Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Philosophy in China

ISSN 1673-3436

ISSN 1673-355X(Online)

CN 11-5743/B

Postal Subscription Code 80-983

Front. Philos. China    2009, Vol. 4 Issue (4) : 511-523     DOI: 10.1007/s11466-009-0033-2
Research articles |
The evolution and formation of indigenous narration in Chinese philosophy
YU Zhiping,
Institute of Philosophy, Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences, Shanghai 200235, China;
Download: PDF(364 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract  Independent narration in Chinese philosophy has gone through the process of interpretation, critical differentiation, dialogue, and original thought, and so is a creative activity that surpasses the conjunctive pattern of universality and particularity. In modern Confucian studies, there has always been a tension between philosophical and historical explanations, which suggests a tension between ecumenical and indigenous experiences. Critical differentiation itself only has methodological significance, and is not a goal in itself. China’s development and strength has encouraged China to engage in philosophical dialogue with the West. It is the task and direction of future philosophical creativity to face the contemporary existence, re-construct Confucianism’s relationship with modern life, and respond in a metaphysical and positive manner to the challenges imposed by modernity.
Keywords Chinese philosophy      indigenous narration      philosophical explanation      historical explanation      critical differentiation      dialogue      original creation      
Issue Date: 05 December 2009
URL:  
http://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.1007/s11466-009-0033-2     OR     http://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2009/V4/I4/511
[1] GUO Yi. Research Findings Concerning Excavated Texts and Learning in Early China[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(2): 168-184.
[2] Russell Pryba. Ars Erotica and Ars Gastronomica in Shusterman’s Somaesthetics[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(2): 192-200.
[3] Byeong-uk Yi. Numeral Classifiers and the White Horse Paradox[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(4): 498-522.
[4] Ralph Weber. Why Talk about Chinese Metaphysics?[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(1): 99-119.
[5] ZHANG Xianglong, . The philosophical feature of Confucianism and its position in inter-cultural dialogue: Universalism or non-universalism?[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2009, 4(4): 483-492.
[6] XIANG Shiling. A study on the theory of “returning to the original” and “recovering nature” in Chinese philosophy[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2008, 3(4): 502-519.
[7] XU Jianping. A transition of Chinese humanism and aesthetics from rationalism to irrationalism —With a focus on the debate between Li Zhi and Geng Dingxiang during the Ming Dynasty[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2008, 3(2): 229-253.
[8] LI Cunshan. A differentiation of the meaning of “qi” on several levels[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2008, 3(2): 194-212.
[9] CAO Feng. A return to intellectual history: A new approach to pre-Qin discourse on name[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2008, 3(2): 213-228.
[10] FAN Hao. The meaning-dialogue in mutual interpretation of ethical-economical concepts and its value dissimilation[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2008, 3(2): 254-266.
[11] HU Weixi. On Confucian communitarianism[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2007, 2(4): 475-487.
[12] LI Xiangjun. An explanation of the Confucian idea of difference[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2007, 2(4): 488-502.
[13] SONG Zhiming. Achievements, predicaments and trend of Moral Confucianism[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2007, 2(4): 503-516.
[14] CUI Dahua. A weakness in Confucianism: Private and public moralities[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2007, 2(4): 517-532.
[15] LIN Cunguang. A new interpretation of Confucianism: The interpretation of Lunyu as a text of philosophical hermeneutics[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2007, 2(4): 533-546.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed