Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Philosophy in China

ISSN 1673-3436

ISSN 1673-355X(Online)

CN 11-5743/B

Postal Subscription Code 80-983

Front. Philos. China    2014, Vol. 9 Issue (3) : 463-478    https://doi.org/10.3868/s030-003-014-0036-8
research-article
Criticism of the Theory of Motivation
DENG Xize()
School of Politics, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China
 Download: PDF(283 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The theory of motivation is a theory which takes the executora’s motivation as the basis of moral judgment. One presupposition of the theory is that motivation can be a common object of understanding. However, motivation exists only in the heart of the executor, and cannot be known exactly by others, so motivation cannot be perceived like a common object, and thus, logically, cannot be the basis of moral judgment. Even if the executor’s motivation is accepted by others and turned into a common object, the motivation still cannot become the valid basis of a moral judgment. This is the dilemma of the theory of motivation. In practice, the dilemma appears as follows: if one insists on the theory of motivation, one can be led to the result that people do evil with good intentions. However, just because motivation cannot be the basis of moral judgment does not mean that motivation is of no significance. Good motivation is always better than evil motivation. Therefore, in moral education we should carry out motivation education and teach people to strive to have good motivations for their behavior. This is the value of motivation theory.

Keywords theory of motivation      common object      validity      moral structure      moral judgment      basis     
Issue Date: 23 September 2014
 Cite this article:   
DENG Xize. Criticism of the Theory of Motivation[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(3): 463-478.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.3868/s030-003-014-0036-8
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2014/V9/I3/463
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed