Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Philosophy in China

ISSN 1673-3436

ISSN 1673-355X(Online)

CN 11-5743/B

Postal Subscription Code 80-983

Front Phil Chin    2012, Vol. 7 Issue (4) : 572-597     DOI: 10.3868/s030-001-012-0037-1
research-article |
Religion, Politics and Ethics: Towards a Global Theory of Social Transformation
Oliver Davies()
School of Arts and Humanities, King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK
Download: PDF(317 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

In this paper I set out a phenomenology of social transformation, based on an analysis of the distinctively religious form of communication which underlies the trans-generational and trans-cultural transmission of world traditions, taking Confucianism and Christianity as their representatives. A phenomenological analysis of their communicative structure allows the possibility of a better understanding of what can be learnt from them in the context of contemporary debates in both China and the West on the relations between religion, ethics and politics. This analysis suggests that the ethical consistency of belief and act, which is the necessary condition for the engendering of long-term solidarity in religious community, has significant implications for ethics in politics, and especially for the legitimacy of representational leadership as a focal point for change in society. The paper concludes that the historical experience of world religions can offer new insights into the nature of political leadership and representation in today’s globalised world and that the appropriate locus for this inquiry is the present negotiation and re-negotiation of relations between China and the West.

Keywords social transformation      Confucianism and Christianity      phenomenology      leadership     
Corresponding Authors: Oliver Davies,   
Issue Date: 05 December 2012
URL:     OR
[1] Megan Altman. Heidegger on the Struggle for Belongingness and Being at Home[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(3): 444-462.
[2] JIN Xiping. Heidegger’s Conception of Being-with (Mitsein ) and His Simple Designation of Social and Political Reality in the Black Notebooks[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(3): 415-429.
[3] François Raffoul. The Invisible and the Secret: Of a Phenomenology of the Inapparent[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(3): 395-414.
[4] Welsh Talia. Many Healths: Nietzsche and Phenomenologies of Illness[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(3): 338-357.
[5] Saulius Geniusas. Max Scheler’s Phenomenology of Pain[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(3): 358-376.
[6] Frank Schalow. A Diltheyan Loop? The Methodological Side of Heidegger’s Kant-Interpretation[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(3): 377-394.
[7] Tara Kennedy. The Ethics of Treating Animals as Resources: A Post-Heideggerian Approach[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(3): 463-482.
[8] WANG Tangjia. A Philosophical Analysis of the Concept of Crisis[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(2): 254-267.
[9] DENG Xiaomang. Heidegger’s distortion of dialectics in “Hegel’s Concept of Experience”[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2009, 4(2): 294-307.
[10] ZHANG Wei. The foundation of phenomenological ethics: Intentional feelings[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2009, 4(1): 130-142.
[11] HUANG Yushun. On “viewing things” and “viewing nothing”: A dialogue between Confucianism and Phenomenology[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2008, 3(2): 177-193.
[12] SHANG Jie. Imagination of the evil[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2007, 2(3): 412-422.
[13] HUANG Yushun. Return to life and reconstruct Confucianism: An outline of comparative study on Confucianism and phenomenology[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2007, 2(3): 454-473.
Full text