Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Philosophy in China

ISSN 1673-3436

ISSN 1673-355X(Online)

CN 11-5743/B

Postal Subscription Code 80-983

Front Phil Chin    2013, Vol. 8 Issue (1) : 99-119     DOI: 10.3868/s030-002-013-0007-4
research-article |
Why Talk about Chinese Metaphysics?
Ralph Weber()
URPP Asia and Europe, University of Zurich, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland
Download: PDF(335 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract  

Chinese philosophy in the twentieth century has often been related to some sort of cultural or other particularism or some sort of philosophical universalism. By and large, these still seem to be the terms along which academic debates are carried out. The tension is particularly manifest in notions such as “Chinese philosophy,” “Daoist cosmology,” “Neo-Confucian idealism,” or “Chinese metaphysics.” For some, “Chinese metaphysics” may be a blatant contradictio in adiecto, while others may find it a most ordinary topic to be discussed at the beginning of the twenty-first century. In this article, I set out to examine two major discourses in which talk about “metaphysics” is frequent and popular and to which talk of “Chinese metaphysics” may wish to contribute: the history of philosophy and analytic philosophy. My contention is that it is usually far from obvious what reasons are behind putting “Chinese metaphysics” on the academic agenda and to what precise purpose this is done. What my discussion seeks to highlight is the as yet often largely unarticulated dimension of the politics of comparative philosophy—of which talk about “Chinese metaphysics” may but need not be an example.

Keywords metaphysics      Chinese philosophy      history of philosophy      analytic philosophy      politics of comparative philosophy     
Corresponding Authors: Ralph Weber,Email:ralph.weber@uzh.ch   
Issue Date: 05 March 2013
URL:  
http://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.3868/s030-002-013-0007-4     OR     http://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2013/V8/I1/99
[1] GUO Yi. Research Findings Concerning Excavated Texts and Learning in Early China[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(2): 168-184.
[2] Tom Stoneham. Quine on Quantification and Existence[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(1): 54-72.
[3] Russell Pryba. Ars Erotica and Ars Gastronomica in Shusterman’s Somaesthetics[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(2): 192-200.
[4] ZHAO Dongming. Neo-Confucian Theory of Mind as a Discourse of the Infinite: The Lu-Wang School[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(1): 75-94.
[5] XIA Ying. The Principle of Production and a Critique of Metaphysics: From the Perspective of Theory of Baudrillard Contractual Approach Based on Rawls’ Device of the “Original Position”[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(2): 181-193.
[6] Markus Gabriel. The Meaning of “Existence” and the Contingency of Sense[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(1): 109-129.
[7] Rina Marie Camus. The Wiseman and the Sage: Metaphysics as Wisdom in Aristotle and the Neo-Confucian School of Principle[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(1): 120-139.
[8] James Garrison. On Cheng Chung-Ying’s Bentiyong Onto-hermeneutics[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(3): 471-480.
[9] CHEN Jiaming. On the Issues of Transcendental Argument[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(2): 255-269.
[10] Andrei A. BUCKAREFF. Intralevel Mental Causation[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2011, 6(3): 402-425.
[11] GAO Guoxi, . Kant’s Virtue Theory[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2010, 5(2): 266-279.
[12] YU Zhiping, . The evolution and formation of indigenous narration in Chinese philosophy[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2009, 4(4): 511-523.
[13] YU Weidong , XU Jin , . Morality and nature: The essential difference between the Dao of Chinese philosophy and metaphysics in Western philosophy[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2009, 4(3): 360-369.
[14] DENG Xiaomang. Heidegger’s distortion of dialectics in “Hegel’s Concept of Experience”[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2009, 4(2): 294-307.
[15] XIANG Shiling. A study on the theory of “returning to the original” and “recovering nature” in Chinese philosophy[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2008, 3(4): 502-519.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed