Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Philosophy in China

ISSN 1673-3436

ISSN 1673-355X(Online)

CN 11-5743/B

Postal Subscription Code 80-983

Front. Philos. China    2015, Vol. 10 Issue (1) : 130-147    https://doi.org/10.3868/s030-004-015-0008-9
research-article
Traces of the Person: Max Scheler’s and Paul Ricoeur’s Attempts on Personal Ethics
Annette Hilt()
Department of Philosophy, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz 55099, Germany
 Download: PDF(251 KB)  
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

To encounter a fellow-being does not mean only to see her face, to notice the color of her eyes, but to meet her eyes and to be addressed by her. Who one is irreducible to any objective property or value, and likewise cannot be comprehended through propositional statements in the manner of “talking about …” something. Rather, such comprehension demands an account of giving way to the appearance of the other as other. This account, prominently linked to E. Levinas’ “ethics as first philosophy,” has also been developed as phenomenological personalism. While Max Scheler developed his “Ethical Personalism” within his material Value Ethics, his Philosophy of Fellow-Feeling and in his late Philosophical Anthropology of human spirit, Paul Ricoeur develops his personalism through different approaches: from his early attempts on need and desire as the affective basis of our values to the perspective on the particular way we lead our lives in narratively constituting our personal identity, and finally to his concept of recognition. Reconstructing personalism as a philosophy of discovering the other person in her otherness and as a concept of social practice are the aims of this paper.

Keywords Scheler      Ricoeur      person      fellow-feeling      narrativity     
Issue Date: 23 March 2015
 Cite this article:   
Annette Hilt. Traces of the Person: Max Scheler’s and Paul Ricoeur’s Attempts on Personal Ethics[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(1): 130-147.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.3868/s030-004-015-0008-9
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2015/V10/I1/130
[1] ZHANG Xianglong. The Marginality of Phenomenology[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2020, 15(3): 472-492.
[2] Heath Williams. Analytic Phenomenology (or “What It Is Like”) vs. Husserlian Phenomenology[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2020, 15(3): 427-450.
[3] John Robert Williams. A Couple Nagging Interpretive Difficulties in Zhuangzi Studies vis-à-vis William James on the Ethics and Psychology of Belief[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2019, 14(4): 593-611.
[4] Timothy O’Connor. Consciousness, Free Will, and the Sciences of the Mind[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2018, 13(3): 394-401.
[5] Mark L. Farrugia. To Die or Not to Die: Zhuangzi’s Three Immortalities[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(3): 380-414.
[6] TAN Mingran. Wang Fuzhi’s Interpretation of Spirit/Shen in His Annotation on the Zhuangzi[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(2): 239-254.
[7] HU Jiaxiang. Mencius’ Aesthetics and Its Position[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2011, 6(1): 41-56.
[8] ZHANG Wei. The foundation of phenomenological ethics: Intentional feelings[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2009, 4(1): 130-142.
[9] ZHAO Tingyang. The self and the other: An unanswered question in Confucian theory[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2008, 3(2): 163-176.
[10] Liao Shenbai. Doing business: an obscure notion of the ethics of public associations in ordinary Chinese[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2006, 1(3): 325-340.
[11] Yang Guorong. On Luo Congyan’s Ethics[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2006, 1(1): 102-113.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed