Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Philosophy in China

ISSN 1673-3436

ISSN 1673-355X(Online)

CN 11-5743/B

Postal Subscription Code 80-983

Front Phil Chin    2012, Vol. 7 Issue (2) : 244-254     DOI: 10.3868/s030-001-012-0014-6
research-article |
Survey of Confucius’s Approach to Expediency
LU Youcai()
Department of Library, Henan Institute of Engineering, Zhengzhou 451191, China
Download: PDF(249 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract  

Confucius held that expediency means adjusting to changing circumstances, not necessarily going along with or against anything, having a sense of propriety about times and measures, and doing things in their proper time and manner. However, expediency does not mean doing whatever one likes without any principle; instead, it means taking benevolence and righteousness as criteria and acting accordingly. In Confucius’s opinion, one should cultivate benevolence internally and act with righteousness externally, weigh importance and unimportance, measure advantages and disadvantages, and not “set the mind either for anything, or against anything,” pursuing “what the heart desires, without transgressing what is right.” In this way, he would keep to benevolence without deviating from it, act expediently without despising any principles, and attain a dialectical unification of expediency and principles.

Keywords Confucius      quan      expediency      benevolence      righteousness      flexibility     
Corresponding Authors: LU Youcai,Email:hauelib@163.com   
Issue Date: 05 June 2012
URL:  
http://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.3868/s030-001-012-0014-6     OR     http://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2012/V7/I2/244
[1] Tom Stoneham. Quine on Quantification and Existence[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(1): 54-72.
[2] GUO Yi. The Origin and Differentiation of the Theories of Human Nature in Pre-Qin China[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(2): 212-238.
[3] HUANG Mei Tin. The Encounter of Christianity and Daoism in Philippe Couplet’s Confucius Sinarum Philosophus[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(4): 615-624.
[4] QU Hongmei. A Comparative Study on Confucius’ and Chrysippus’ Cosmopolitan Theories[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(3): 397-409.
[5] Gerard Walmsley. Is There a Place for Traditional Values and Virtues in Society Today?[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(1): 31-52.
[6] DING Ji. The Manifestation Range of Innately Good Knowledge and Ability, and the Danger of Separation: On Zhuzi’s Question about Understanding Words[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(2): 217-243.
[7] WANG Hongxia. On the Academic Differences between Xihe School and Zhusi School[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(1): 55-74.
[8] GUO Qiyong, CUI Tao. The Values of Confucian Benevolence and the Universality of the Confucian Way of Extending Love[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(1): 20-54.
[9] ZHANG Maoze. Confucius’ Transformation of Traditional Religious Ideas[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2011, 6(1): 20-40.
[10] LI Jinglin, . Mencius’ Refutation of Yang Zhu and Mozi and the Theoretical Implication of Confucian Benevolence and Love[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2010, 5(2): 155-178.
[11] CHEN Lisheng , . Courage in The Analects: A Genealogical Survey of the Confucian Virtue of Courage[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2010, 5(1): 1-30.
[12] GUO Qiyong. Mou Zongsan’s view of interpreting Confucianism by “moral autonomy”[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2007, 2(3): 345-362.
[13] HE Yuanguo. Confucius and Aristotle on friendship: A comparative study[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2007, 2(2): 291-307.
[14] Dongfang Shuo, Lin Hongcheng. Separation of politics and morality: a commentary on Analects of Confucius[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2006, 1(3): 401-417.
[15] Yang Guorong. On Luo Congyan’s Ethics[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2006, 1(1): 102-113.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed