Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Philosophy in China

ISSN 1673-3436

ISSN 1673-355X(Online)

CN 11-5743/B

Postal Subscription Code 80-983

Front Phil Chin    2012, Vol. 7 Issue (1) : 164-178     DOI: 10.3868/s030-001-012-0010-8
research-article |
Comments on Plantinga’s Argument of Transworld Identity
ZHANG Lifeng()
Institute of Modern Logic and Logical Application, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
Download: PDF(282 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract  

Plantinga’s conception of possible worlds is problematic in one sense: it relies on the prior idea of modality. His strategy for resolving the puzzle of transworld identity is significant in the metaphysical sense but fruitless in the epistemological sense because world-indexed properties cannot be used as effectively in epistemic practice as their counterparts, i.e., space- and time-indexed properties. His isolation of transworld identification from transworld identity is unconvincing. This paper argues that the intelligibility of modal discourse and reference is the essence of transworld identity. It is also proved that transworld identification is the epistemic ground of such intelligibility. Hence, the transworld identification problem is the epistemological foundation of the transworld identity problem, and there must be a comprehensive answer to the former.

Keywords possible worlds      states of affairs      transworld identity      transworld identification      essence      epistemic ground     
Corresponding Authors: ZHANG Lifeng,Email:zhanglifeng@ymail.com   
Issue Date: 05 March 2012
URL:  
http://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.3868/s030-001-012-0010-8     OR     http://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2012/V7/I1/164
[1] HE Chaoan. What Is Not So Fine with Fine’s Critique of the Modal Account of Essence[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(2): 250-262.
[2] HAN Zhen , . Some Remarks on the Re-building of the Category of Essence and the Reflective Modernity[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2010, 5(1): 134-141.
[3] ZHANG Shiying. The double meanings of “essence”: The natural and humane sciences — A tentative linkage of Hegel, Dilthey, and Husserl[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2009, 4(1): 143-155.
[4] DUAN Dezhi. Aquinas’ transcendences to Aristotle in the doctrine of essence[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2007, 2(4): 572-582.
[5] Yang Geng, Zhang Qixue. The essence, characteristics and limitation of post-colonialism: from Karl Marx’s point of view[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2006, 1(2): 279-294.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed