Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Philosophy in China

ISSN 1673-3436

ISSN 1673-355X(Online)

CN 11-5743/B

Postal Subscription Code 80-983

Front Phil Chin    2012, Vol. 7 Issue (2) : 255-269     DOI: 10.3868/s030-001-012-0015-3
research-article |
On the Issues of Transcendental Argument
CHEN Jiaming()
Department of Philosophy, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
Download: PDF(258 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

The transcendental approach initiated by Immanuel Kant and Peter Strawson has been the most representative contemporary exponent of this line of thinking. Barry Stroud understands this form of transcendental argument as relying on an empirical “verification principle” and hence he rejects it as unnecessary. Nevertheless, Stroud’s view is only warranted to a certain extent. In some non-empirical objective spheres, including concepts and propositions as regards general metaphysics, moral metaphysics and philosophy of religion, the transcendental approach is still necessary. In terms of quality, transcendental approach belongs to “conceptual argumentation,” which differs from experience and logic with the fundamental characteristic of setting up a theoretical antecedent before further inquiry at the level of doctrine, i.e., concepts.

Keywords transcendental argument      metaphysics      Kant      Strawson     
Corresponding Authors: CHEN Jiaming,   
Issue Date: 05 June 2012
URL:     OR
[1] Tom Stoneham. Quine on Quantification and Existence[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(1): 54-72.
[2] ZHAO Dongming. Neo-Confucian Theory of Mind as a Discourse of the Infinite: The Lu-Wang School[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(1): 75-94.
[3] James Swindal. Marx on Nature[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(3): 358-369.
[4] XIA Ying. The Principle of Production and a Critique of Metaphysics: From the Perspective of Theory of Baudrillard Contractual Approach Based on Rawls’ Device of the “Original Position”[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(2): 181-193.
[5] Nicholas S. Brasovan. Conjunctions and/or Disjunctions: Radical Empiricism in the History of Philosophy[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(1): 130-148.
[6] Markus Gabriel. The Meaning of “Existence” and the Contingency of Sense[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(1): 109-129.
[7] LIU Jing. Kant’s Virtue as Strength[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(3): 451-470.
[8] Ralph Weber. Why Talk about Chinese Metaphysics?[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(1): 99-119.
[9] Rina Marie Camus. The Wiseman and the Sage: Metaphysics as Wisdom in Aristotle and the Neo-Confucian School of Principle[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(1): 120-139.
[10] XIE Wenyu. Kant’s Better Man and the Confucian Junzi[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(3): 481-497.
[11] James Garrison. On Cheng Chung-Ying’s Bentiyong Onto-hermeneutics[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(3): 471-480.
[12] YAN Mengwei. Tolerance or Hospitality?[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(1): 154-163.
[13] FANG Xudong. Confucian Ethics and Impartiality: On the Confucian View about Brotherhood[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(1): 1-19.
[14] Andrei A. BUCKAREFF. Intralevel Mental Causation[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2011, 6(3): 402-425.
[15] GAO Guoxi, . Kant’s Virtue Theory[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2010, 5(2): 266-279.
Full text