[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(3): 396-416.
[13] James Swindal. Marx on Nature[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(3): 358-369.
[14] XIA Ying. The Principle of Production and a Critique of Metaphysics: From the Perspective of Theory of Baudrillard Contractual Approach Based on Rawls’ Device of the “Original Position”[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(2): 181-193.
[15] LIU Xiang. “I Effaced Myself” and “The Disappearance of the Subject”: A Comparison between Zhuangzi and Jean Baudrillard’s Anti-Subjectivism[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(2): 213-228.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed