Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Philosophy in China

ISSN 1673-3436

ISSN 1673-355X(Online)

CN 11-5743/B

Postal Subscription Code 80-983

Front Phil Chin    2013, Vol. 8 Issue (2) : 183-198     DOI: 10.3868/s030-002-013-0014-0
research-article |
The Battle over Confucius and Classical Chinese Philosophy in European Early Enlightenment Thought (1670-1730)
Jonathan Israel()
School of Historical Studies, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA
Download: PDF(276 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract  

A profound split is evident during the period 1670–1730 in the way European scholars and commentators attempted to understand and describe classical Chinese thought. For some, Confucianism acknowledged divine creation and divine governance of the world, immortality of the soul and other elements of Natural Theology. The Radical Enlightenment thinkers, however, and also some Christian scholars denied that Confucianism was based on Natural Theology or pervaded by belief in divine providence, characterizing it rather as monist, naturalist and Spinozist. The disagreement proved fundamental in several respects and proved divisive for the Church, as well as European thought more generally, producing a series of lively disputes that continued over several decades.

Keywords Radical Enlightenment      Confucianism      atheism      naturalism      Spinozism      monism      Jesuits      creation      divine providence      Natural Theology     
Corresponding Authors: Jonathan Israel,Email:jisrael@ias.edu   
Issue Date: 05 June 2013
URL:  
http://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.3868/s030-002-013-0014-0     OR     http://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2013/V8/I2/183
[1] GAO Kun. A Naturalistic Look into Maddy’s Naturalistic Philosophy of Mathematics[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(1): 137-151.
[2] TAN Mingran. The Problem of Confucian Moral Cultivation and Its Solution: Using Ritual Propriety to Support Rule by Law[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(1): 88-103.
[3] LAN Fei. Humanity and Paternal Eros: The Father-Son Relationship in Comparative Perspective[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(4): 629-646.
[4] Richard Shusterman. Somaesthetics and Chinese Philosophy: Between Unity and Pragmatist Pluralism[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(2): 201-211.
[5] YAO Xinzhong. An Eco-Ethical Interpretation of Confucian Tianren Heyi[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(4): 570-585.
[6] Jung-Yeup Kim. Confucian Ethical Practice as a Method of Creating and Sustaining Whiteheadian Beauty[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(2): 318-328.
[7] Chris Fraser. Xunzi Versus Zhuangzi: Two Approaches to Death in Classical Chinese Thought[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(3): 410-427.
[8] John Ramsey. The Role Dilemma in Early Confucianism[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(3): 376-387.
[9] PENG Chengyi. Traditional Confucian Constitutionalism: Current Explorations and Prospects[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(1): 76-98.
[10] GUO Qiyong. On Confucian Political Philosophy and Its Theory of Justice[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(1): 53-75.
[11] CHEN Lai. The Basic Character of the Virtue Theory of Mencius’ Philosophy and Its Significance in Classical Confucianism[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(1): 4-21.
[12] Oliver Davies. Religion, Politics and Ethics: Towards a Global Theory of Social Transformation[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(4): 572-597.
[13] TANG Siufu. Self and Community in the Xunzi[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(3): 455-470.
[14] WEN Haiming. Confucian Co-creative Ethics: Self and Family[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(3): 439-454.
[15] YE Feng. Some Naturalistic Comments on Frege’s Philosophy of Mathematics[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(3): 378-403.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed