Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Philosophy in China

ISSN 1673-3436

ISSN 1673-355X(Online)

CN 11-5743/B

Postal Subscription Code 80-983

Front. Philos. China    2015, Vol. 10 Issue (3) : 457-473    https://doi.org/10.3868/s030-004-015-0034-2
research-article |
Aristotle on the Unity of Composite Substance
CAO Qingyun()
Philosophy Department, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China
 Download: PDF(322 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Aristotle claims that a sensible substance is composed of form and matter, while he insists that it is a unity in a strict sense. So there is the question—in what sense can a composite thing be a unity? Aristotle’s key solution lies in his account of matter as potentiality and form as actuality. Many scholars are bewildered by his laconic solutions, and there are mainly two approaches undertaken in interpretations. One is called “projective”; the other is called “explanatory.” But neither interpretation is satisfying. The main tasks of this paper are to reexamine the problem and the two interpretations, then to argue that the composition of a sensible substance should be understood in light of its coming-to-be; that its unity refers to its being a functional unity.

Issue Date: 28 October 2015
 Cite this article:   
CAO Qingyun. Aristotle on the Unity of Composite Substance[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(3): 457-473.
 URL:  
http://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.3868/s030-004-015-0034-2
http://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2015/V10/I3/457
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed