Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Philosophy in China

ISSN 1673-3436

ISSN 1673-355X(Online)

CN 11-5743/B

Postal Subscription Code 80-983

Front. Philos. China    2017, Vol. 12 Issue (1) : 10-25    https://doi.org/10.3868/s030-006-017-0002-5
Orginal Article |
Approaching Laozi : Comparing a Syncretic Reading to a Synthetic One
Thomas Michael1(), CHEN Yazhou2
1. School of Philosophy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2. School of Philosophy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
 Download: PDF(311 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Is Laozi a syncretic text whose primary body of ideas were cobbled together from multiple and various sources, none of which can reasonably be identified as Daoist, or is it a synthetic text whose ideas emerged from a single source that for all intents embodies the core elements of a tradition that meets the standards of inclusion for a tradition of early Daoism? The present work examines the key points of Hongkyung Kim’s sophisticated account of Laozi’s origins as a syncretic text. It then goes on to present the key points of what would have to be involved in its original circulations as a synthetic text. It concludes by suggesting a middle ground that is able to explain why an originally synthetic Laozi is all too easily read by modern scholars as a syncretic text.

Keywords Laozi      Dao De Jing      early Daoism      Lüshi Chunqiu      yangsheng      Hongkyung Kim     
Issue Date: 24 April 2017
 Cite this article:   
Thomas Michael,CHEN Yazhou. Approaching Laozi : Comparing a Syncretic Reading to a Synthetic One[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(1): 10-25.
 URL:  
http://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.3868/s030-006-017-0002-5
http://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2017/V12/I1/10
[1] CUI Xiaojiao. Paradoxes in the Textual Development of the Laozi: A Closer Examination of Chapters Eight and Twenty-Four[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(3): 393-407.
[2] ZHANG Weiwen. The Philosophy of “Naturalness” in the Laozi and Its Value For Contemporary Society[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(3): 340-357.
[3] Alan Fox. A Process Interpretation of Daoist Thought[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(1): 26-37.
[4] Franklin Perkins. The Laozi and the Cosmogonic Turn in Classical Chinese Philosophy[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(2): 185-205.
[5] NIE Minli. Yin and Yang , and the Hot and the Cold[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(1): 73-87.
[6] GUO Yi. The Origin and Differentiation of the Theories of Human Nature in Pre-Qin China[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(2): 212-238.
[7] HAO Changchi. Lao-Zhuang and Augustine on the Issue of Suspension in the Philosophy of Religion[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2011, 6(1): 75-99.
[8] LI Ruohui. On Laozi’s Dao—An Attempt to Make Philosophy Speak Chinese[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2011, 6(1): 1-19.
[9] Chen Bo. The debate on the yan–yi relation in Chinese philosophy: reconstruction and comments[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2006, 1(4): 539-560.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed