“The Westward Spread of Chinese Philosophy” and Marxism

doi:10.1007/s11466-011-0128-4

Front Phil Chin

2011, Vol. 6

Issue (1) : 114-133 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-011-0128-4

research-article

“The Westward Spread of Chinese Philosophy” and Marxism

ZHANG Yunyi(

)

School of Philosophy, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200230, China

Download: PDF(601 KB) HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Abstract

Chinese philosophy was transmitted to Europe in the 18th century through “Deism,” “organic philosophy,” “pure reason,” “absolute idea,” etc., and was absorbed by modern European philosophers. Chinese philosophy has also, via German classical philosophy, directly as well as indirectly influenced Marx and been absorbed into his philosophy. There is a cultural-psychological reason for the Chinese acceptance of Marxism. However, due to the influence of Occidentalism, this period of history has long been neglected.

Keywords Chinese zeal reason German classical philosophy Marxism

Corresponding Author(s): ZHANG Yunyi,Email:zhowjk@yahoo.com.cn

Issue Date: 05 March 2011

Cite this article:

ZHANG Yunyi. “The Westward Spread of Chinese Philosophy” and Marxism[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2011, 6(1): 114-133.

URL:

https://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.1007/s11466-011-0128-4
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2011/V6/I1/114

[1]	XU Xiangdong. Luck, Control, and Contrastive Explanation[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2019, 14(2): 303-321.
[2]	DONG Xinchun. Western Marxism’s Misreading of Marx’s Critique of Capitalism[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(3): 466-482.
[3]	KE Xiaogang. Reason and Besinnung: Heidegger’s Reflections on Science in Contributions to Philosophy [J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(3): 430-443.
[4]	López-Astorga Miguel. Logic, Pragmatics, and Types of Conditionals[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(2): 279-297.
[5]	ZHANG Liwen. Harmony and Justice[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(4): 533-546.
[6]	Olof Pettersson. Plato on Necessity and Disorder[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(4): 546-565.
[7]	John HYMAN. Acting for Reasons: Reply to Dancy[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2011, 6(3): 358-368.
[8]	Jonathan DANCY. Acting in Ignorance[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2011, 6(3): 345-357.
[9]	HAO Changchi. Lao-Zhuang and Augustine on the Issue of Suspension in the Philosophy of Religion[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2011, 6(1): 75-99.
[10]	ZHANG Zhongyi, ZHANG Jialong, . The three-form reasoning of new Hetu-vidya in Indian logic from the perspective of modern logic[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2009, 4(4): 631-645.
[11]	XIE Xialing. Aesthetic judgment: The power of the mind in understanding Confucianism[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2009, 4(1): 38-51.
[12]	WANG Yunping. Confucian ethics and emotions[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2008, 3(3): 352-365.
[13]	Yi Junqing. Dimensions of Modernity and Their Contemporary Fate[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2006, 1(1): 6-21.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed